D
Deleted member 619
Guest
leroy said:
Where have I said that I don't believe in will?
You really are the worst of trolls. Fuck off.
-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
Where have I said that I don't believe in will?
You really are the worst of trolls. Fuck off.
Collecemall
Member
I've seen some obtuse people in my life. Leroy, you take the crown. Congrats. Now please just go away.
leroy said:
Leroy.
You.
You are evidence against religion.
Your claim seems to be to have found an ever-loving God, but all that seems to have done is make you into the most despicable of people.
You are vile and empty.
Oh, and you are also
BANNED!
Collecemall
Member
And that response is EXACTLY why I asked you to go away. You're beyond thick. Please just go.
he_who_is_nobody
Well-Known Member
Sparhafoc said:
There really was nothing to it.
leroy said:
To bad dandan/leroy is banned, but this is still worth pointing out. Beyond that, dandan/leroy might come back with another username that will be easy enough to see through.
Where in that above quote is hackenslash denying/affirming free will or will? Dandan/Leroy asked a question, hackenslash evaded it, then dandan/leroy asked again, and hackenslash evaded it again. At no point did hackenslash admit to a belief or lack of belief. What dandan/leroy was trying to prove with the above quotes is beyond me. Perhaps, just once again demonstrating the poor reading comprehension that is dandan/leroy's trademark.
Greg the Grouper
Active Member
he_who_is_nobody said:
I'm compelled to ask why leroy would ask the question in the first place. It's not as if the act of killing oneself is going to change if one doesn't technically possess free will.
he_who_is_nobody
Well-Known Member
psikhrangkur said:
Because he is scum. After getting back from the field and seeing that dandan/leroy was banned, I was going to ask that he be reinstated with perhaps at most a temporary ban. However, seeing the context of why he was banned was enlightening. Honestly, it would be like if a Christian posted a blog about how they almost took their own life, and someone else on this forum responding with, "Why would you do that since that means you would go to hell? Guess you really do not have faith in your religion." It is just insensitive and done to score points. However, there is no score board anywhere, thus taking the low road in this is completely pointless and exposes the true colors of a person. He has demonstrated himself to be a liar (which I have a very high tolerance of), but this demonstrates that he is scum of the lowest order. I see no reason to tolerate that.
psikhrangkur said:
I am not sure if you had many exchanges with LEROY or read his exchanges with others, but if you had it would quickly have become clear. LEROY always wants to work towards an agenda and never lets anyone freely express their opinion - he always wants to control what they can or can't say, and will just make up your position for you even when it is diametrically opposite to what you wrote.
The only problem with this rendition is that it makes LEROY seem like a cunning master manipulator, but in reality, he tried all the above without possessing even a shred of competence. As with the quote above - there never was any logic behind these ploys, no rhetorical symposium artfully crafted - it was just drooling bullshit stacked over and over for dozens of pages.
he_who_is_nobody said:
I very, very rarely allow myself to believe that the persona I'm engaged with on the internet is reflective of the real person sitting at the computer. They may act an ass online, but I assume they're good people to those around them, and contribute meaningfully to the welfare of people in their lives.
But LEROY's endless lying makes that a dubious proposition. Someone so thoroughly lacking in conscience, honesty, integrity and the likes can't be putting this shit on or the good real person would feel awful. LEROY was repeatedly given the chance to engage meaningfully here on a variety of topics, and he never failed to disappoint.
Sadly, I concur. Events like the above are not one-offs with LEROY: he's scum.
Jason Boreu
New Member
I hope Tree don't end up sharing the same fate as Dandan/Leroy as i find his projections of his personal prejudices unto reality highly entertaining :lol:
psikhrangkur said:
Because Suicide implies that you had a choice, if you kill yourselfe as a concecuence of an involuntary reflex nobody would call it suicide
The problem is that "freely expressing your opinion" implies that you are granting free will (or will)
So do you grant that we have will? yes or no?
Prediction> once again you will not respond with a simple yes or a simple no,
...….in this context free will is being defined as the ability to make choices
Greg the Grouper
Active Member
back said:
It implies that you killed yourself, intentionally, without being pressured by other people into doing so. Free will is irrelevant.