Unfair

[CommonEnlightenment]

Yeah, pretend to laugh and will yourself above me as a person in your mind, but just as God does, we both know the real truth.

Definition

 

[Jwillz46]

Yeah, pretend to laugh and will yourself above me as a person in your mind, but just as God does, we both know the real truth.

Definition

Looks like you're at a loss of words so you've resorted to simply linking to a Dictionary definition to compensate for your lack of argument. Typical Atheists. What's next, citing The God Illusion?

 

[DepricatedZero]

The debate by voice would be recorded, ofcourse, but I see every last atheist here is too cowardly to dare have a real one on one debate. What did I expect, coming on a forum that only exists so a certain group can sit there and tell eachother how much they agree with one another, clearly I am intimidating to everyone here seeing as you all post nothing but a barrage of fear-filled excuses.

Funny how atheists tremble in the presence of actual reasoning while claiming to be "rational" all the time.
Yeah, pretend to laugh and will yourself above me as a person in your mind, but just as God does, we both know the real truth.

I for one am willing to put my money where my mouth is, how about you self-proclaimed masters of reason?

"Fear filled excuses" being "sure we'll debate you, here in text where all can see"

You issued a challenge and were met with answers that someone would accept your challenge on the terms that it be here, where it's relevant.

I simply don't find you compelling enough to bother with. You haven't even offered a subject.

 

[CommonEnlightenment]

Looks like you're at a loss of words so you've resorted to simply linking to a Dictionary definition to compensate for your lack of argument. Typical Atheists. What's next, citing The God Illusion?

Nope,

How about addressing the issue that your assertion is baseless. First and foremost one would have to establish the existence of a Deity and more specifically your Deity. Then one would have to establish the validity that your Deity is the real truth. Once those two things have been established then we can move from the area of a baseless assertion to a founded assertion.

 

[Jwillz46]

Looks like you're at a loss of words so you've resorted to simply linking to a Dictionary definition to compensate for your lack of argument. Typical Atheists. What's next, citing The God Illusion?

Nope,

How about addressing the issue that your assertion is baseless. First and foremost one would have to establish the existence of a Deity and more specifically your Deity. Then one would have to establish the validity that your Deity is the real truth. Once those two things have been established then we can move from the area of a baseless assertion to a founded assertion.

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

 

[CommonEnlightenment]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

I can get my hands on a book that claims that planetary motion is governed by epicycles and deferents. Just because this book claims this to be fact doesn't make it so. Please return when you have more substantial data.

 

[Jwillz46]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

I can get my hands on a book that claims that planetary motion is governed by epicycles and deferents. Just because this book claims this to be fact doesn't make it so. Please return when you have more substantial data.

I laughed out loud because of this! :lol:

Was this scientific theory written by God? No, it was not. Of course a human can simply write something and claim it as fact, but The Bible is different. It is the word of the LORD. The LORD is outside of the realm of the scientific process. It is not governed by experimentation and reviewing, rather, it is all plausible based on the power of faith (and the simple fact that it's simply true).

 

[pyrettablaze]

I will debate chriatianity.. skype or anyway... you come in with no debate however, only baseless accusations and no debate. Lets trade skypes and I will get my bible... Christianity is nothing but borrowed ideals from older civilizations. Jesus himself is built on the babylonian Tammuz. From his date of birth to his sheperdness to his whole resurrection.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

I'm not even an atheist and I can see that your logic already holds no water and that you're being a coward.

Why not follow in the footsteps of Bob and do a forum debate?
It allows time and space for one to form their thoughts, gather evidence, and to check the validity of another's claims - this keeps people from, say, making shit up on the fly and winning simply because they're quick-to-wit, and moreso because they have the evidence in backing. It also hosts a public record, since nothing here gets deleted.

If we really wanted censorship, then why is your post about this forum being a censorship still open, and not itself locked and deleted?

 

[australopithecus]

Jwillz46...

We are not jumping through hoops to debate someone who does nothing but childishly insult people with overt accusary bollocks. You demanded debate, 2 members stated they would oblige despite you offering no subject to debate. You demand voice only debates because you don't want to to be jumped on by 10 posters, we state we will oblige by setting up a debate thread where only you and the person you are debating can post. Still you make excuses and accusations.

Shit or get off the pot. Have a debate here, in the debate forum, with someone who has offered to, or don't.

The voice chat isn't happening. It's a convoluted and highly complicated way of debate, recorded or not. Prole was bang on the money, you seem terrified of written debate because you'd be unable to pull the usual dishonest fundie bullshit without being called on it.

Balls in your court, though continue making useless and snide posts and you'll find yourself without a court. We're not here to stroke your ego.

 

[Jwillz46]

Ok, I don't fear any of you, and will debate on your terms... Which one is going to take me on?

 

[australopithecus]

I believe Frenger, but as of yet you haven't stated a topic for debate.

 

[Laurens]

My offer is still there to debate here.

Although I get a whiff of troll from this guy...

 

[bluejatheist]

Here goes someone with a David and Goliath Complex

 

[Prolescum]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

Ha ha! "Good Christian argument"?

My book (probably the KJV) is true therefore I win, eh?
Evolution: it's only a "theory"?

Pahahahahahaha!

Someone spank this time waster before his ego suffocates his neighbours.

 

[bluejatheist]

Although I get a whiff of troll from this guy...

I second this

PS is this just a screen name coincidence?

 

[Frenger]

Have you ever read the Bible? If you did, you would know that it says God exists. Is that not proof enough? If you don't take the Bible as proof then you might as well ignore your false modern science. There is written, documented proof of God which you choose to not believe, but you believe in nutjob theories like evolution with no proof? And another thing, it's called a theory for a reason: because it's fake!

I have recently read a book by Murakami where there is an alternative universe called 1Q84. This world is filled with "little people" who feed information to a leader of a cult who happens to be a bit of a child rapist. There are two moons that only the people who are aware they are in this new world can see.

My point being that the world is full of fiction and the bible is no different. The claims stand or fall on their own merit. If we took all written word as fact I would still believe there is a family of yellow dogs with brown spots and that people were built in geometric shapes and were named after just one of their attributes. (spot the dog and mr men respectively).

Ok, I don't fear any of you, and will debate on your terms... Which one is going to take me on?

You have had 3 people accept your challenge thus far (me, Laurens and pyrettablaze) so I suggest you pick a topic and we'll see who wants to debate you. Pyrettablaze has offered to debate you on the bible, if that seems appealing to you then go for that, if not pick a topic and stop dancing around like a 5 year old kid shouting "my dad's harder than your dad". Immaturity is not becoming.

 

[Frenger]

Someone spank this time waster before his ego suffocates his neighbours.

His ego is amazing isn't it. I get the impression that if he was having sex with a super model he'd close his eyes and imagine jerking off.

 

[australopithecus]

Although I get a whiff of troll from this guy...

I second this

PS is this just a screen name coincidence?

Maybe, but let's not descend into childishness too. Srsly.

 

[televator]

I am getting a poe vibe as well.