The League of Reason censors Walter Remine

[YesYouNeedJesus]

The League of Reason locks threads that don't break any of their rules. They do so when they know the topic destroys their worldview. Proof here.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

I knew I shouldn't have said I invited Walter Remine to the site! I figured you would lock the thread and ban him from the site AFTER he made his argument, not before. What was i thinking!

 

[scalyblue]

Remine has made his argument known in a self-published book and an remedial, pitiful and shameful excuse for a 'paper,' and every one of his conclusions has been thoroughly and unquestionably refuted in every metric of his posit.

Let me rephrase this.

Remine is not just wrong, he is wrong at every conceivable scale of resolution. Zooming in on any part of his worldview finds beliefs exactly as wrong as his entire world view.


Let me reiterate via image.

Just in case you didn't understand that.

Let me just...clarify that.

No, really.
This arguing thing.
You're doing it wrong
W
R
O
N
G

The science thing?
You're not doing it at all!

Again...just in case you missed it..

 

[Anachronous Rex]

The League of Reason locks threads that don't break any of their rules. They do so when they know the topic destroys their worldview. Proof here.

You presented an argument. Rebuttals were presented. You failed to respond to these rebuttals and instead actively pursued infantile diversions. The thread was locked because you were trolling it.

Get over it.

 

[brettpalmer]

The League of Reason locks threads that don't break any of their rules. They do so when they know the topic destroys their worldview. Proof here.

You presented an argument. Rebuttals were presented. You failed to respond to these rebuttals and instead actively pursued infantile diversions. The thread was locked because you were trolling it.

Get over it.

And then he made an entirely new thread (this one) to troll some more!

Ee eye ee eye oh!

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

The League of Reason locks threads that don't break any of their rules. They do so when they know the topic destroys their worldview. Proof here.

I must ask, what color is the sky in your world?

The thread you link to was not locked because of you breaking any forum rules, but because you did not honor what you set out to prove.

You presented an argument. Rebuttals were presented. You failed to respond to these rebuttals and instead actively pursued infantile diversions. The thread was locked because you were trolling it.

Get over it.

Not only that, but you created this thread claiming, The League of reason censors Walter ReMine when this is clearly not the case. You claimed to have invited him onto this forum; so far, he has not shown up. Thus, how could this forum censor someone that is not here?

Furthermore, if the League of Reason truly censored, than why would this thread be allowed to stay up? Why would any of your posts be allowed to linger on this forum? I have been to two creationist sites that not only blocked me, but also removed all my comments and deleted my account. How is that for censorship?

Now if you want to discuss ReMine's paper, you are more than welcome to start a new thread devoted to discussing his paper. However, the thread that was locked was not the thread to do that in. That thread was for the presentation of a scientific paper for )O( Hytegia )O( to test. )O( Hytegia )O( even warned you that if you did not do that the thread was going to be locked.

)O( Hytegia )O([/url]"]No. This thread is a challenge of Peer-Review and testing. You started this thread for me to Peer Review and do the verifying tests on this paper as the acceptance of a challenge. I cancelled all of my plans this week aside from standing watch, and even my appointments at Medical to get my PHA done, so that I can play this game fair and square.

Once you were notified that this paper was a bunch of bullshit, you instead attempt to drive the conversation with nonsense and dance around it instead of having the common fucking decency to actually be honest for even a second and either say "Oh. Here's one-" or "No. I don't have any. My apologies."

Quit dancing and stick to the point - you either have something, or you don't.

If your next post isn't a paper that can be verified through testing that supports a single claim of a Young Earth Creation, I would request that the thread gets locked on account of intellectual dishonesty and failure to contribute of the agreement, with a note that YYNJ failed to produce a single document that provided evidence. And the next time he discusses evidence, he be redirected to that very ending post where he had all the chance to produce such evidence and failed to do so.

No posts by anyone else, either.

Emphasis mine.

Now please grow up and get over this martyr complex, unless you would like some more cheese with your whine.

 

[fightofthejellyfish]

The League of Reason censors Walter Remine

The thread is still there, anyone who wants a chuckle can still view it, it still contains your link to ReMine's 'paper', and you're still free to spout absurdly untrue statements such as this. No one was censored in any way, shape or form. All that happened was that a discussion was brought to a close because you couldn't deliver as promised, despite your embarrassing overconfidence that you could.

The challenge you accepted was to find any experiment, ever conducted, anywhere, that indicates the earth is around 6000 years old.

You failed. ReMine's paper outlines no such test, and indicates no such conclusion.


By all means keep looking. I'm certain that everyone here would be extremely interested if you find something.
However, I suspect that at some point you'll have to face the question:

Why don't creation 'scientists' ever do experiments?

 

[Frenger]

If I read correctly YYNJ, the thread was opened because Hytegia challenged you to present him with a testable creationsist hypothesis that he could then recreate. He offered to put in his own money and time to conduct the experiment and all you had to do was present him with a TESTABLE paper.

You didn't, you couldn't, you lied, the thread was closed.

Simples? I would have thought so.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Please fill out this form and submit it to the nearest trash can.

 

[brettpalmer]

...you created this thread claiming, The League of reason censors Walter ReMine when this is clearly not the case.

What do you expect? He's sat at the feet of his Master and has learned from the best. Just like claiming Michael Shermer actually stated, "The sun is not a light." Accuracy is not one of the apologists' virtues.

 

[australopithecus]

As Rex has pointed:

You presented an argument. Rebuttals were presented. You failed to respond to these rebuttals and instead actively pursued infantile diversions. The thread was locked because you were trolling it.

Get over it.

Now, you also posted the same Remine peice in the Aron/Bob debate thread, so if you can muster the energy to discuss it like an adult then I suggest you do so.

This thread is nothing more that butthurt writ public. Kindly grow up.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

Wow, you all are more foolish than I thought. Don't expect me to believe your lies. LoR censored Remine out of fear. Regardless, I guess I'll waste my time responding the asinine arguments in this thread.

Remine has made his argument known in a self-published book and an remedial, pitiful and shameful excuse for a 'paper,' and every one of his conclusions has been thoroughly and unquestionably refuted in every metric of his posit.

Let me rephrase this.

Remine is not just wrong, he is wrong at every conceivable scale of resolution. Zooming in on any part of his worldview finds beliefs exactly as wrong as his entire world view.

Being wrong is not justification for locking a thread. If he was simply wrong, the thread would not have been locked. LoR did it out of fear of where the discussion was headed.

You presented an argument. Rebuttals were presented. You failed to respond to these rebuttals and instead actively pursued infantile diversions. The thread was locked because you were trolling it.

Get over it.

What thread were you reading? Define trolling and show me where I'm guilty. You guys don't know what soft tissue is and neither do you know what trolling is. Everything I said was completely on topic, especially considering the fact that the topic was Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine. Think, McFly! Think!

And then he made an entirely new thread (this one) to troll some more!

See response to Rex above.

I must ask, what color is the sky in your world?
The thread you link to was not locked because of you breaking any forum rules, but because you did not honor what you set out to prove.

If that's the requirement for locking a thread, why hasn't AronRa's debate been locked? That's because you guys just make it up as you go. Do all threads get locked when someone does not prove what they set out to prove? Nope. More evidence it was done out of fear. Further, I did exactly what I set out to prove and apparently no one has the intelligence to see that.

Not only that, but you created this thread claiming, The League of reason censors Walter ReMine when this is clearly not the case. You claimed to have invited him onto this forum; so far, he has not shown up. Thus, how could this forum censor someone that is not here?

That was a figure of speech. "Walter Remine" referred to his paper and arguments.

Furthermore, if the League of Reason truly censored, than why would this thread be allowed to stay up? Why would any of your posts be allowed to linger on this forum? I have been to two creationist sites that not only blocked me, but also removed all my comments and deleted my account. How is that for censorship?

Then those creationist sites are just as bad and fearful as LoR.

Now if you want to discuss ReMine's paper, you are more than welcome to start a new thread devoted to discussing his paper. However, the thread that was locked was not the thread to do that in. That thread was for the presentation of a scientific paper for )O( Hytegia )O( to test. )O( Hytegia )O( even warned you that if you did not do that the thread was going to be locked.

I presented a scientific paper published in a scientific journal peer-reviewed by scientists!

Emphasis mine.

Now please grow up and get over this martyr complex, unless you would like some more cheese with your whine.

I'm curious, does anyone here have eyes? Go back to the locked thread and look at my post immediately after Hytegia's threat. Did I do what he asked? Yes or No?

The thread is still there, anyone who wants a chuckle can still view it, it still contains your link to ReMine's 'paper', and you're still free to spout absurdly untrue statements such as this. No one was censored in any way, shape or form. All that happened was that a discussion was brought to a close because you couldn't deliver as promised, despite your embarrassing overconfidence that you could.

What did I promise to deliver? (Hint: I delivered exactly what I promised to deliver, threefold.)

The challenge you accepted was to find any experiment, ever conducted, anywhere, that indicates the earth is around 6000 years old.

FAIL. That wasn't the challenge. Read again.

If I read correctly YYNJ, the thread was opened because Hytegia challenged you to present him with a testable creationsist hypothesis that he could then recreate. He offered to put in his own money and time to conduct the experiment and all you had to do was present him with a TESTABLE paper.

You didn't, you couldn't, you lied, the thread was closed.

Simples? I would have thought so.

You guys don't think mathematics is testable? ROFL :lol: I'm pretty sure I posted in the section of the website called "Science and Mathematics."

This thread is nothing more that butthurt writ public. Kindly grow up.

Locking threads is about the most infantile thing one can do. I'm guessing that's just par for the course for LoR. That's why AronRa insisted on having the debate here. It was his trump card. What exactly were my diversions?

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

If you guys can't understand a simple challenge and my simple answer to the challenge, then I guess you'll never be able to understand science. Not much I can do about that.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[4]

You were asked repeatedly by Hytegia to provide some testable creationist material, the thread was created with that point in mind, and repeatedly you failed to produce; thereby disrupting on-topic discussion.

If you would like to create a thread dealing only with Walter Remine and his ideas, by all means do so. As should be obvious by all of the rebuttals for which you had no reply, no one here is frightened of this man.

Kindly stop bitching, it's getting very tiresome.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

You were asked repeatedly by Hytegia to provide some testable creationist material

I did. In case you didn't know, mathematics is testable.

the thread was created with that point in mind

I know, I created the thread.

and repeatedly you failed to produce

Failed to produce what? I produced Remine's paper, which was perfectly acceptable. I talked about Dr. Humphrey's Neptune and Uranus paper. And I produced Dr. Humphrey's Earth paper as I promised I would do. Do you enjoy lying?

thereby disrupting on-topic discussion.

The topic title was "Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine." The only thing off topic was telling Hytegia I would get him another paper, which I did.

If you would like to create a thread dealing only with Walter Remine and his ideas, by all means do so.

I already did you and you locked it for no reason whatsoever, which leads me to believe it was done by fear. And your blatant lies just add fuel to that fire.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

Oh, and don't think we don't know what you're doing, because we've seen this act before.

The creationist shows up and then goofs-off until the mods are forced to take action, and then they cry foul about how oppressed they are, how we're all afraid of the truth, and other such nonsense. It's a great way to claim victory without actually having to actually back up your claims with evidence or defend them against rebuttal (which, just so we're clear, you didn't do), but sadly no one but other young-earth creationists ever falls for it.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

You were asked repeatedly by Hytegia to provide some testable creationist material

I did. In case you didn't know, mathematics is testable.

You know, I was thinking you were just dishonest, but now I think that you might simply not understand what Hytegia said. He asked for an experiment that he could run. Did you not notice that part? Do you not know what an experiment is? What's the problem here?

and repeatedly you failed to produce

Failed to produce what? I produced Remine's paper, which was perfectly acceptable. I talked about Dr. Humphrey's Neptune and Uranus paper. And I produced Dr. Humphrey's Earth paper as I promised I would do. Do you enjoy lying?

An experiment that Hytegia could run, something that he could try to replicate the results thereof; you know, what he asked for. Don't accuse other people of lying until you learn to understand what they are saying.

thereby disrupting on-topic discussion.

The topic title was "Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine." The only thing off topic was telling Hytegia I would get him another paper, which I did.

Did it have an experiment in it? Do you know what that word means? What is your level of education in science?

If you would like to create a thread dealing only with Walter Remine and his ideas, by all means do so.

I already did you and you locked it for no reason whatsoever, which leads me to believe it was done by fear. And your blatant lies just add fuel to that fire.

Buddy, I'm about as afraid of you and Walter Remine as I am that Batman will swoop out of the sky and steal my kidneys. Now we've given you the reason several times. Your inability to acknowledge it does not change this.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

You know, I was thinking you were just dishonest, but now I think that you might simply not understand what Hytegia said. He asked for an experiment that he could run. Did you not notice that part? Do you not know what an experiment is? What's the problem here?

I never saw the word "run." Maybe you could show me where he used that word. In case you didn't notice, I explained why I chose Remine's paper. I was being thoughtful of Hytegia. And as soon as he protested, I came through with a new paper as promised. You need to admit you were wrong to lock the thread.

An experiment that Hytegia could run, something that he could try to replicate the results thereof; you know, what he asked for. Don't accuse other people of lying until you learn to understand what they are saying.

Again, I did produce a paper he could run. Did you not read the thread?

Did it have an experiment in it? Do you know what that word means? What is your level of education in science?

Again, if you would have read the thread you locked, you would know the answers to your questions.

Buddy, I'm about as afraid of you and Walter Remine as I am that Batman will swoop out of the sky and steal my kidneys. Now we've given you the reason several times. Your inability to acknowledge it does not change this.

And your inability to acknowledge that you had no reasonable reason to lock the thread does not change that fact either.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

Challenge to Anachronous Rex

When Hytegia said,

If your next post isn't a paper that can be verified through testing that supports a single claim of a Young Earth Creation, I would request that the thread gets locked.

What was the next post????

 

[scalyblue]

Challenge to Anachronous Rex

When Hytegia said,

If your next post isn't a paper that can be verified through testing that supports a single claim of a Young Earth Creation, I would request that the thread gets locked.

What was the next post????

A link to another thread on the forum?

duh.