My ignorance of time travel.

[saenbateman]

"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off

Time travel violates the laws of physics I taught that was a given, only not the ones you are picking with.

 

[Ozymandyus]

"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off

Um what? No it's not assumed: we know Exactly what happened originally, and nothing has changed from those original circumstances. You have taken block B back in time to witness those events again, but the original block B and Block A from that time has not been tampered with, rather Block B from some future point has been tampered with.

Time travel already contradicts the laws of physics.

It goes off? Did you trail off because you realized you have no idea what you are talking about?