Unfair

[Jwillz46]

Right.......

So who gets to debate me first? Next poster reproposing his challenge will be the unlucky one.

 

[australopithecus]

I don't know what you're talking about in the first part of your post at all.

The debate topic would be atheism, why atheists deny Jesus Christ, and intentionally choose to disbelieve in Christianity.

The debate topic would be Christianity, why Christians deny Thor, and intentionally choose to disbelieve in Norse Paganism.

That would be a better debate, given your already evident ignorance on the position of atheism and it's nuances, coupled with the fact you're already convinced you've won any debate you'll ever have. You're not looking for a debate, you're looking for an opportunity to insert your fingers in your ears and shout "I'M RIGHT, I'M RIGHT I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALALALALALA!!! ".

But then trolling is rarely subtle.

 

[Jwillz46]

Is that a challenge to debate me? I can't tell.

You atheists claim I'm putting words into your mouth while always putting words into mine. What hypocrites.

 

[tuxbox]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

You have to be kiddin, right?

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Is that a challenge to debate me? I can't tell.

You atheists claim I'm putting words into your mouth while always putting words into mine. What hypocrites.

I'll debate you. I take your offer - check and set.

I'm no atheist though - I'm a pagan. They'll vouch for that and you can check all of my posts on the matter.

The debate is simple:

Why do Christians deny the existence of the Gods and spirits in favor of an invisible, immoral skydaddy?

Put up or Shut Up. Or are you chicken, McFly?

 

[australopithecus]

Is that a challenge to debate me? I can't tell.

You atheists claim I'm putting words into your mouth while always putting words into mine. What hypocrites.

I'm not saying your putting words in anyone's mouth, I'm just sayin you're incredible ignorant. Anyway, you have your reply. Hyyegia will debate you, and he's forwarded a topic. Say the word and I'll set it up.

 

[Frenger]

I don't know what you're talking about in the first part of your post at all.

The debate topic would be atheism, why atheists deny Jesus Christ, and intentionally choose to disbelieve in Christianity.

Oh my word, I'm guessing english is your first language but thinking is not your primary concern? The question you have proposed makes absolutely no sense, it is "nonsense".

The only reasonable question I think I can get out of this steaming pile of horseshit is "is Christianity true?". The rest is just utter crap. Why you think you can comment on the decisions of all atheists (whether or not their disbelief is intentional or not) is beyond me. And if god is all powerful, shouldn't he stop this? And if he is all knowing, shouldn't he have seen this coming? He's a stickler for punishment int' he.

So, as atheism isn't a stance, or a world view, or an ideology it seems to me a boring topic to debate. As Christianity is however, that sounds a lot better.

So I accept your challenge with the title "is Christianity true?"

I say 3000 words each (if you can't make your point in 3000 words it's not worth reading) and I will let you have the first post.

Balls in your court Mcfly.

 

[Frenger]

Damn! Beat me to it Hytegia. I knew I shouldn't have slept!!!

Well, that's now 6, count them SIX people who have accepted this polite and well meaning chap's challenge.

Let's see who he picks.

 

[Jwillz46]

I accept Hytegia's challenge, set up the debate and lay the rules, Australopithecus.

 

[Frenger]

I accept Hytegia's challenge, set up the debate and lay the rules, Australopithecus.

This is going to be good, I may have to book myself in to the hospital to get my sides reattached.

 

[australopithecus]

I accept Hytegia's challenge, set up the debate and lay the rules, Australopithecus.

http://www.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=9898

Once Hytegia's opened the debate you can then respond. Pay close attention to the rules, I wont be repeating them.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

I accept Hytegia's challenge, set up the debate and lay the rules, Australopithecus.

This is going to be good, I may have to book myself in to the hospital to get my sides reattached.

The proprietary goal is that of "Immoral" and the secondary goal is that of "More Contradictory as opposed to -"

I will not use any "new" arguments in this, and instead will confine myself to the fact that I will not use any argument that my opponent would not use to prove the Judeo-Christian-Islamic deity. I will simply rely on the utilization of Occam's Razor that, given these results, one can shave off the obvious contradiction in lieu of a less-contradictory entity.

Specifically the Hellenistic Period deities.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Can I ask why this troll isn't banned already?

 

[Frenger]

Because she/he is going to have a debate with Hytegia, and it's going to be great!

edited: to correct my grammar so I didn't look thick.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Because she/he is going to have a debate with Hytegia, and it's going to be all the fun of watching a train wreck!

Further edited for clarity.

Hey, at least I know how this will end.

 

[Frenger]

Because she/he is going to have a debate with Hytegia, and it's going to be all the fun of watching a train wreck!

Further edited for clarity.

Hey, at least I know how this will end.

Thanks bud!

I think we all know how it's going to end, but it doesn't mean the journey won't be spectacular

 

[borrofburi]

You had us going for a bit - even after evidence was presented you legitimately had us running for our money. Hell, you may still convince the others that you're serious so I'll just sit back and eat my Popcorn.
8/10

Going for a bit? http://www.leagueofreason.org.uk//viewtopic.php?p=143376#p143376

Can I ask why this troll isn't banned already?

Eh, why should we ban him? I'd like to think our users are smart enough not to engage a troll unless they're having fun with it.

 

[Gnug215]

Looks to me like any good christian arguments are just deleted or hidden here...

I am open to debate atheists on Skype, Ventrilo, Teamspeak 3, and other VOIP programs/services, or by phone. Post here if you're interested. I'm certain you will lose.

Ok, so I'm looking at your sig, and wow... are you serious??

You're actually a Yahoo Messenger user???


As for the whole "unfair" thing...

First of all, there are no "good christian arguments".

There is some banning and deleting going on, but that's mostly just me. I'm a really ban-happy, power-mad moderator.

Not really an atheist, so I have no interest in debating you, but I do have a great interest in banning you, because you seem like a troll.

I don't really like trolls much, and you really, really do seem like a troll, what with your short, confrontational, provocative posts. (Hmm, you're not Stripe, are you?)

So if you're actually serious about debating someone here (which I doubt), you had better try to make good, sensible, productive posts, before I succumb to my insatiable urge to put the banhammer down on useless little trolls.


Beyond that... welcome to the forum!

 

[CosmicJoghurt]

It is not going to be a good debate. It's going to be yet another situation where a debate will go on and on, until, little by little, it becomes obvious that one (I won't tell who it is) of the debaters isn't there for debating but for trolling, coupled with a bit of an honest opinion. Afterwards comes the stage where the indirect insults start, one of them takes it too far, the debate ends and one of the debaters leaves.

That's my prediction. If it doesn't come true I will share a cookie with you all.

 

[bluejatheist]

Ok, so I'm looking at your sig, and wow... are you serious??

You're actually a Yahoo Messenger user???

I wonder where he gets his answers from