• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

THERE. IS. NO. GOD.

arg-fallbackName="AdmiralPeacock"/>
lrkun said:
ImprobableJoe said:
No, he's contrasting (NOT EQUATING) what the writers of the movie claimed was the cause of the monsters with what their claimed cause would actually produce.

And what did he choose? Kids with downsyndrome. That is what we got in the movie. He chose those pictures in as the result. As if that image is the result of the screw up.
You should really consider taking your own advice

I do.


So now you're psychic?
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
lrkun said:
ImprobableJoe said:
No, he's contrasting (NOT EQUATING) what the writers of the movie claimed was the cause of the monsters with what their claimed cause would actually produce.

And what did he choose? Kids with downsyndrome. That is what we got in the movie. He chose those pictures in as the result. As if that image is the result of the screw up.
What should he have shown an image of? The movie involved a disorder as a result of an extra chromosome. Off the top of your head, name a well-known condition involving an extra chromosome?

I dare say you can do it, XXY for example, but chromosome 21 duplication is by far the most common and recognizable.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
What should he have shown an image of? The movie involved a disorder as a result of an extra chromosome. Off the top of your head, name a well-known condition involving an extra chromosome?

I dare say you can do it, XXY for example, but chromosome 21 duplication is by far the most common and recognizable.

I would prefer he didn't use an image of any person who has a disorder. I would have prefered if he used a face palm, epic - fail, and others instead.
 
arg-fallbackName="AdmiralPeacock"/>
lrkun said:
AdmiralPeacock said:
So now you're psychic?

No.


Then why are you stubbornly insisting my intentions were to discriminate against the children with down's syndrome despite my clarification and that no less than two other people have managed to get?
 
arg-fallbackName="AdmiralPeacock"/>
lrkun said:
Anachronous Rex said:
What should he have shown an image of? The movie involved a disorder as a result of an extra chromosome. Off the top of your head, name a well-known condition involving an extra chromosome?

I dare say you can do it, XXY for example, but chromosome 21 duplication is by far the most common and recognizable.

I would prefer he didn't use an image of any person who has a disorder. I would have prefered if he used a face palm, epic - fail, and others instead.


So images of people with disorders offend you? How very discriminatory of you.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
AdmiralPeacock said:
So images of people with disorders offend you? How very discriminatory of you.

Don't you get it, it's your act that I am offended with, and not the picture itself.
 
arg-fallbackName="AdmiralPeacock"/>
lrkun said:
AdmiralPeacock said:
So images of people with disorders offend you? How very discriminatory of you.

Don't you get it, it's your act that I am offended with, and not the picture itself.


But you keep coming back to the picture - the act seems to be almost a side issue with you.

Besides, the act has been clarified to the satisfaction of every vocal party so far, except you.
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
lrkun said:
AdmiralPeacock said:
So images of people with disorders offend you? How very discriminatory of you.

Don't you get it, it's your act that I am offended with, and not the picture itself.
Don't you get it? It's a simple comparison. This is what people with extra chromosomes look like, not Demons/Aryan Ubermensch.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
AdmiralPeacock said:
But you keep coming back to the picture - the act seems to be almost a side issue with you.

Besides, the act has been clarified to the satisfaction of every vocal party so far, except you.

I keep coming back to the picture because it is important. It's what you chose. You contrasted your ideal scenario with something less ideal and what did it get you? That image.

I can't isolate the image from your actions. The two are connected. Anyway, I don't care anymore. As in this case, I don't agree with the majority.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
Don't you get it? It's a simple comparison. This is what people with extra chromosomes look like, not Demons/Aryan Ubermensch.

I do get it that it is a comparison between what his ideal scenario is and what he got; and that he thinks he got the lesser piece of the pie. I just find his choice offensive.

---

Anyway, I don't care anymore. Since all of you think it's okay ( I DON'T but hey, the majority thinks it's OK).
 
arg-fallbackName="AdmiralPeacock"/>
lrkun said:
Anyway, I don't care anymore. Since all of you think it's okay ( I DON'T but hey, the majority thinks it's OK).

funnyanimal303.gif
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
AdmiralPeacock said:
lrkun said:
Anyway, I don't care anymore. Since all of you think it's okay ( I DON'T but hey, the majority thinks it's OK).

funnyanimal139.gif

Because the majority does not agree with me, you imply that I should change forums?

motivatorad17ab2c20e1eedb30e278f5c5.jpg
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
AdmiralPeacock said:
Now you have to be simply trolling me... cause you can't be the much of an idiot.

:facepalm:

Ego much?

---

Anyway, back to the original topic of this thread.
FredisanEpicFail.jpg
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
AdmiralPeacock said:
Not at all, you failed on that last one bad.
1z6w2nl.gif

Stop stalking me.

Don't you see? I am ignoring you.

Talk about the topic of the thread please.

---

Fred the Movie's defense at least, John Cena was there.
 
Back
Top