I am the Second Coming of Christ

[Timothy]

Are you a theoretical physicist? What are your qualifications?

 

[australopithecus]

Irrelevent, though red herrings are to be expected. Fact remains, all you're doing is spouting nonsense that has zero grounding in reality or physics. It's evident you have little or any knowledge of cosmology to any degree and whereas I'm no PhD student, I know enough to know you know little.

 

[lrkun]

The meaning of the universe is life and the meaning of life is to feel good. I'm pretty sure of that.

It's just that this is very unclear in a world where it's so difficult to feel good. In Paradise the meaning of life will be crystal clear.

So in effect we humans should have sex more, do drugs more, get violent, and other feel good activities? Do you realize what you're talking about? It is not enought that you're pretty sure about things, you must know that it is so.

I don't mind having this sort of discussion in the forum, but really, you have to draw a line, between that which is acceptable or pure irresponsibility.

Timothy, I can't help but pity you so much right now.

 

[Timothy]

I appreciate your pity Irkun.

If you think my theory is nonsense austra that's fine but your opinion doesn't interest me. If there is someone who actually has a doctorate in theoretical physics or cosmology or astrophysics or something then I would be more interested in that.

Dear Irkun. I never wrote that we should have sex or drugs more and I definitely didn't write that we should be violent more.

I don't know anything Irkun. I don't know 2+2 = 4 I'm just 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% certain. Approximately.

I believe that humanity generally believes sex is shameful and that this belief is incorrect. I think humanity's shame of sex is displayed by the word 'Pudenda' which means the genitals (especially a female's) and 'the shameful parts'. Society sees pornography, which is sexual images as shameful, and prostitution, which is sex integrated into the economy, as shameful. I believe pornography should be valued and viewed positively and prostitutes should be viewed with respect and highly valued in society. I believe the right for adults to decide what drugs they wish to take is fundamental and should be protected. I view laws against adults taking drugs as evil.

I think irresponsibility is human beings believing sex is shameful and drug taking is immoral as both of these beliefs arise from insecurity and selfishness.

 

[masterjedijared]

So basically you're a nymphomanic pot-head who's gotten high way too many times.

This thread makes so much more sense now.

 

[lrkun]

So basically you're a nymphomanic pot-head who's gotten high way too many times.

This thread makes so much more sense now.

Hmmm, maybe that's why he think he's Jesus.

I appreciate your pity Irkun.

If you think my theory is nonsense austra that's fine but your opinion doesn't interest me. If there is someone who actually has a doctorate in theoretical physics or cosmology or astrophysics or something then I would be more interested in that.

Dear Irkun. I never wrote that we should have sex or drugs more and I definitely didn't write that we should be violent more.

I don't know anything Irkun. I don't know 2+2 = 4 I'm just 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% certain. Approximately.

I believe that humanity generally believes sex is shameful and that this belief is incorrect. I think humanity's shame of sex is displayed by the word 'Pudenda' which means the genitals (especially a female's) and 'the shameful parts'. Society sees pornography, which is sexual images as shameful, and prostitution, which is sex integrated into the economy, as shameful. I believe pornography should be valued and viewed positively and prostitutes should be viewed with respect and highly valued in society. I believe the right for adults to decide what drugs they wish to take is fundamental and should be protected. I view laws against adults taking drugs as evil.

I think irresponsibility is human beings believing sex is shameful and drug taking is immoral as both of these beliefs arise from insecurity and selfishness.

If you're Jesus, you don't have to believe you are him, you must know that you're him, that's why I'm emphasizing the necessity for certainty.

With respect to sex, I mentioned it, because it is pleasurable. If done responsibly, then this is a good thing, but if done irresponsibly, then it would be a danger to one partner and the other as well as the consequences for doing so.

With regards to drugs, I am refering to illegal drugs. These drugs lessen a person's self-control and makes such addicted to it. A good example is heroine. The reason why I find your comment irresponsible is the fact that if one is addicted to drugs, it can be used as a means to control him or her, at the same time, different harmful effects will happen to the user. (this is something you should have learned in gradeschool).

It's really important that you exercise a degree of care for your fellow forum members. Even if this topic is a joke, it's very irresponsible.

 

[masterjedijared]

Tim Knight, the Second Reefing

 

[Timothy]

It isn't a joke.

Alcohol is a psychologically addictive drug and it is the only drug where the physical addiction is so severe withdrawl can kill. Do you think that should be illegal?

I'm not Jesus I'm Tim Knight.

I did first develop my belief that I am the Messiah after I had smoked some cannabis. Cannabis gave me increased awareness that allowed me to recognise my identity as the Second Coming of Christ.

 

[lrkun]

It isn't a joke.

Alcohol is a psychologically addictive drug and it is the only drug where the physical addiction is so severe withdrawl can kill. Do you think that should be illegal?

I'm not Jesus I'm Tim Knight.

I did first develop my belief that I am the Messiah after I had smoked some cannabis. Cannabis gave me increased awareness that allowed me to recognise my identity as the Second Coming of Christ.

The issue is not the legality of something, I was refering to it's effect. Just because it is legal, does not mean I support it. Please know the difference between the two.

So you're Tim Knight, the Second coming of Christ. So who's the first? Is it not Jesus? Or are you refering to another Christ?

You smoked cannabis, in effect you became aware that you're the Second Coming. Are you sure, that it's not because you're just high at that time?

 

[australopithecus]

I did first develop my belief that I am the Messiah after I had smoked some cannabis. Cannabis gave me increased awareness that allowed me to recognise my identity as the Second Coming of Christ.

If you think my theory is nonsense austra that's fine but your opinion doesn't interest me. If there is someone who actually has a doctorate in theoretical physics or cosmology or astrophysics or something then I would be more interested in that.

You don't have a theory, you have (seemingly) a cannabis enduced delusion. You can go off and find someone with a doctorate in physics if you like, though they'll tell you the same thing. Actually, they'd probably ignore you for being batshit insane.

 

[masterjedijared]

It isn't a joke.

No, it really is. Its unfortunate that you're not laughing with us.

(If not a Poe)

 

[Timothy]

I was just asking you a question Irkun. Do you think alcohol should be illegal or not?

Jesus of Nazereth was the First Coming of Christ. I am Tim Knight the Second Coming of Christ.

I'm a biological organism. Cannabis is a powerful consciousness altering drug. I'd been using cannabis for a long time to try and work out what the meaning of life was. Smoking cannabis at that time allowed me to realise that I am the meaning of life.

You should speak for yourself austra. You don't have a doctorate in physics so you don't know what someone with a doctorate in physics would say to me.

 

[Nemesiah]

I was just asking you a question Irkun. Do you think alcohol should be illegal or not?

Jesus of Nazereth was the First Coming of Christ. I am Tim Knight the Second Coming of Christ.

I'm a biological organism. Cannabis is a powerful consciousness altering drug. I'd been using cannabis for a long time to try and work out what the meaning of life was. Smoking cannabis at that time allowed me to realise that I am the meaning of life.

You should speak for yourself austra. You don't have a doctorate in physics so you don't know what someone with a doctorate in physics would say to me.

I'd been using cannabis for a long time

Indeed

 

[australopithecus]

You should speak for yourself austra. You don't have a doctorate in physics so you don't know what someone with a doctorate in physics would say to me.

I can hazard a pretty accurate guess. Why should someone with that level of knowledge have to sit down and babysit every crackpot with an idea about something they clearly know nothing about? You're clearly grossly ill informed as to the basics of cosmology and they will tell you exactly the same thing as we have told you because they're working with the exact same evidence we are.

The universe isn't imploding, it's as much a fact as the earth orbiting the sun. I don't know how you arrived at this bullshit, oh...wait, yes I do, you were stoned at the time. Contrary to what you and your cannibrethren may believe, weed doesn't increase your awareness, it turns people into tools who, as you prove quite well, talk bollocks. You're talking bollocks. Stop getting high and do something with your life.

I have no idea why you came here, 'reason' doesn't mean 'things I think' it means objectively approaching questions about reality and answering them honestly and without bias. You're in the wrong place if you think you were going to get a free pass with your bullshit.

That said, you're probably a Poe.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

Dear Anach, nothing travels faster than light, so the first thing we will detect from the imploding universe is the light. Because the universe is imploding at almost the speed of light we will not see the light until the implosive energy is almost upon us.

Actually the first thing we would detect would be the end of the increase in red-shift, as space is no longer expanding. This has not occurred, thus conclusively proving your understanding of cosmology false.

 

[masterjedijared]

You should speak for yourself austra. You don't have a doctorate in physics so you don't know what someone with a doctorate in physics would say to me.

One doesn't need a doctorate in anything to see you're totally bonkers. It only takes a rudimentary collegial course in cosmology to know you don't know what you're talking about regarding your view of the cosmos.

 

[Timothy]

You seem paranoid that I'm a 'poe' austra. If you're so terrorfied you might be communicating with a Poe then don't write to me any more.

My theory on the universe integrates the universe with me, Jesus, the rest of humanity, Earth and Paradise. It explains the universe as a cyclical being. You're out of your depth stating that it is a fact that the universe isn't imploding. It's a theory I'm offering that only a properly qualified physicist can deny with any credibility.

Same goes for you Anach. You don't hold a PhD in physics, unless I'm mistaken. The expansive movement of the universe continues so the red shift doesn't change. The implosion has no effect on the momentum of objects until it reaches them and destroys them.

 

[Timothy]

So you're a psychiatrist as well as a cosmologist masterjed?

 

[Zoten001]

You seem paranoid that I'm a 'poe' austra. If you're so terrorfied you might be communicating with a Poe then don't write to me any more.

My theory on the universe integrates the universe with me, Jesus, the rest of humanity, Earth and Paradise. It explains the universe as a cyclical being. You're out of your depth stating that it is a fact that the universe isn't imploding. It's a theory I'm offering that only a properly qualified physicist can deny with any credibility.

Same goes for you Anach. You don't hold a PhD in physics, unless I'm mistaken. The expansive movement of the universe continues so the red shift doesn't change. The implosion has no effect on the momentum of objects until it reaches them and destroys them.

Funny, I'm pretty sure both Hawking and Kaku would disagree with you there. I've heard them both state that the universe is still in a constant state of expansion. You fail.

 

[australopithecus]

You seem paranoid that I'm a 'poe' austra. If you're so terrorfied you might be communicating with a Poe then don't write to me any more.

Like you're the first and only troll I've ever encountered. I couldn't care less if you are or not, you're a tool either way. That's not my problem.

My theory on the universe integrates the universe with me, Jesus, the rest of humanity, Earth and Paradise.

YOU DON'T HAVE A THEORY.

You're out of your depth stating that it is a fact that the universe isn't imploding. It's a theory I'm offering that only a properly qualified physicist can deny with any credibility.

No, anyone who studied physics at a high school level can deny your nonsense with any credibilty. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

The expansive movement of the universe continues so the red shift doesn't change. The implosion has no effect on the momentum of objects until it reaches them and destroys them.

You've ignored everything you've been told which is why you're either an idiot, stoned, a poe or all 3.

There is no edge to the universe, if there was it would no travel at the speed of light because anything capale of colliding with something else would need mass and objects with mass do not travel at the speed of light. I already explained to you the universe isn't like a fishbowl with everything contained in the middle of a membrane, it's akin to dots on a balloon, everything is on the membrane. If the universe was implding then we weould detect massive blue shifting. We don't.

You've yet to explain exactly how this implosion is occuring given that an implosion requires a greater external force than there is an internal force.

In fact you've yet to give any evidence at all. You dont have a hypothesis let alone a theory.