UNFFwildcard
New Member
australopithecus said:That's the point there is no 'on the behalf of the LoR'. This is just a forum we turn up and post in, aside from that fact there is no collective, AW cannot do anything on our behalf because we are not a collective entity, we're just a bunch of people posting on a forum. We may agree on some things, we disagree on others. We can't be spoken for as a whole.
You would like to think that there is no 'behalf of the LoR'. But it's not what you think, but what others think.
australopithecus said:How others perceive things only matters to those people. We can't or shouldn't be held hostage to every fallacious conclusion that people dream up. I just watched your video, and I tend to agree that DMD was a such a victory, mostly because for every person like myself who entered into the day with non-offensive images on Mohammed, there were 100 trolls seriously trying to cause shit. And I can see how TF's videos would be seen as very antagonistic, but the fact remains people on this forum called him on it, and if anyone wants to criticise us for something he did while ignoring our criticisms then they're the ones at fault, not us.
No, we shouldn't be held hostage to every fallacious conclusion that people dream up. But we should at least try to take healthy precautions and adjust our behaviour according to what we predict will get the desired results with the least amount of trouble.
UNFFwildcard said:If LoR show is not actually a LoR product (as I disputed in the above post), then AW needs to emphasize that clearly. And it must also be emphasized clearly that the opinions of the LoR show guests are exclusively those of the guests.
australopithecus said:Why? So people with more teeth than brain cells don't leap to false conclusions? AW shouldn't need to spell everything out in 6ft high neon letters just so people 'get it'.
Yes, that's exactly why AW should do it. If AW did it, this subject probably wouldn't have garnered 12 pages worth of arguments.