Jen Martense
New Member
Correct. What's much more conceivable is that a few guys made up the "several hundred eyewitnesses".Kyle Butt said:Analyzing the resurrection of Christ in light of Harris’ filter of evidence, it is “scarcely conceivable” that several hundred eyewitnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6) of the resurrected Christ simply concocted the story to further their agenda.
Correct again. It's more likely a fictional story made up years after any real events it was based on.it is inconceivable that the resurrection of Christ is a hoax.
Assuming the clearly fictional details of the New Testament were real and insisting they be explained on that basis is a red herring. It's not necessary to explain how "several hundred eyewitnesses" "concocted the story" because they didn't. We don't have any of their stories, we have one man telling about the eyewitnesses. They didn't concoct anything because they never existed.