Jason101 aka Jason Burn's paper discussion thread.

[Vivre]

I'd just like to take this opportunity to say thank you to Jason. If it wasn't for him I would not have found this forum.

dito
and all the other unwanted shoutouts he gives

oh well - still I'm really sorry for Jason and those many people alike who dare not face the truth of emptyness ... and wished they'd rather turn to enjoy their gifts and make life a peacefull experience as can.

thus it wouldn't surprise me if the ride on the changing wind continues

 

[WalkingFish]

I think it's funny that all of the tactics that he's used in the past to prevent him from offering up evidence are just not working on this form. Unfortunately the next thing that he will try to do is claim that he is being threatened by somebody and has to leave the internet. Or he will say that his family is not allowing him to continue in this debate and he has to respect the wishes of his family. So keep an eye out because I'm almost 100% sure that's what's coming.

Called it!
*from the original thread

 

[DingoDave]

Unfortunately the next thing that he will try to do is claim that he is being threatened by somebody and has to leave the internet. Or he will say that his family is not allowing him to continue in this debate and he has to respect the wishes of his family...

Called it!
*from the original thread

At least he has kept his dignity.



- An original Jason Burns exclusive (accept no substitutes)

 

[Gnug215]

Well, now that it's over (ever so unexpectedly!!), will you leave us??

Over? Oh how naive you must be.

My guess is that he needs to deflect attention from the fact that despite all the hours of "documentary" footage, the essays and videos he is unable to hit his self imposed deadline of the 10th April.

Well, you know... when the carneval leaves, many leave with it, but sure, when the carneval (inevitably) comes back, they may or may not return.

 

[*SD*]

Unfortunately the next thing that he will try to do is claim that he is being threatened by somebody and has to leave the internet. Or he will say that his family is not allowing him to continue in this debate and he has to respect the wishes of his family...

Called it!
*from the original thread

At least he has kept his dignity.



- An original Jason Burns exclusive (accept no substitutes)

Man, Scooby Doo is less confused than Jason.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Did anybody seriously expected a different outcome?

 

[*SD*]

Not me, I've seen it all before, and I'm sure that, should I wish to waste more time, I can see it all over again in the not too distant future

 

[TheAtheistJehovah]

I'd like to see some evidence of this 'warning & threat' or 'obstacle of freedom' Jay has come against what has forced him to cut all ties. I wonder what has infringed on his rights to talk about people. :shock:

 

[AronRa]

I'd like to see some evidence of this 'warning & threat' or 'obstacle of freedom' Jay has come against what has forced him to cut all ties. I wonder what has infringed on his rights to talk about people.

When I saw his video comment that he wasn't lying, I couldn't resist posting that yes he was; that when he said that some famous atheist had warned him that if he continued, that we would use unfair 'dirty-handy tactics', that was a bald-faced lie.

I also noticed that he was still boasting that he could take me in a debate. I know I shouldn't have, but I responded to that too, saying, "You couldn't debate me, Jason; you can't even manage a discussion."

 

[AronRa]

Comments are disabled for this video.

What must it be like to worship lies and fear truth so much that you are reduced to this?

 

[Hamster]

Jay has only stopped comments a few times. I was sure I had commented on this video but I could be wrong.

 

[WalkingFish]

At least he has kept his dignity.

"I swear to God I'll pistol-whip the nex guy that says shenanigans."
-Super Troopers

 

[TheAtheistJehovah]

@ AronRA

When I saw his video comment that he wasn't lying, I couldn't resist posting that yes he was; that when he said that some famous atheist had warned him that if he continued, that we would use unfair 'dirty-handy tactics', that was a bald-faced lie.

I also noticed that he was still boasting that he could take me in a debate. I know I shouldn't have, but I responded to that too, saying, "You couldn't debate me, Jason; you can't even manage a discussion."

<i></i>

When Jay accepted a discussion/debate with me a while back and then failed to hold dialogue for the the fifth time (also blocking me for no reason as usual), i stopped making video responses. A subscriber of his told me it's like catching a deer when dealing with Jay, i think this is quite accurate.

I wouldn't say Jay is a bad guy on a personal level, but opinions do drive people against each-others positions quite easily. But I don't think Jay really grasps why people get snotty with him, he seems to forget quite easily his behavior towards people. It seems it's ok for him to block on both YT or Skype and wave the finger at people, but when somebody bites back he's the victim of discrimination and totalitarian YT atheism. People who dish it out should learn to take it and reap what they sew.

Tsarenvy has just been blocked, probably for nothing. Also DingoDavid has been blocked for a long time, just for refuting his claims and creating dialogue.

If somebody is going to block the people who are actually adding to discussion, or stop dialogue by turning off comments, why bother coming on youtube :?: Especially when they want dialogue :!: :geek:

 

[DingoDave]

Well, you know... when the carneval leaves, many leave with it, but sure, when the carneval (inevitably) comes back, they may or may not return.

For Gnug...



You're welcome.

 

[Frenger]

While it is rather amusing that this has all come crashing down in a very obvious and tedious way, I would personally like Jason to elaborate on this so called threat., because from where I'm sitting (not knowing of him previously) it could be taken to mean someone from this forum. We all know this threat is bollocks because no one threatens someone who poses no threat, but I don't want his vague assertion of underhand tactics to be affiliated with this forum.

But, perhaps I'm not giving his viewers the credit they deserve, maybe they can see through this tirade of nonsense, does anyone watch his video for a reason that isn't light relief?

 

[*SD*]

I see Matt Dillahunty is in on the action! (YT comments) All we need now is Jeff Dee, preferably at his grumpiest, and all the ingredients will be there for a nice fireworks display! Please Jason, please, I beg of you, PLEASE tell Matt he needs to read the Bible and then threaten Jeff Dee with "hell" (he likes that).....

Edit - And Jason is now threatening to call the police! We best all shut up before we get arrested......

 

[jskemp1970]

...does anyone watch his video for a reason that isn't light relief?

...Well, no, but to be fair, why would anyone watch any apologist video, if not for shits & giggles ?

The "question" of god's existence hardly qualifies as a question at all, it is such a preposterous proposition (akin, as people have pointed out, to a flying spagetti monster).

I doubt that anyone watching the jason-burns-on-going-train-wreck is "searching for an answer".

My advice, grab some popcorn & a cold beer, put your feet up and enjoy.

Trolling is the only appropriate response to this waste of skin.

 

[tsarenvy]

While it is rather amusing that this has all come crashing down in a very obvious and tedious way, I would personally like Jason to elaborate on this so called threat., because from where I'm sitting (not knowing of him previously) it could be taken to mean someone from this forum. We all know this threat is bollocks because no one threatens someone who poses no threat, but I don't want his vague assertion of underhand tactics to be affiliated with this forum.

But, perhaps I'm not giving his viewers the credit they deserve, maybe they can see through this tirade of nonsense, does anyone watch his video for a reason that isn't light relief?

He seems to intimate on the comments page of his latest video that it is something AronRa has said on this thread that is the 'dirty handed tactic'.

Rizla thinks it might have been Aron's mention of Jay's 'history of violence', something which Jay has discussed openly on a number of occasions.

 

[Visaki]

Good news everyone!

I'm getting on with my paper now so the famous atheists better leave me alone.If they keep doing dirty tactics on me I will publish the evidence.

and

Please note these famous atheists have been asked for live debate,notice they run away but they come back.They come not to debate!So think about it why do they come? They tried to discredit me,but I will get this paper out.So famous athiests you tried to keep me down you tried to discredit me but it will not work and if you push me I got the evidence now.

Both from the comments sections of his "Famous Atheists Intimidate Jason Burns Of YouTube" video (embedded above).

 

[Engelbert]

While it is rather amusing that this has all come crashing down in a very obvious and tedious way, I would personally like Jason to elaborate on this so called threat., because from where I'm sitting (not knowing of him previously) it could be taken to mean someone from this forum. We all know this threat is bollocks because no one threatens someone who poses no threat, but I don't want his vague assertion of underhand tactics to be affiliated with this forum.

But, perhaps I'm not giving his viewers the credit they deserve, maybe they can see through this tirade of nonsense, does anyone watch his video for a reason that isn't light relief?

The threat is rubbish. When he has evidence for bad or perceived bad behaviour, he will usually air it thoroughly and thus sometimes is justified in his taken offence. On this occasion, it is "bollocks" as you rightly say.

"Underhand tactics" is a phrase he wheels out and is applicable to any atheists caught in the line of sight, when such events occur, rightly or wrongly. It could well be related to past comments and events on this forum, some of which were less than savoury, but it is a generic phrase he uses often enough.

He has been a complete let down in a very big and similar way on at least one occasion before and emerged as defiant and determined as ever. I recall a self imposed date that he set for a big showdown on the Magic Sandwich Show, where he was going to have an age defining debate with Aronra and the atheists. Everyone waited for over a month for this spectacle and sure enough he turned up to the chat room of BlogTV on the day, having had several weeks to prepare. He arrived 2 hours early, so the chat room was empty - no moderators, no viewers, no hosts. He then waited making one comment that went unseen for this reason and no attempts to contact the hosts of the show. Over a month of bluster, boasting, advertising, time to prepare and scores of videos preceded this debate date, which he had at no time confirmed with or even notified the MSS. Several awaiting viewers watched the MSS show intently hoping for something to happen, but Jason made one or two comments in the comment box that swiftly disappeared during the show because of the swathes of chatter going on. He then left barely 10 minutes in, because no-one acknowledged him. No attempt was made to contact the admin directly and I would bet that 90% of the people watching had no idea who he was or the significance of that date, let alone the hosts. This momentous day, built up and exclaimed for weeks prior, when scores were going to be settled and a new universal understanding was to be cemented passed without even an exchange of "hello's". It can be directly compared to this deadline day today. Will anything actually happen, or will it pass with less deliverance than a £20 manhood enhancer?

When you watch Jay's next video, you might notice some strings below his arms and waist, holding him down. These are to stop him floating away, because he is so full of hot air. There is a lot of nonsense that comes from Jay. I wonder whether he is just having fun tagging people along for the ride. Make a big event date in a month's time like the burning down of the supermarket, or the death of Dirty Den and everyone will follow to see what happens. That's how soap operas work isn't it? I have little idea what goes through his mind. Perhaps pictures of balloons and jelly.