Dogma's Demise
New Member
Okay so I wanted to say a word or two about this Islamic community center Park51, built very close to Ground Zero (where WTC fell). I know it's a bit of an old issue now, but I never really got the chance to talk about it.
Now, this may come as a shock to a few of you, but I think they had a right to build it. After all, they bought the land, they brought in the money, federal funding was denied as it should be it in any secular world: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/no-federal-funds-for-islamic-community-center-says-group-60675.html
When I say "they had a right" I don't mean however that I think this idea is worthy of any kind of respect. I think it's a tasteless and provocative gesture, an insult to the victims of 9/11 to construct anything "Islamic" (community center, mosque, both etc.) in close proximity to Ground Zero. (Keep in mind, even though it's not ON Ground Zero, it's still on a place where debris fell.)
(Did I mention it was initially called "Cordoba House" - Hmmm a reference to Islamic conquest of Cordoba? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%B3rdoba,_Andalusia#History )
It would be akin to, well let's say a pack of street dogs attack and kill some children (and this wouldn't be hypothetical at all, my country Romania has a very serious street dog infestation). And then a few years laterThe Romanian Misanthropic Association Vier Pfoten or some other animal welfare nazi NGO decided to build a center for promotion of dog welfare specifically on that same street on in relatively close proximity where the children were killed. Let's say they also applied for state funding (yes, taking money from everyone, including the victims' families to support their bullshit plans).
Yes, now that would be very tasteless as well. It never happened, but then again I wouldn't be surprised given the idiocy frequently displayed by these animal welfare activists: lies, propaganda, victim-blaming, fueling the problem etc. (Some of you westerners may have seen the negative coverage my country gets on this issue, when all people here want are clean streets without dogs running free and biting people.)
Or another example: WBC funeral protests. Completely inappropriate, provocative, degrading, fucking retarded, you name it.
(And to clarify in advance, I'm not against animal welfare - within reason - I'm just tired of this bullshit that it's somehow "immoral" to put a dog to sleep, even when painless, humane methods are used.)
Now, this may come as a shock to a few of you, but I think they had a right to build it. After all, they bought the land, they brought in the money, federal funding was denied as it should be it in any secular world: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/no-federal-funds-for-islamic-community-center-says-group-60675.html
When I say "they had a right" I don't mean however that I think this idea is worthy of any kind of respect. I think it's a tasteless and provocative gesture, an insult to the victims of 9/11 to construct anything "Islamic" (community center, mosque, both etc.) in close proximity to Ground Zero. (Keep in mind, even though it's not ON Ground Zero, it's still on a place where debris fell.)
(Did I mention it was initially called "Cordoba House" - Hmmm a reference to Islamic conquest of Cordoba? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%B3rdoba,_Andalusia#History )
It would be akin to, well let's say a pack of street dogs attack and kill some children (and this wouldn't be hypothetical at all, my country Romania has a very serious street dog infestation). And then a few years later
Yes, now that would be very tasteless as well. It never happened, but then again I wouldn't be surprised given the idiocy frequently displayed by these animal welfare activists: lies, propaganda, victim-blaming, fueling the problem etc. (Some of you westerners may have seen the negative coverage my country gets on this issue, when all people here want are clean streets without dogs running free and biting people.)
Or another example: WBC funeral protests. Completely inappropriate, provocative, degrading, fucking retarded, you name it.
(And to clarify in advance, I'm not against animal welfare - within reason - I'm just tired of this bullshit that it's somehow "immoral" to put a dog to sleep, even when painless, humane methods are used.)