ImprobableJoe
New Member
Because it causes people who have no problem (in this case, men) to have to deal with the problem and therefore in their minds the rules cause the problem. Without the rules, they can go back to the comfortable status quo where other people's problems don't affect them.televator said:Edit: I do agree that it definitely does seem quite like a libertarian viewpoint. That it's the rules trying to stamp out the problem...that cause the problem. To me this really makes no sense. How could a rule aimed at a specific problem exist prior to the problem in order for the rule to cause the problem?