Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gnug215 said:A shooting-the-breeze show could be fine, but that would depend highly on the hosts.
We'd need some really, really fun and interesting people as hosts for that, and we don't really have that around here, do we?
More in a `laughing at` than `laughing with` way...CosmicJoghurt said:Gnug215 said:A shooting-the-breeze show could be fine, but that would depend highly on the hosts.
We'd need some really, really fun and interesting people as hosts for that, and we don't really have that around here, do we?
Don't be modest, Gnug. You're more than funny.
ImprobableJoe said:Prolescum said:No, not quite. I think lighthearted is the correct general direction, though. I mean, come on, League of Reason?
Recorded live from the Hall of Logic!
Gnug215 said:We'd need some really, really fun and interesting people as hosts for that, and we don't really have that around here, do we?
I agree, Gnug is definitely a funny bugger.CosmicJoghurt said:Don't be modest, Gnug. You're more than funny.Gnug215 said:We'd need some really, really fun and interesting people as hosts for that, and we don't really have that around here, do we?
You say that in jest, but you've never seen my wife eat soup with those little oyster crackers. Or more accurately she eats the crackers with enough soup to moisten them and not much else.televator said:Today's topic: Where do atheists get their etiquette from? How do you know what fork to use with your soup?
Aught3 said:Doing something different to what's already out there is always the biggest challenge...
Aught3 said:I like the idea of having a rotating panel to try and get more voices involved without having too many on a single show. Maybe a host plus 2 or 3 other people is a good number?
Doing something different to what's already out there is always the biggest challenge...
)O( Hytegia )O( said:How about make the show with panels involving both Atheists and Religious people where it's not a dog-eat-dog fiasco?
Welshidiot said:"Iiiiit's opening niiigghhhttt!! Ahhh the roar of the grease-paint, the smell of the crowd.....Did I ever tell you about the time I actually met Judy, at Steven Sondheim's apaarrrrtment? Dahling, it was simply deeevine!"
nasher168 said:That's a pretty good idea... might make a nice little background thing. Even for unimportant, "just chatting" type stuff it could conceivably have some use if one of the speakers is talking about a topic that could do with a picture.
nasher168 said:iTunes is definitely a must, as is YouTube. I've never heard of Miro before, will have to look at that...
nasher168 said:We have that on record, we'll have to take you up with that
)o(Hytegia)o( said:Idea for a show:
Asshole day.
Gnug215 said:What would you specifically suggest the show did?
Aught3 said:It's probably a good idea not to worry about editing it at first, unless someone is really keen. It takes a lot of effort and might end up being the biggest delay to posting new episodes. An intro and an outro is easy enough, but going through each show and deciding what to keep and what to delete will be a pain.
Yeah, like Apologia! But actually it would be interesting to take a more in-depth look at some of the other religions out there, I'm thinking Buddhism, Daoism, Kemetic paganism, etc, etc)O( Hytegia )O( said:How about make the show with panels involving both Atheists and Religious people where it's not a dog-eat-dog fiasco? "Rational Religion" is kinda contradictory, but I think that it works well enough for what we have going on here.
I think even the type of show you are describing would work better with a host. Just someone to move everyone on to the next topic and to cut off arguments that aren't going anywhere. On the other hand maybe you could try out a couple of test shows just to see how well everything flows.nasher168 said:I don't see that there necessarily has to be a set host as such for a show. It could work quite well if everyone knows they should try and cover, say, four items over a 45 minute - 1 hour skype call
televator said:How do you know what fork to use with your soup?
Aught3 said:I think even the type of show you are describing would work better with a host. Just someone to move everyone on to the next topic and to cut off arguments that aren't going anywhere. On the other hand maybe you could try out a couple of test shows just to see how well everything flows.
ImprobableJoe said:"Fortnight"? Are you planning on doing this by carrier pigeon? :lol:
CosmicJoghurt said:Gnug215 said:A shooting-the-breeze show could be fine, but that would depend highly on the hosts.
We'd need some really, really fun and interesting people as hosts for that, and we don't really have that around here, do we?
Don't be modest, Gnug. You're more than funny.
ImprobableJoe said:More in a `laughing at` than `laughing with` way...