Andiferous
New Member
So when can I make it a theory then? Theory: Vinegar and baking soda produce CO2 bubbles.
-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
Unification of the 4 forces fundamental nature
- Thread starter V.E.ESPINOZA
- Start date
Luckily there's trolls and sock puppets about to keep everyone busy with one-line open questions.Andiferous said:Actually, the boards are a bit boring tonight. But I got you on that edit.
If you're bored, you might want to check out R, after initial frustration about the steeeeeeeeeep (yes, it's that steep) learning curve, it's actually quite cool to write scripts with it.
Theories are answers to "Why" questions. Why do vinegar and baking soda produce bubbles? Because...Andiferous said:
Andiferous
New Member
Actually, I do find this conversation enlightening. Heh.
But if things don't pick up, I will probably have to go do something useful. Maybe testing my hypothesis.
Did you just call me a sock puppet? I'm flattered.
Andiferous
New Member
Case said:
That's an excellent explanation, Mr. Case.
IF and THEN make a hypothesis (this sounds a bit like the philosophy guide thingy), and BECAUSE (therefore?) makes a theory (acceptable with sufficient evidence and reasonable conjecture). I like this.
I was at home/home (in contrast to away/home, which is where I live to study) the past three weeks, spent some time explaining scientific things to my family... and my explanations had to be precise, concise and easily understandable for them, considering they are unfamiliar with scientific vernacular. I guess that helped.
Andiferous
New Member
Sure. Upon closer inspection, a theory could also be considered the answer to a "How" question.
Some might take issue with me referring to the question "Why" as it may imply purpose.
Since I consider the "How" to precede a rather mechanical process description rather than an explanation (hence belonging to the hypothesis category),
I will make clear that no such implication of purpose is to be assumed.
Some might take issue with me referring to the question "Why" as it may imply purpose.
Since I consider the "How" to precede a rather mechanical process description rather than an explanation (hence belonging to the hypothesis category),
I will make clear that no such implication of purpose is to be assumed.
V.E.ESPINOZA
New Member
I am sending my research for the universities closer to physics professionals evaluate me my hypothesis, and create a true scientific theory.
ArthurWilborn
New Member
V.E.ESPINOZA said:
Ok; just promise us that if you get an answer from them that you'll accept what they say.
In the mean time, could you show us your research? By research I mean things like experiments with repeatable results.
australopithecus
Active Member
V.E.ESPINOZA said:
You don't have a hypothesis.
[Let alone anything that fits the scientific constraints required of a "theory" in any useful or meaningful way, in my opinion.]australopithecus said:
Am I the only one who thinks it's staggeringly ironic that this thread is in the "Pseudoscience" area of "General Scepticism"?
EDIT: Not surprising at all, actually, having had a cursory glance at his "theory". :facepalm:
V.E.ESPINOZA
New Member
The light has mass and weight...
http://www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
http://www.teoria-espinoza.es.tl
Very affectionate,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
June 10, 2011
ArthurWilborn
New Member
Ok, couple of things.
Light is affected by gravity, this is true. However, the reason the spotlights in your picture aren't hitting clouds is not because of gravity - if this were true you would see the beams bending in an arc like a thrown object. They just weren't powerful enough to get that far. Here's one that is:
I don't think you know what "redshifting" means based on what you are saying. Redshifting is when light from distant objects looks longer, or more "red", then it should. It happens no matter what the original color of the light was. There's also something called "blueshifting" where light looks shorter, or more "blue".
Could you reword this part, I don't understand:
"He observed in a microscope that glitters was an electric spark and so called photon produced by the Veegtron."
What were you looking at that glittered? How did it produce an electric spark? How do you know that a Veegtron was the cause?
Light is affected by gravity, this is true. However, the reason the spotlights in your picture aren't hitting clouds is not because of gravity - if this were true you would see the beams bending in an arc like a thrown object. They just weren't powerful enough to get that far. Here's one that is:
I don't think you know what "redshifting" means based on what you are saying. Redshifting is when light from distant objects looks longer, or more "red", then it should. It happens no matter what the original color of the light was. There's also something called "blueshifting" where light looks shorter, or more "blue".
Could you reword this part, I don't understand:
"He observed in a microscope that glitters was an electric spark and so called photon produced by the Veegtron."
What were you looking at that glittered? How did it produce an electric spark? How do you know that a Veegtron was the cause?
australopithecus
Active Member
:facepalm:
CommonEnlightenment
New Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect
*As always, check sources at bottom of articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect
*As always, check sources at bottom of articles
V.E.ESPINOZA
New Member
ArthurWilborn said:Ok, couple of things.
Light is affected by gravity, this is true. However, the reason the spotlights in your picture aren't hitting clouds is not because of gravity - if this were true you would see the beams bending in an arc like a thrown object. They just weren't powerful enough to get that far. Here's one that is:
I don't think you know what "redshifting" means based on what you are saying. Redshifting is when light from distant objects looks longer, or more "red", then it should. It happens no matter what the original color of the light was. There's also something called "blueshifting" where light looks shorter, or more "blue".
Could you reword this part, I don't understand:
"He observed in a microscope that glitters was an electric spark and so called photon produced by the Veegtron."
What were you looking at that glittered? How did it produce an electric spark? How do you know that a Veegtron was the cause?
Could you give me the link where you got the image please to see the reflector. This seems more like a meteorite.
When a bulb lights up a room, what is that glitters in the entire room? I say they are "Veegtrones or particle that moves the waves of mobile phones, television, radio and other". The photon is produced by the Veegtrà³n.
The light has weight.... http://www.theory-espinoza.es.tl or http://www.teoria-espinoza.es.tl
Very affectionate,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
June 10, 2011
Master_Ghost_Knight
New Member
Victor, how old are you?
Let me try to explain to this, you may be convinced that your ideas could genuinly be of scientific merit, but the matter of fact is your views about the world are so hoplessly wrong that I am quite convinced that you are very very young and you live in a sort of a fantasy world.
Light waves just like radio waves are almost unafected by gravity, to think that they can not go above the atmosphere is ludicrous because in fact it does, that and beyound. Had it not been the case this picture couldn't have been taken:
And the earth would look like a black hole because all the light would be traped. The sun is an oders of magnitude heavier and yet its light reachs to us without much resistance. We have established communication from earth as far as the edges of the solar system and there is no reason to believe that we just can't go on. And we have seen the light from galaxis so far away that by the time their light gets to us they may no longer exist.
When you trun on your light, the electrons in the metalic wire rush trough a particular material that when they get excited erradiate packets of energy in every direction that we call photons. The photons as they spread in every direction will "bounce" in the walls and objects of your room and depending of those objects are made the photons will "bounce" in diffrent manners in all diffrent directions. Some of the photons will "bounce" in such a way that it will come in the direction of your eyes which picks it up and it is able to tell where it has "bounced" by the way the photons arrive into your eye and you are able to see.
I have decribed to you in a laymans prespective what it is, but I haven't really told you anything usefull about it. To say that it is photons or leprechauns tells you nothing about how it works, why it works or how do you know that it is what I am claiming and not somthing else.
I could just as well have said MGKtrons done it that it is as equally useless, you will become as much as informed asif i didn't said nothig at all.
Let me try to explain to this, you may be convinced that your ideas could genuinly be of scientific merit, but the matter of fact is your views about the world are so hoplessly wrong that I am quite convinced that you are very very young and you live in a sort of a fantasy world.
Light waves just like radio waves are almost unafected by gravity, to think that they can not go above the atmosphere is ludicrous because in fact it does, that and beyound. Had it not been the case this picture couldn't have been taken:
And the earth would look like a black hole because all the light would be traped. The sun is an oders of magnitude heavier and yet its light reachs to us without much resistance. We have established communication from earth as far as the edges of the solar system and there is no reason to believe that we just can't go on. And we have seen the light from galaxis so far away that by the time their light gets to us they may no longer exist.
When you trun on your light, the electrons in the metalic wire rush trough a particular material that when they get excited erradiate packets of energy in every direction that we call photons. The photons as they spread in every direction will "bounce" in the walls and objects of your room and depending of those objects are made the photons will "bounce" in diffrent manners in all diffrent directions. Some of the photons will "bounce" in such a way that it will come in the direction of your eyes which picks it up and it is able to tell where it has "bounced" by the way the photons arrive into your eye and you are able to see.
I have decribed to you in a laymans prespective what it is, but I haven't really told you anything usefull about it. To say that it is photons or leprechauns tells you nothing about how it works, why it works or how do you know that it is what I am claiming and not somthing else.
I could just as well have said MGKtrons done it that it is as equally useless, you will become as much as informed asif i didn't said nothig at all.
)O( Hytegia )O(
New Member
*Facedesk*
All he's done is rediscover Science with genuine questions and calling them a different name. Unfortunately, it's already been well-on discovered and he's got a few things about them dead-wrong.
:lol:
All he's done is rediscover Science with genuine questions and calling them a different name. Unfortunately, it's already been well-on discovered and he's got a few things about them dead-wrong.
:lol:
V.E.ESPINOZA
New Member
The light has mass and weight...
http://www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
http://www.teoria-espinoza.es.tl
Very affectionate,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
June 10, 2011
)O( Hytegia )O(
New Member
V.E.ESPINOZA said:
*Visible Radiation on the Electromagnetic Spectrum has weight.*
:roll:
The higher-light frequencies COULD have less energy to maintain it's structure (which is why it's a lower frequency in the first place) and this results in the frequency "Dimming down." It could also be due to the fact that it cannot retain focus.
If light actually had weight, and it wasn't the result of "Dimming Down" then tell me why, when I shine a laser, does it not just bend over and land back on the ground?
Also, what is the mass of light?
I would like to see your studies determining which has more mass, that of the Ultraviolet, or that of the Infrared? What of radio waves - how much mass do they have? X Rays? Gamma Rays?
These are all part of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, here - I'm sure your studies have the mass of all of these included.