>< V >< said:Whether the universe is a Steady State or Big Bang is a scientific and experimental question. I have no doubt that if the Steady State solution prevailed, all you atheists would be hailing this monumental breakthrough that the universe had no beginning, thus no point of creation, thus no creator.
Funny how atheists always talk about how science has destroyed Gods. How science destroyed the moon God, the Sun God, the God of the planets. Funny how people thought the Sun was raised by the hand of God, yet science found that not to be true, that it was actually gravity.
Yet, when an instance arises where science didn't disprove God, ie the Big Bang, then all the sudden the power of science is too feeble to destroy Gods, to the atheist.
I find no credibility in such hypocrisy. Either science can destroy Gods or it can't. Make up your minds.
what we have here is what we call a "God of the gaps" argument.
A place where there is much unknown, that one can substitute their god for a yet to be given explenation.
the only reason why a steady-state was prefered by science over a creation myth, is the problem of infinite regression.
you probably heard of the phrase "who designed the designer?"
moons, planets and suns are just small fry compaired to the whole universe, so it would relatively easy to "debunk" them.
the only honest thing a person can say about "the beginning" of the universe is that it's an unknown.
it could be a god or gods has/have started the universe, but there is no evidence to support that claim.
if a person does claim he/she knows the how the universe started, he's (most likely) a liar and/or a fraud.
when i think of a liar, i think of WLC or Kent hovind
when thinking of frauds, i think of VFX or Nephilimfree