• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

The stupidest thing a creatonist has ever said to you

arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>

well basically anything from his topic would fit here.
all of his points were refuted. though he still continue spout nonsense... and tried for a second time.
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
nemesiss said:

well basically anything from his topic would fit here.
all of his points were refuted. though he still continue spout nonsense... and tried for a second time.
Remember kids, if your argument gets refuted, try saying it again in huge bold words



pro-tip: you can also use this preemptively, thus rendering your arguments irrefutable!
 
arg-fallbackName="Case"/>
YoutubeInvalidArguements.jpg
 
arg-fallbackName="nophun"/>
Creationist said:
The thing I find so ironic about Atheism, is that it is also is a part of prophecy.
You literally are predicted as a great falling away.
If it weren't for Atheism the Bible might be in error.
:shock: : :facepalm:
 
arg-fallbackName="ShootMyMonkey"/>
I got this one in an email reply from someone who read the diatribe on my site... truly awesome how it finishes --
You think religion is all about ignorance? What a sorry liberal ass you are with your bullshit about morals. I understand the truth of Jesus Christ, and you say it's all lies, and that makes you the ignorant.

No, it's not about what I want to believe or my hopes. It's about God's love. We brothers in Christ are an army against the doubters like you, and there is no I in army, just like there is no I in ignorance. But there is a u in asshoule.
 
arg-fallbackName="Amerist"/>
"Can a monkey jump out of a rock?!"

"I don't think so--"

"Evolution is false!" *hits Bible*

He'd say this a lot, even after someone asked him if it wasn't actually his position that monkeys poofed into existence. Evolution made no such claim. (When he said this to me the first time I directed him to Pasteur with a snicker; he made a joke about milk and ignored me for the rest of the night.)
 
arg-fallbackName="Nithel"/>
"It's not like science has ever brought us any good"

He thought Science was a religion that worshiped humans.
 
arg-fallbackName="UnicornCatheter"/>
"I have never seen a cat give birth to a lizard, bat , or monkey therefore evolution is a lie" This came from a JW a couple of months ago.
 
arg-fallbackName="AllMakesCombined"/>
Ok. I've been a member of an automotive humor forum for about a decade now, and as of a few years ago, they added a "Debacle" forum. Just today, I've finally seen the most idiotic thing a creationist has ever said to me:
No such thing as neanderthals. Any fossils supporting this are monkies and nothing more.

o_O

I asked him the following:
Just curious.... Check out the list of questions below and tell me where your first "No" answer is.

Are we alive?
Are we technically animals?
Are we vertebrates?
Are we mammals (have hair, warm blooded, nurture young, etc)?
Are we primates (prehensile hands, forward eyes, includes lemurs, shrews, monkeys, apes)?
Are we hominids (includes other apes, oraguntan, )?
Are we closely related to neanderthals, and other "cave men"?
Are we homo sapiens?

And he said we are not animals.... to which I replied:
So if we are not animals, then we taxologically belong in a completely separate kingdom. You have Plant, Fungi, Bacteria, Protozoa, Animals, Chromista, and whatever humans are. And here I thought moving to 6 kingdoms in biological classification was too many. LOL

Kingdom - Human
Phylum - Human
Class - Human
Order - Human
Family - Human
Genus - Homo (of which we're the only ones because other 'homo' are really hoaxes and monkey skulls)
Species - Sapiens

Enjoy!
 
arg-fallbackName="Ce4or"/>
On a motorcycling forum, creationist tried to answer how Old testament characters where supposed to live so long,

" The air pressure was double what it is now. "

This was a US site I used to leave this stuff alone but I couldn't help my self on that one.
 
arg-fallbackName="RichardMNixon"/>
Ce4or said:
On a motorcycling forum, creationist tried to answer how Old testament characters where supposed to live so long,

" The air pressure was double what it is now. "

This was a US site I used to leave this stuff alone but I couldn't help my self on that one.

I've seen that before, fun stuff. Did he explain it's double because of the giant shield of ice in the upper atmosphere pushing down on it?
 
arg-fallbackName="FaithlessThinker"/>
Ce4or said:
On a motorcycling forum, creationist tried to answer how Old testament characters where supposed to live so long,

" The air pressure was double what it is now. "

This was a US site I used to leave this stuff alone but I couldn't help my self on that one.
Let's test that theory by putting a human being inside a chamber with 2 atm pressure, and checking how long he will live.

Edit: Oh, and I think the best candidate for the expt should be that creationist who made the claim.
 
arg-fallbackName="Mithcoriel"/>
What's the point of that claim with the double air pressure, anyway? How is that supposed to prolong life? Does it supposedly decrease, dunno, the rate of decay of the body?
 
arg-fallbackName="Commander Eagle"/>
Mithcoriel said:
What's the point of that claim with the double air pressure, anyway? How is that supposed to prolong life?
No one knows. Kent Hovind came up with it, and he isn't telling.
Does it supposedly decrease, dunno, the rate of decay of the body?
No, Hovind says X-rays are responsible for aging.
 
arg-fallbackName="RichardMNixon"/>
Commander Eagle said:
Mithcoriel said:
What's the point of that claim with the double air pressure, anyway? How is that supposed to prolong life?
No one knows. Kent Hovind came up with it, and he isn't telling.
Does it supposedly decrease, dunno, the rate of decay of the body?
No, Hovind says X-rays are responsible for aging.

Nah, it would most likely just increase oxidative stress in your body and give you cancer.



Have we covered the "which evolved first, man or woman?" question yet in this topic?
 
arg-fallbackName="Commander Eagle"/>
RichardMNixon said:
Have we covered the "which evolved first, man or woman?" question yet in this topic?
Probably, but it's always good for a laugh. Why not do it again?
 
arg-fallbackName="DepricatedZero"/>
Commander Eagle said:
Mithcoriel said:
What's the point of that claim with the double air pressure, anyway? How is that supposed to prolong life?
No one knows. Kent Hovind came up with it, and he isn't telling.
Does it supposedly decrease, dunno, the rate of decay of the body?
No, Hovind says X-rays are responsible for aging.
I wonder if this originates from the explanation I heard a long time ago, that dinosaurs were able to grow so large because there was much more oxygen in the atmosphere? Maybe large = long lived and oxygen = air so double air = double long lived? lol. . .
 
Back
Top