-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
This is going to give atheists nightmares
- Thread starter abelcainsbrother
- Start date
abelcainsbrother
New Member
Mugnuts said:personal testimony/experience is not evidence. There are 10 times more alien abduction and encounter videos that are exactly the same as that guys story in every way.
I've had a personal experience with a unincorn....can you refute it?
I know this is atheists answer to any kind of evidence that might go against their views.There have not been scientific studies on alien abductions like with NDE's and the links I gave are all documented cases of NDE's.How could people come back from death and know about relatives they did not even know about? I'm not ruling out alien abductions but this thread is about the science behind NDE's.This scientific study on NDE's is being done by agnostics who before they went into this thought they were hallucinations but have changed their minds and have funding for the next study on NDE's.They are under tremendous pressure from atheists also.
And earlier I posted a link ,it was an interview about the woman who wrote a book dismissing NDE's and lied in her book claiming that one of authors of this study on NDE's agreed with her, she assumed this because he is an atheist but it was pointed out to her that he does not agree with her.She wrote a book telling lies and was exposed and she is a professor of neuro-science.
abelcainsbrother
New Member
The authors of this study on NDE's were giving speeches at atheist conventions dismissing God,etc before they went into this study on NDE's but it seems have become agnostic and so they are no longer allowed to speak at atheist get-togethers.They have been persuaded by the research they have done on NDE's.Aheists should back off if you want the truth like you claim to,they don't and are willing to censor to keep the truth suppressed.This shows atheists are not really open to evidence that might point to life after death.
Let's not kid ourselves though this is significant scientific research that could destroy materialism and that there is no mind,just the physical matter that makes up the brain and after you die,that's it.
Let's not kid ourselves though this is significant scientific research that could destroy materialism and that there is no mind,just the physical matter that makes up the brain and after you die,that's it.
ACB, there is a reason we ask you questions. We expect an answer to it so the discussion can go on. You don't want to answer any questions because you know that the answer will undermine your own case. Pathetic and dishonest are adjectives that come to mind.
Start replying to the questions asked and give an honest answer or don't bother responding.
Start replying to the questions asked and give an honest answer or don't bother responding.
Master_Ghost_Knight
New Member
How do you know that they didn't know about them?abelcainsbrother said:
abelcainsbrother
New Member
Master_Ghost_Knight said:
How do you know they did? I'm just pointing out scientific documented NDE's you can reject it,or not believe it,but this is science you are rejecting.I think it is interesting and am just pointing it out.I would think atheists would really want to look into the science behind NDE's to know if this is true or not to know the truth.I've heard atheists say they would believe in God if we gave evidence and even though this is not evidence for God? It is evidence for life after death which atheists think is wrong.You need to make sure and go with evidence and let the chips fall where they may.Dr Sam Parnia has changed his mind about NDE's.
Master_Ghost_Knight
New Member
I don't know, it is your anecdote, I didn't interview the person, I didn't make the study, I didn't set up the experiment. It's not for me to prove either way. It is your claim that they didn't know about it, and I asking how did you know that they didn't know about it?abelcainsbrother said:
Or should I just make random claims and expect other people to accept it just because they don't know otherwise?
No, they are not scientific, they are anecdotes. And yes, I am rejecting them. Now what will you do?abelcainsbrother said:
Even if they were made the target of a study with proper rigor and method under the gaze of proper science (which isn't), doesn't mean that the conclusions are any good and I have to accept them. They have to properly convince me by providing a mechanism, repeatability, ruling out alternative explanations such as hallucination (which is what actually is the case) and standing up to peer review. Only after you have that, then I will accept it, until then it is just words on a piece paper.
I have. It isn't.abelcainsbrother said:
australopithecus
Active Member
Point of interest: I've still not had nightmares.