• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Is evolution a fact?

arg-fallbackName="Rhed"/>
hackenslash said:
Rhed said:
It's written in your DNA. :mrgreen:

If that's what passes for evidence in Rhedworld, no wonder you're crap at comedy.

Seriously, if you think that's funny, you're more of an idiot than I thought, which I suppose is an achievement, of sorts.

Thank you for your kind words. I see you are improving as well.
 
arg-fallbackName="Rhed"/>
hackenslash said:
Rhed said:
How many more do you have left? ;)

Enough to know your conclusions are extracted directly from an orifice most readily associated with a more solid form of waste.

Again, thanks. You appear to be a good-natured human being.
 
arg-fallbackName="Collecemall"/>
Rhed said:
Collecemall said:
I know what sin is. It's the tool that religion uses to take normal sane people and break them so that they can then offer them the "cure". The sad part is it's primarily aimed at children who then spend the rest of their lives thinking they are flawed. In a sane world this would be considered abuse. Sin is evil and not in the way you want to portray it.

I understand. We are all flawed. When someone judges me, they try to take the sawdust out of my eye while they have a log in theirs.

I'm not flawed. That's the problem. If you can't find something broken you'll break it just so you can serve up your "cure". That's a terrible state to be in having to pawn your own misery out to other people. I'm sorry someone managed to manipulate you into thinking you have something wrong with you. That disease is one I won't catch. I found an inoculation for it thank goodness.
 
arg-fallbackName="Rhed"/>
hackenslash said:
Bingo!

Sin is predicated on the existence of a magical entity. You might as well threaten us with not getting any presents from Santa.

But I don't believe in Santa. Atheists who conform to evolutionary thought would see a possibility of a Santa with his flying reindeer.
 
arg-fallbackName="Rhed"/>
Collecemall said:
I'm not flawed. That's the problem. If you can't find something broken you'll break it just so you can serve up your "cure". That's a terrible state to be in having to pawn your own misery out to other people. I'm sorry someone managed to manipulate you into thinking you have something wrong with you. That disease is one I won't catch. I found an inoculation for it thank goodness.


Sorry, but I have not the slightest idea of what you just said. Cheers to you though, you are not flawed.
 
arg-fallbackName="Rhed"/>
DutchLiam84 said:
Rhed said:
I know there is a God. It's the most logical and rational explanation about everything. And you are sort-of-right. When I believed in evolution (like you), and an atheist (like you) I thought I did moral things. Now since I've opened my eyes and did some critical thinking on my own, I now know God and the Truth. Since then, I see myself as the worst sinner. You won't understand this because of your atheistic worldview. It makes you laugh when I say such things because I was there and know what it is like.
Magic, the most logical and rational explanation about everything. You heard it here first folks. I mean holy shit, all this research that I do that takes me years. I could've just said GOD!
Why are bananas curved? GOD! Why does poop smell bad? GOD! Why is there so much pain and suffering in the world? GOD! Why does it hurt when I pee? GOD! How does my car work? GOD! Why is my bookshelf concave? GOD! I just farted....why? GOD! Why did Germany win the world cup? GOD! Why wrong is sentence order? GOD! Why did I just type this word? GOD! Blue balls? GOD! Hole in one? GOD! AIDS? GOD! Child pornography? GOD! ISIS? GOD! Psychopaths? GOD! Salt water? GOD! Guns? GOD! I think you catch my drift. Fuck, your life must be easy! The answer to every goddamn question ever: GOD!!!!!!!!!

The things you did then you don't consider to be moral anymore? Can I ask what kind of things you thought were moral but now you think aren't?

Well said! That was pure poetry. That would make a terrific Christian song, but without the bad language of course. And all of that research, just say "it evolved".

Verse 2:

Why are bananas curved? It evolved! Why does poop smell bad? Evolution! Why pain and suffering? EVOLUTION SILLY! Why does it hurt when I pee? STOP COMPLAINING, YOU MAY BE EVOLVING! How does my brain work? IT EVOLVED!
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 619"/>
Rhed said:
But I don't believe in Santa.

In the same way that I don't believe in your cosmic arse-bandit.
Atheists who conform to evolutionary thought would see a possibility of a Santa with his flying reindeer.

Not if they had any clue about physics, they wouldn't.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 619"/>
Rhed said:
without the bad language of course.

It thinks language can be 'bad'!

We might be dealing with a scale of fuckwittery we have no means to measure here, ladles and jellyspoons,.
 
arg-fallbackName="Mr_Wilford"/>
I see this thread has basically degraded into a schlong measuring competition

Ah well. There will be others.
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
Rhed said:
he_who_is_nobody said:
Citation needed.

It's written in your DNA. :mrgreen:

"DNA is a code in precisely the same way that London is a map." - hackenslash. Ponder that for a minute or two, than get back to me. Beyond that, until you can show evidence for a god, you cannot claim it has an effect on anything in the first place. You are putting the cart before the house with this response.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 619"/>
I always put the cart before the house. Apart from anything else, if the house burns down, I can get away in the cart. :mrgreen:

Note to Rhed: This is how comedy is done.
 
arg-fallbackName="SpecialFrog"/>
Bernhard.visscher said:
There has been a 1000 plus comments on evidence...it's not working.
It's working fine. After spending several pages complaining that no one was providing evidence, I provided evidence that you were forced to acknowledge demonstrated that known genetic processes could increase genetic information.

After that suddenly you want to avoid all discussions of evidence. Why is that?
Bernhard.visscher said:
Based on the one you gave me you have no choice but to leave evolution.
Since evolution only applies to populations I don't see how I can leave or not leave evolution. If you think you have somehow logically cornered me you are even more self-deluded that I had previously suspected.

Anyway, I promised more Humpty Dumpty if you blathered on further about my alleged presuppositions without stating what you think they are so here goes:

hmpty.gif
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
hackenslash said:
I always put the cart before the house. Apart from anything else, if the house burns down, I can get away in the cart. :mrgreen:

Note to Rhed: This is how comedy is done.

:oops:

Normally, I would blame this on my dySlEXiA, but I think I will place that mistake on using an iPod Touch to respond. Autocorrect is not always my friend.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 619"/>
No, but it's often mine. :lol:
 
arg-fallbackName="tuxbox"/>
he_who_is_nobody said:
:oops:

Normally, I would blame this on my dySlEXiA, but I think I will place that mistake on using an iPod Touch to respond. Autocorrect is not always my friend.


hackenslash said:
No, but it's often mine. :lol:


lmao
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 619"/>
Bernhard.visscher said:
See here is the problem evolutionists face when asked of the presuppositions of evolution

1) they don't know them.. Therefore ignorant
2) they claim to not know them, while knowing... Dishonest

Several things wrong here. Firstly, you present a false dichotomy. There might be no presuppositions 8f evolution. Moreover, since you only assert them to exist, and refuse to detail what they are, this amounts to nothing more than us watching you stand there with your cock in your hand.
So either dishonesty or ignorance: the basis of evolution.

And now you're contradicting yourself. You said that the basis of evolution was presuppositions, which means that not only is this a contradiction, it's also a false dichotomy, because you yourself have presented a third option.
Therefore evolution is false

Except for that inconvenient bit about it having been observed occurring, you mean?

[quoteThe science doesn't even have to be addressed it can be philosophically destroyed. [/quote]

The only thing that's been destroyed here is the delusion that you're not a fuckwit.
Therefore evolution cannot be a fact.

Therefore schmerefore. Eevolution is still an observed phenomenon, and you're still a fuckwit.
 
arg-fallbackName="JRChadwick"/>
Bernhard.visscher said:
See here is the problem evolutionists face when asked of the presuppositions of evolution

1) they don't know them.. Therefore ignorant
2) they claim to not know them, while knowing... Dishonest


So either dishonesty or ignorance: the basis of evolution.

Therefore evolution is false

The science doesn't even have to be addressed it can be philosophically destroyed.

Therefore evolution cannot be a fact.
Or... there are no presuppositions and you are an idiot. If you actual named what you think they are, we could debunk them.
Bernhard.visscher said:
Therefore concluding it is only possible for me to do one thing.

Reveal the presuppositions of evolution.
You have you yet to reveal anything but your own foolishness.
Bernhard.visscher said:
Prove they are assumptions, therefore not science

Those who have ears will hear.

God bless all those who participated. I now know, when I meet an evolutionist the option I have that will be in my opinion, the best mode of attack.

Evolution, like atheism, is based on ignorance.

The fundamental building block of all illusions and false faiths.
Most of what you say makes no sense at all. The rest is bullshit.
 
Back
Top