THE MOST SOPHISTICATED MASTERPIECE OF DEMOLITION

[Waza-Minooo44]

Today i watch roughly all the videos about 9/11 . But there are Superstition things , unbelievable things happened on that day .... IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AT ALL .....

Q 1) when the nano-Thermite first discovered ?

Q 2) How come none of the 19"²s names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

Q 3) How can the twin tower fall within 6.5 seconds ? and by "two airplanes" ? does it make sense ?

Q 4) How did building 7 fall down on its own footprint with no apparent reason ???

Q 5) According to Frank de Martini, WTC's construction manager he said "We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners." The second plane almost missed tower 1; most of the fuel burned in an explosion outside the tower. Yet this tower fall down first, long before tower 2 that was perforated by the first hit. Jet fuel burned up fast and by far did not reach the 2000-degree heat necessary to hurt the six tubular steel columns in the center of the tower designed specifically to keep the towers from collapsing even if hit by a Boeing 707. A Boeing 707 used to carry more fuel than the Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 that actually hit the towers.

Q 6) How can a group of people in the cave (in Afghanistan) can create and design the most sophisticated masterpiece of demolition (Nano-Thermite) ???

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge or is he psychic?

Q 8) And finally what is the real REASON for evading Afghanistan ???

 

[Aught3]

As this topic is about alternative explanations for 9/11, I have moved it to the conspiracy theory forum.

 

[australopithecus]

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge or is he psychic?

This one's easy. Bush is an idiot.

 

[Waza-Minooo44]

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge or is he psychic?

This one's easy. Bush is an idiot.

I want real answer . How can an idiot knows the future ??

 

[ImprobableJoe]

I want real answer . How can an idiot knows the future ??

He didn't know the future. What the hell are you talking about?

 

[ImprobableJoe]

BTW, here's the flaw in your whole proposition: if we don't answer your questions, you don't get to claim a conspiracy. You have to present POSITIVE EVIDENCE for the conspiracy, instead of arguments from ignorance and incredulity.

 

[Waza-Minooo44]

I want real answer . How can an idiot knows the future ??

He didn't know the future. What the hell are you talking about?

i will tell you .....

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge ???

 

[ImprobableJoe]

i will tell you .....

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge ???

He didn't see the first plane crash live. He was just wrong/stupid/misremembered things. He didn't have any previous knowledge, and your conspiracy theory is fucking stupid.

 

[Prolescum]

i will tell you .....

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge ???

He was almost pathologically incapable of thinking and speaking at the same time.

[centre][/centre]

No conspiracy, just an odd, odd man.

 

[ImprobableJoe]

He was almost pathologically incapable of thinking and speaking at the same time.

[centre][/centre]

No conspiracy, just an odd, odd man.

Conspiracy theorists are pathologically incapable of accepting the existence of accidents, mistakes, or coincidences. They accept any dishonest nonsense that supports their bullshit, like "nano-thermite" that no one but their fellow nuts seem to find, while rejecting all of the real evidence as being part of the conspiracy.

 

[Prolescum]

True, and I've witnessed Waza's debating style before...

 

[ImprobableJoe]

True, and I've witnessed Waza's debating style before...

That's a style? Assertion without evidence? And don't tell me, if you don't take his posts seriously he later claims that it is because he's smarter than everyone else and declares victory?

 

[IBSpify]

Today i watch roughly all the videos about 9/11 . But there are Superstition things , unbelievable things happened on that day .... IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AT ALL .....

Q 1) when the nano-Thermite first discovered ?

Q 2) How come none of the 19"²s names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

Q 3) How can the twin tower fall within 6.5 seconds ? and by "two airplanes" ? does it make sense ?

Q 4) How did building 7 fall down on its own footprint with no apparent reason ???

Q 5) According to Frank de Martini, WTC's construction manager he said "We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners." The second plane almost missed tower 1; most of the fuel burned in an explosion outside the tower. Yet this tower fall down first, long before tower 2 that was perforated by the first hit. Jet fuel burned up fast and by far did not reach the 2000-degree heat necessary to hurt the six tubular steel columns in the center of the tower designed specifically to keep the towers from collapsing even if hit by a Boeing 707. A Boeing 707 used to carry more fuel than the Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 that actually hit the towers.

Q 6) How can a group of people in the cave (in Afghanistan) can create and design the most sophisticated masterpiece of demolition (Nano-Thermite) ???

Q 7) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge or is he psychic?

Q 8) And finally what is the real REASON for evading Afghanistan ???

A1) Nano thermite was never actually found, one conspiricy theorist claims that he found traces of nano thermite however he does not see any of the traces of nano thermite that would be there for no reason other then the use of thermite, thus thus he didn't actually find nano thermite he found paint chips and he blew everything out of proportion and got gullible people to believe him.

A2) Is it really out of the question that they used fake names for their boarding passes?

A3) They did not fall withing 6.5 seconds, try watching a video that actually has a counter up as they collapse it takes longer then 6 seconds, as for why they fall at the speed they do, gravity

A4) The building did not fall within it's own foot print really, and it was not for no reason, building 7 was hit by debris by the other 2 towers, suffered major structural damage and had sustained fires due to a broken water main that prevent the sprinklers from working, at some point when the fire fighters fighting the fire in building 7 say that the building is going to collapse due to the fire that they are unable to put out we have to believe the fire fighters at the scene over somebody analyzing footage that was taken from blocks away 2 years after the event.


A5) You are aware that there are items inside of office buildings that do burn correct? Cheap office furniture and laptop batteries burn at extremely hot temperatures, and the fires can last for quite awhile.

A6) They didn't, there was no nano thermite used, you've been taken in by people trying to pawn a conspiracy theory off on you.

A7) He didn't, Bush has said a lot of stupid things, this wouldn't be the first time he messed up a public speaking engagement.

A8) since we currently have troops in Afghanistan I'm going to assume you meant "invading" instead of "evading", at the time the idea was to go after the Taliban which was thought to be hiding in the surrounding area, as for why we're still there, that's a separate question.

 

[ImprobableJoe]

Oh, and let's not forget the fact that no one uses thermite for demolition in any case. It is just a sillier-than-normal part of the conspiracy nonsense.

 

[Prolescum]

True, and I've witnessed Waza's debating style before...

That's a style? Assertion without evidence? And don't tell me, if you don't take his posts seriously he later claims that it is because he's smarter than everyone else and declares victory?

It's a style in the way fathers dancing at weddings is a style of dancing. There are enough people (fathers) who think it's fine...

 

[Waza-Minooo44]

A1) Nano thermite was never actually found, one conspiricy theorist claims that he found traces of nano thermite however he does not see any of the traces of nano thermite that would be there for no reason other then the use of thermite, thus thus he didn't actually find nano thermite he found paint chips and he blew everything out of proportion and got gullible people to believe him.

First of all, I'm Anti-conspiracy theory , i'm not those who believe in what the media says, if you thing for one moment that a group of people in a cave done this job then you have been deceived . Second thing, I'm asking why the molten iron was pouring ???? and finally , where are your proofs ????

They did not fall withing 6.5 seconds, try watching a video that actually has a counter up as they collapse it takes longer then 6 seconds, as for why they fall at the speed they do, gravity

it's Freefall Speed , can't you see ???

A4) The building did not fall within it's own foot print really, and it was not for no reason, building 7 was hit by debris by the other 2 towers, suffered major structural damage and had sustained fires due to a broken water main that prevent the sprinklers from working, at some point when the fire fighters fighting the fire in building 7 say that the building is going to collapse due to the fire that they are unable to put out we have to believe the fire fighters at the scene over somebody analyzing footage that was taken from blocks away 2 years after the event.

i agree with you that it was hit by debris by the other 2 towers. But you said something MORE AMAZING....... Prepare for the shock .

i'm quoting you

at some point when the fire fighters fighting the fire in building 7 say that the building is going to collapse due to the fire that they are unable to put out we have to believe the fire fighters at the scene

Do you know why ??? because the cause was from nano-thermite . Nono-thermite(super thermite) have the capability to cut down a heavy metal into pieces because in order to cut down a heavy metal it requires high temperate maybe around 3000 C . Nano-thermite have the capability of doing this job and by the way it takes month to put down the nano thermite . The fire fighter thought's it's fire but the fact is that it's a nano-thermite .

A5) You are aware that there are items inside of office buildings that do burn correct? Cheap office furniture and laptop batteries burn at extremely hot temperatures, and the fires can last for quite awhile.

Super Thermite can burn even the heavy metals and break it down into aches without leaving any traces behind. And by the way do you know that it tooks three month to take down fire ??? is that even possible ?

A6) They didn't, there was no nano thermite used, you've been taken in by people trying to pawn a conspiracy theory off on you.

where are your proofs ??? what are you talking is no more than conjecture . Deceived by Superstition media .

A8) since we currently have troops in Afghanistan I'm going to assume you meant "invading" instead of "evading", at the time the idea was to go after the Taliban which was thought to be hiding in the surrounding area, as for why we're still there, that's a separate question.

Really ?

Helen Thomas Asks President Obama Why We Are Still In Afghanistan



And think twice can a group of people in a cave have the capability to create and design a Super-Thermite ??? What i'm saying is i don't know the REAL REASON why America want to invade Afghanistan but i can only guess it's because of oil . America want to invade but they don't have the clear evidence like in Iran . They want to invade Iran without a SHREAD of evidence . That's why they come up with new idea called "The Twin Tower" .

 

[SchrodingersFinch]

Second thing, I'm asking why the molten iron was pouring ????

"none of these stories prove there was molten (as in liquid) steel at the WTC. There's no evidence temperatures were hot enough to produce that (whatever the energy source), and some of the stories claiming "molten steel" have built-in implausibilities. There was certainly glowing metal, but this only indicates temperatures within the range of a fire."
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_molten_steel.html

Molten Steel Explained:
http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm

it's Freefall Speed , can't you see ???

It's not.

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

The fire fighter thought's it's fire but the fact is that it's a nano-thermite .

"where are your proofs ????"

America want to invade but they don't have the clear evidence like in Iran . They want to invade Iran without a SHREAD of evidence . That's why they come up with new idea called "The Twin Tower" .

"where are your proofs ????".

 

[Laurens]

I think anybody who believes that the Bush administration would have been capable of carrying out such a vast conspiracy is giving undue credit to a incompetent administration.

Although I guess if you look at how the supposed conspiracy was carried out it does have many flaws and pitfalls. Just imagine the meeting of the officials planning the 9/11 attacks.

"How shall we carry out the attacks?"

"Fly 2 planes into the World Trade Centre, then blow them up!"

"Are you sure? That seems a bit risky for an operation of this nature, I mean after the first plane hits every camera in New York is going to be on those towers, if we make the slightest mistake it will all be there captured on video from all angles, its far too risky to demolish two buildings with all the world's media watching. Perhaps simply flying the planes into the buildings would be enough to achieve our aims? Or perhaps we could attack somewhere that the media won't be hovering round, a military base maybe?..."

"No I give the orders round here! Fly 2 god damn planes into the World Trade Centre, then blow them up!"

[At which point the other guy simply facepalms.]

None of the conspiracy makes any sense. What purpose would demolishing the towers have served other than increasing the risk of detection? A conspiracy, especially one involving mass murder would never take such unnecessary risks. That would be like planning to murder someone in broad daylight, in a crowded street with cameras pointed at you. No sane person would take such a risk. It's utterly stupid.

 

[Laurens]

Here's a few videos I made:




The second video shows the unedited footage of WTC 7's collapse which shows it actually fell in around 13 seconds. You have been feed selectively edited versions of the footage that make it appear to collapse much faster that it actually did.

 

[Nautyskin]

He didn't see the first plane crash live. He was just wrong/stupid/misremembered things. He didn't have any previous knowledge, and your conspiracy theory is fucking stupid.

This here is truth.