• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

THE MOST SOPHISTICATED MASTERPIECE OF DEMOLITION

arg-fallbackName="Lallapalalable"/>
Waza-Minooo44 said:
"We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners."
Too bad the impacts referred to were of hypothetical jet liners lost in the fog, traveling at apporach speed, and would have dumped all excess fuel to avoid exactly what happened on 9/11.

Just question why the twin towers and building 7 falls symmetrically ???
Do you mean why did they fall straight down instead of toppling over? If so, that is because gravity only pulls things towards the ground in a straight line. Tower 2 did, actually, start to lean to the east before the steel collumns failed, and then, as gravity dictated, it fell directly downwards. I would actually be suspicious myself if they just toppled.
 
arg-fallbackName="Finger"/>
Waza-Minooo44 said:
I NEED TIME TO RESPOND ..... THIS IS TOTALLY UNFAIR :x
You're the one who brought up a very broad range of subjects. We're merely responding to all of them, rather than choosing only one or two (as you are probably used to.) The rapid-fire approach may work on forums where the crazy outnumber the sane, but here it seems to have backfired. You've bitten off more than you can chew and are now complaining that this is "unfair"? Bullshit! This is exactly why Joe asked you before to post what you thought was the single best piece of evidence for your position, so that we could remain focused and so you wouldn't be overwhelmed by the flurry of responses. But you pretty much ignored him.

You came here to pick a fight, and you got one. Deal with the consequences like a grown-up.
 
arg-fallbackName="borrofburi"/>
y'all seem to have forgotten that this is the same waza minoo who has so much trouble with the english language he can't understand that dictionaries describe how we use words, not prescribe how we MUST use words.
 
arg-fallbackName="justsomefnguy"/>
Waza-Minooo44 said:
I NEED TIME TO RESPOND ..... THIS IS TOTALLY UNFAIR :x


You and your cognitavely impaired friends have had nine years to build a case, if you can't convince even such a small sampling of generally rationale people by now, you never will.

Normally, I'd have some small amount of sympathy for the sort of dogpile you are experiencing, but not in this case. The so-called 'evidence' of a grand conspiracy to bring down the towers and hide the evidence has be thoroughly debunked. Repeatedly.

Add to that the emotional nature of this event,and the implied disrespect to the people those that lost their lives and I've got nothing but contempt for you and anybody else that engages in this sort of irrational speculation on the subject.
 
arg-fallbackName="Lallapalalable"/>
'xactly. I could see this passing as a structurally sound argument in 2003, when the details were still quite fuzzy. But six years have passed since we found out the important things, the things that make said arguments totally useless. Yet you continue to use them.

Tell me, should I fire that 18th century musket my grandfather has in his study?
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
If you're feeling picked upon Waza, I could argue on your side.

I would, of course, be lying through my teeth, and there's a strong possibility I might knowingly undermine your position; but at least you wouldn't be quite so outnumbered.


Barring this, I suggest you focus on just one response and deal with that. Pick whatever you think to be the easiest to counter. We do, of course, understand that you're one person.
 
arg-fallbackName="IBSpify"/>
so is his silence a note that given the time to actually research his claims he found them all to be bupkis or is a sign that the end times are upon us because a conspiracy theorist finally shut up.
 
arg-fallbackName="borrofburi"/>
nasher168 said:
Five days... I don't think he's coming back...
Prove me wrong, Waza.
He'll come back, eventually... we've seen him do this before; you remember, when he re-insisted that atheist means someone who believes god can't exist? What will surprise me is if he hears *any* critique of any of his arguments and modifies them in any way that doesn't suggest a deep dogmatic certainty and confirmation bias.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 1004"/>
Probably crawled back into Alex Jones' arse crack.

Meh... it's a shame when they do a runner.
 
arg-fallbackName="Waza-Minooo44"/>
It has been proven by professional and Archtercher . The plane wasn't the real cause ..... because the twin tower can hold more than one airplane .

This is the documentary . This documentary i guess it's the latest one .

 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
We're not watching another bullshit video dude. Make a case or don't.

If you believe this bullshit, it means that you should understand it. If you understand it, then make your own case, instead of posting a video.
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
Mate, you have to actually address our objections.

Just endlessly linking to videos that provide essentially the same, already rebutted, arguments falls somewhere between sophomoric and spam.
 
arg-fallbackName="Waza-Minooo44"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
We're not watching another bullshit video dude. Make a case or don't.

If you believe this bullshit, it means that you should understand it. If you understand it, then make your own case, instead of posting a video.


This entire documentary is evidence. But I suppose you want proof? The presence of Powdered Aluminium and Iron Oxide, Sulphur and Barium in the dust from the collapsed towers is proof of the, military grade Thermate. The only question that remains is: Who put it there?
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
Waza-Minooo44 said:
This entire documentary is evidence. But I suppose you want proof? The presence of Powdered Aluminium and Iron Oxide, Sulphur and Barium in the dust from the collapsed towers is proof of the, military grade Thermate. The only question that remains is: Who put it there?
Why do you keep repeating that nonsense? It isn't true, the one paper is bunk published by non-experts where they make stuff up, no one uses thermite for demolitions, you can't explain why this super thermite didn't catch on fire as soon as the buildings were soaked in jet fuel and caught on fire...


We've debunked your bogus claim, so please PLEASE stop repeating it!
 
arg-fallbackName="Finger"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
We've debunked your bogus claim, so please PLEASE stop repeating it!
Perhaps he thinks that if he repeats it enough times it'll become true.
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
Finger said:
ImprobableJoe said:
We've debunked your bogus claim, so please PLEASE stop repeating it!
Perhaps he thinks that if he repeats it enough times it'll become true.
The same way that red paint and rust becomes thermite if you hide it from expert chemists for long enough?

You can tell no Twoofer has clue one about thermite, let alone super magic fireproof thermite.
 
Back
Top