• League Of Reason Forums will shut down 10th September 2025.
    There is a thread regarding this in General Discussion.

My ignorance of time travel.

saenbateman

New Member
"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off
 

Master_Ghost_Knight

Active Member
saenbateman said:
"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off

Time travel violates the laws of physics I taught that was a given, only not the ones you are picking with.
 
saenbateman said:
"block A should travel the exact same path that it did originally. There should now be two copies of Block B at the time of the original collision,"
This doesn't just contradict laws of physics but is all assumed, it goes off
Um what? No it's not assumed: we know Exactly what happened originally, and nothing has changed from those original circumstances. You have taken block B back in time to witness those events again, but the original block B and Block A from that time has not been tampered with, rather Block B from some future point has been tampered with.

Time travel already contradicts the laws of physics.

It goes off? Did you trail off because you realized you have no idea what you are talking about?
 
Top