Dragan Glas
Well-Known Member
Greetings,
ET is a more complicated explanation.
"God(s)" is the most complicated explanation.
This is a case of simple logic in deciding which is the simplest explanation consistent with the evidence - and that is evolution.
If you can show a better explanation and provide evidence for it, go ahead.
Kindest regards,
James
Evolution is the simplest explanation for the observed data.Bernhard.visscher said:Attacking creation, and et at the end of your statement does not strengthen your argument it in fact highlights your ignorance. Because what you are saying is first you know it's evolution... Then you turn around and say prove to me it's not evolution.
But this thread is about proving evolution... Not proving creationism or et. So focus.. Eyes on the ball... Evidence for the basilosaurus... Try again?
ET is a more complicated explanation.
"God(s)" is the most complicated explanation.
This is a case of simple logic in deciding which is the simplest explanation consistent with the evidence - and that is evolution.
If you can show a better explanation and provide evidence for it, go ahead.
Kindest regards,
James