BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
As a generality I believe things outside the norm are negative/bad. I already argued this point though. People should be aware of the fact that I don't believe in absolute arguments. I am considering the topic in regards to context and basis of MAJORITY and MINORITY.Your problem is that you think that something that is not normal is therefore somehow 'bad', at least when it's something you don't like. I've demonstrated how this is extreme breathtakinginanity again and again and again. The few objections you've raised to those were also breathtakinginanity as I've also demonstrated, and the objections to those too were breathtakinginanity as I demonstrated, which you failed to address.
If you are unsure of what I mean then ask clarifiers otherwise you'll rely on other context assumptions which may or may not be correct of my opinion.
No one has proven bigotry. Burden of proof is on you or anyone claiming bigotry on my part in order to legitimately claim bigotry.Your problem with gays is you don't like them and have to concoct various ways to demean and vilify them to mask your bigotry, but your concoctions only serve to prove it. [There's likely a lot of great cock jokes there but I'm too tired to go there]
"a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person"
You have to prove that it is unfair in order to dislike people based sexually deviant or harmful behavior. I believe I gave the example of dudes giving head and jacking each other off in public (gay pride parade). Is it unfair of me to levy intolerance of public sexual acts? Yes or no?
Also it has to be established that this is a strongly held opinion. That is at ODDS with the fact that I have gay friends and in fact tolerate them. If they are my friends do I like them?
So really the dislike/hate one could argue is that it is reserved for very limited aspects of gays and the like. So really I call bs on the claim of bigot.