Embarassing things like masturbation.

[Prolescum]

I thought you said Brobding female yanking

I can assure you that at some point in the future, I will be using this phrase :lol:

 

[Andiferous]

Sure, as long as you understand it was borne of confusion.

 

[Welshidiot]

Not terribly clear, especially given the fact that it is impossible for females to successfully yank on anything that might give them normal pleasure.

I have met three women that were clitorally endowed to the point where your statement was not only incorrect in theory, but also (to my certain knowledge) in practice.

 

[Andiferous]

:shock:

 

[CommonEnlightenment]

Not terribly clear, especially given the fact that it is impossible for females to successfully yank on anything that might give them normal pleasure.

I have met three women that were clitorally endowed to the point where your statement was not only incorrect in theory, but also (to my certain knowledge) in practice.

Yeah but what I'm wondering is if one could construct some sort of sling shot device with such 'tools'. :lol:

 

[Prolescum]

Not a terribly practical one.

 

[Welshidiot]

:shock:

"It takes all sorts to make a world..." - Anon

 

[ImprobableJoe]

"It takes all sorts to make a world..." - Anon

Mostly the sorts that aren't too busy masturbating to get anything else done.

 

[nemesiss]

it just shows how little our 4000 year old goat humpers knew about the world.
if they really knew that sperm cells are made daily in large quantity, how much is "shot" per ejaculation, you only need 1 to fertilize an egg, then they wouldn't complain about wasting sperm.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Hum? The topic has a bit wonky.
Ok some misconceptions, stone phallus were not sexual toys but items of worship (even tough it was likely used in that eventualy). Yes there were cults about large penises as simbols of verility and fertility, the problem is that this sort of items are not part of the context of the acient judeo-christian roots and in fact they were likely to be competitors as it is described in the bible that the cults of fertility were considered of the devil (when it suited them).

Masturbation is something you do in private, maybe it was of their view that if you feel unconfortable to do it in public then you shouldn't do it in private, never mind the inconsistencies of this philosophy. Let us not forget that the society of that culture was mainly patriarchal, only men were priest, only man wrote holly texts therefore it is not that unsurprising that you find a very male prespective of things. It forbids masturbation for man because it was common experience for man, "the spiling of the seed" thing may just have been an excuse, it doesn't mention masturbation for woman because female masturbation is not a common experience for man and maybe they didn't even knew that such a thing exist (because it is done in private). However a far more common experience for man of the female sexually related activity is the period because it makes for very messy sex and would very likely freak the fuck out of man at a time where very litle was known about phisiology.

 

[Andiferous]

Hum? The topic has a bit wonky.
Ok some misconceptions, stone phallus were not sexual toys but items of worship (even tough it was likely used in that eventualy). Yes there were cults about large penises as simbols of verility and fertility, the problem is that this sort of items are not part of the context of the acient judeo-christian roots and in fact they were likely to be competitors as it is described in the bible that the cults of fertility were considered of the devil (when it suited them).

Masturbation is something you do in private, maybe it was of their view that if you feel unconfortable to do it in public then you shouldn't do it in private, never mind the inconsistencies of this philosophy. Let us not forget that the society of that culture was mainly patriarchal, only men were priest, only man wrote holly texts therefore it is not that unsurprising that you find a very male prespective of things. It forbids masturbation for man because it was common experience for man, "the spiling of the seed" thing may just have been an excuse, it doesn't mention masturbation for woman because female masturbation is not a common experience for man and maybe they didn't even knew that such a thing exist (because it is done in private). However a far more common experience for man of the female sexually related activity is the period because it makes for very messy sex and would very likely freak the fuck out of man at a time where very litle was known about phisiology.

Thanks Ghosty.

I really like your points, I can agree on some level and am glad you voiced them seriously. As much as I would have liked to make some of your points, I guess I'm bad at stating them directly in discussions like this for fear of not being taken seriously. I sort of hoped for an objective discussion with insight like yours, but I guess most of us are too embarrassed to discuss it seriously, even if they like to argue.

If that is the case, I guess the trend speaks for itself., or can serve as an example of the issue itself.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Thanks Ghosty.

I really like your points, I can agree on some level and am glad you voiced them seriously. As much as I would have liked to make some of your points, I guess I'm bad at stating them directly in discussions like this for fear of not being taken seriously. I sort of hoped for an objective discussion with insight like yours, but I guess most of us are too embarrassed to discuss it seriously, even if they like to argue.

If that is the case, I guess the trend speaks for itself., or can serve as an example of the issue itself.

*shy's*

 

[Andiferous]

Heh, not at all. Chivalric.

This was hard for me too. It's interesting to see, although I suppose it might be an Andie original bizarre thread.

 

[Jotto999]

Either I cum in a controlled manner, or it'll eventually happen in my sleep. Either way, it's going to happen. I'd ask the rule maker why conscious is so much worse than while unconscious.

 

[Inferno]

I'd ask the rule maker why conscious is so much worse than while unconscious.

Imagine that I am on my bed, sleeping. Next to me is a contraption that needs exactly 80kg of weight to set off a cascade of events that will end up killing the person in the cage. If I roll onto it during my sleep, I wouldn't be convicted of murder (life) but instead "only" manslaughter(20 years). In other words, the difference is the intent.

 

[Jotto999]

I'd ask the rule maker why conscious is so much worse than while unconscious.

Imagine that I am on my bed, sleeping. Next to me is a contraption that needs exactly 80kg of weight to set off a cascade of events that will end up killing the person in the cage. If I roll onto it during my sleep, I wouldn't be convicted of murder (life) but instead "only" manslaughter(20 years). In other words, the difference is the intent.

Yes that is true, and I'll quit kidding now and say something more relevant.

In reality the sex drive is hardwired into us. The rule, I would argue, makes the assertion that you can simply decide to shut off or ignore your sex drive, which you physically cannot, making the law pointless. Any omniscient being would know it's a charade most would violate anyway.

In your analogy, the contraption needs to be not only inside of us and part of our psychological being, but set up to be likelier to go off and it's trigger ever more sensitive with each day that it does not go off.

 

[Vanlavak]

Masturbating is more fun than being at church.

Probably better for your health too.

Wanking > Christianity

Well then why not masturbate while at church?

 

[australopithecus]

Because you might risk attracting the clergy.