• League Of Reason Forums will shut down 10th September 2025.
    There is a thread regarding this in General Discussion.

This thread is about both evolution and politics, read description.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greg the Grouper

Active Member
I've never claimed to be doing a "theory of everything". My project tackles humanity, evolution, culture, society and politics.
Alright.
I do not know why "they" do not understand my opening.
If you climb back in the messages I responded a couple of times to Fuchsia Guy, but that still doesn't mean that I understand why he doesn't understand.
Putting it simply: different people are good at different things. Just today I got diagnosed with Asperger, so that may be one reason why some may understand my intro and others don't. I've clearly explained myself with well sectioned arguments in the intro. If one may not be able to understand where one argument cuts off and the other begins they can ask, but I take it as a given.
Okay, so why don't we take a closer look, and see what it is that they're not quite so good at?

They gave you information to work with in this regard. They told you what their difficulties were, they quoted sections of the intro and asked about its purpose; they shared their thoughts with you, did they not? Surely we can use that as a starting point to find out what went wrong.
 
These two statements, from the same paragraph aren't really compatible, are they.
Having an hypothesis doesn't mean that "you" know/understand the thing. No incompatibilities here.

I, in the end, still do not know why some may not understand my intro, I can just hypothesize.
 
Alright.

Okay, so why don't we take a closer look, and see what it is that they're not quite so good at?

They gave you information to work with in this regard. They told you what their difficulties were, they quoted sections of the intro and asked about its purpose; they shared their thoughts with you, did they not? Surely we can use that as a starting point to find out what went wrong.
I explained to Fuchsia Guy what they said that they did not understand ( https://leagueofreason.org.uk/index...ics-read-description.16746/page-3#post-195155 ) and tehy still thought that I made mistakes in my intro, while the one making mistakes was them.
In this case it just seemed that they were incapable of understanding the intro because of their shortcomings.

Other people may not understand the intro for any kind of reason. I, or someone else, can explain them, but if they keep on not understanding they can either accept that they can't or get angry, call the explainers names and staying on an horse so high that they need a space suit.
 
Anyways I didn't come here to discuss with people that either can't or won't understand what I am talking about, I came here for good criticism. I wish to no longer talk about why someone may not understand my intro because it's pretty self-evident both that my intro is well structured and that not one is good at everything.
Language misunderstandings and lack of references may be fixed with a simple response, but wasting time is not something that I'm willing to do.
 

*SD*

Administrator
Staff member
I explained to Fuchsia Guy what they said that they did not understand ( https://leagueofreason.org.uk/index...ics-read-description.16746/page-3#post-195155 ) and tehy still thought that I made mistakes in my intro, while the one making mistakes was them.
In this case it just seemed that they were incapable of understanding the intro because of their shortcomings.

Or, there's this other wild and wacky idea, which is that you haven't been clear and that's why they are confused. I know in your mind that's an impossibility, but to the rest of us it's an apparent reality.
 
Or, there's this other wild and wacky idea, which is that you haven't been clear and that's why they are confused. I know in your mind that's an impossibility, but to the rest of us it's an apparent reality.
I've already said that from someone's POV doesn't matter how well or simply you may explain something they may never be able to grasp it.

I do not want to sound elitist in any way, but saying that my intro is bad because one cannot understand it is like saying that planes cannot fly because one can't understand it.
 

Greg the Grouper

Active Member
I explained to Fuchsia Guy what they said that they did not understand ( https://leagueofreason.org.uk/index...ics-read-description.16746/page-3#post-195155 ) and tehy still thought that I made mistakes in my intro, while the one making mistakes was them.
In this case it just seemed that they were incapable of understanding the intro because of their shortcomings.

Other people may not understand the intro for any kind of reason. I, or someone else, can explain them, but if they keep on not understanding they can either accept that they can't or get angry, call the explainers names and staying on an horse so high that they need a space suit.
And the common theme of all his remarks (what does X part of this intro have to do with anything) isn't in any way indicative of his confusion concerning your intro? Why not?
 
He's referring to Sparhafoc. For some reason, he finds it necessary to refer to him by the colour the forum generates for the letter his name starts with, with respect to his avatar, rather than his actual screen name. Not sure why this is.
I've "ignored" them around... idk, yesterday?
Plus, I've difficulties with names. Either I call the name of a person or object many times almost every day or I've to train like a crazy man chanting to himself in a matted room.
I mean no insult here, because when I want to insult someone I don't result to such petty stuff, I do it hard and directly to their face. Insulting someone doesn't mean that you've to drop the respect too.
 
And the common theme of all his remarks (what does X part of this intro have to do with anything) isn't in any way indicative of his confusion concerning your intro? Why not?
1) Why do you talk about this in your intro? You're not explaining it. WHY? WHY DON'T YOU EXPLAIN EVERYTHING IN THE INTRO!?

2) I forgot to tell you in the last message that you're dragging around a quote from a random tread.
 

Greg the Grouper

Active Member
1) Why do you talk about this in your intro? You're not explaining it. WHY? WHY DON'T YOU EXPLAIN EVERYTHING IN THE INTRO!?
Well, why not? It is an introduction to your work, is it not? If your introduction to your work shouldn't introduce us to your work, then what should it do? If it ultimately isn't relevant to your work, then why even have it? Isn't it just taking up space and touching on subjects we're just going to drop once the introduction is over?
2) I forgot to tell you in the last message that you're dragging around a quote from a random tread.
I don't see it. I use my phone for this site, though.Does it say something about sushi?
 

*SD*

Administrator
Staff member
I don't see it. I use my phone for this site, though.Does it say something about sushi?

Yeah, I was wondering if it was intentional for some reason so I didn't ask about it previously. To delete it, just quote anything and you should be able to see it and remove it, you might have accidentally pushed it downscreen so you don't notice it when you're quoting other stuff.
 
D

Deleted member 619

Guest
I have this image of trying to get something off your face by direction, and it's highfuckinlarious.
 

*SD*

Administrator
Staff member
Yeah, mobile is weird on forumses, it's fine, it's removed from all your posts now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top