• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Priority Shift

arg-fallbackName="borrofburi"/>
Squawk said:
Which side is asking you, constantly, to be open minded, to follow the evidence, and to draw conclusions based on that evidence, without bias?
Eh. I don't think it's quite that stark. Oh certainly I agree that neph is a bit... But I am certain there are christians in his life (even creationists) who will encourage him to be open minded and follow the evidence (if for no other reason than that I found one on the comments of one of the videos).
 
arg-fallbackName=")O( Hytegia )O("/>
australopithecus said:
This.

If Neph and Shock has critically and objectively looked at the evidence and decided they were unconvinced then (despite my confusion) I'd have to accept that. They didn't. They decided they were right and went about confirming their own bias. The fact that Puppy has admitted he doesn't know means he is already years ahead of them in maturity.

I was years ahead of them in maturity when I was in the "MINE!" stage of life.
 
arg-fallbackName="Squawk"/>
borrofburi said:
Eh. I don't think it's quite that stark. Oh certainly I agree that neph is a bit... But I am certain there are christians in his life (even creationists) who will encourage him to be open minded and follow the evidence (if for no other reason than that I found one on the comments of one of the videos).

I doubt you'll find too many who will actively do so, however, when it comes to their belief in a deity. On all other subjects, yes, hence the many scientist christians. But I'd contend they have to compartmentalise.
 
Back
Top