Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.

[Sparhafoc]

@Sparhafoc Maybe we just do not get it, because he is not able to express himself properly in a foreign language?

I understand the majority of his garbled ranting - I say when I don't.


Please don't be fooled DL - you're not dealing with a normal guy who's struggling to phrase a serious ideas - this guy's basically an obsessive sociopath.

Copy and past the first line of his original post into Google and see what you get!

 

[Sparhafoc]

On an international bee-keeping forum!

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life -

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life -

beemaster.com

On a Dell PC forum

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc. | DELL Technologies

___________________________***********Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ...

www.dell.com

On a family rights forum

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, - Family Rights Group | Parents’ Forum

www.frg.org.uk

On a forum for cattle enthusiasts

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ?? that what- what you have thought and done on every single second ) can you tell me every single detail of your `1 cheapest Minute Or...

www.steerplanet.com

This loon tours the internet splurging this copy & paste crap everywhere. It's not a deficiency of English grammar that induces him to do so, it's manic obsessive delusion.

 

[Led Zeppelin]

On an international bee-keeping forum!

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life -

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life -

beemaster.com

On a Dell PC forum

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc. | DELL Technologies

___________________________***********Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ...

www.dell.com

On a family rights forum

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, - Family Rights Group | Parents’ Forum

www.frg.org.uk

On a forum for cattle enthusiasts

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ?? that what- what you have thought and done on every single second ) can you tell me every single detail of your `1 cheapest Minute Or...

www.steerplanet.com

This loon tours the internet splurging this copy & paste crap everywhere. It's not a deficiency of English grammar that induces him to do so, it's manic obsessive delusion.

My god. Looks like Sparhafoc is right..

 

[*SD*]

Also on the rebelliousgrasshopperandsometimesnaughtyantswhilstoccasionallymiscehviouslemontrees forum...

 

[Sparhafoc]

My god. Looks like Sparhafoc is right..

He's been doing it for a decade, across dozens, maybe hundreds of fora.

I've 'met' him multiple times on other forum over the years, one where he still pops up once a year as a new sock puppet to copy & paste the same text yet again. He's a running joke there - in the zoo of internet crazies who have no capacity for self-restraint.

 

[Dragan Glas]

Greetings,

what you will deal with later ?? huh? i just want damn scientific explanation just demontrate your hypothesis. how one species turned into another, did you not watched your videos on evolution ? how man transforms from monkeys ? yet monkeys are there as well as demonstrate that how this off-shot takes place.

Yes, because monkeys gave rise to apes, which includes humans.

Monkeys still exist because their environment (forests) still exist.

but fun is you cannot demonstrate anything. thanks for making show of having knowledge yet its fun to see how confident you are, maybe its due to having enough money, enough food, enough land, enough of everything but fun is existence of father is denied ( what an joke is it )

you are just an troll. its clear to me now ( pseudo scientific man ) and people like you just can observe anything and speak anything nonsense things. but fun is you cannot demonstrate your hypothesis, how one room or species turns into another species or room ? where person who walks from one room to another ( aka soul ) would go than ?

amazing it is to see that you are satisfied still, rightly your fellow quoted darwin that fools feels more confident in ignorance than having knowledge. ( very well said ) perfectly fits on you.

You have already said that you won't view any videos I provide, so how can I prove evolution merely be explaining it to you in words? It would take pages and pages of text to do so.

Fossils are like time-stamped photographs. We know when they occurred, and the order in which they occurred. We can see how skeletons have changed over millions of years resulting in species giving rise to other species.

Whether one is looking at the evolution of whales, or Tiktaalik (a transitional species between fish and amphibians), or the finches on the Galapagos (image) that Darwin studied - they, and others, show how species evolve.

_________________________
we are just talking about father, not mother. because no one is dropped from the sky either. they are coming out of womb of there mothers and people has seen us when we came out of certain mothers wombs. so dont bring mothers. its question of only biological fathers.

now you or me or we all here are no longer new borns, so why dont you tell me now that how did we recognized our real father even ? whom we havent seen before our births ? how ? and neither you nor i are that unfortuante that we are adopted. so just bring us process of recognizing of our real fathers generally. because general population is not that unfortunate that we all are adopted. do you understand that ?

if you dont believe your real mother than why do you believe your darwin also ? because you have no proof or any scientific explanation for your evolution as well. but still beleive some whores that there is no father but evolution ? why is that than ?

Evidence - that's what counts.

We can be told all sorts of things. that doesn't make them true. We may accept things for the time being but we need evidence to be certain.

You may believe a particular woman is your mother - but you don't know for certain until you have a DNA test done.

As I explained earlier, mosaicism and/or chimerism can result in someone having more than one genome. It can even result in children having different DNA than the mother due to her eggs having come from different genomes. At first glance it would seem that the DNA test has failed but further investigation of the mother's genome(s) would prove that she's their mother.

_____________________________
i do have idea how dna works that is why i have brought entire hand or legs transplant. and what is dna ? any president ? no its not its an slave of blood groups, hairs, bone marrow, skin tone, skin color, etc things and be found in all these things like anything.

doctors transplant entire hand or legs after matching all these things like gross material like skin color, skin tone, hand or legs size upto genders and subtle as well like bone marrow, tissues, blood groups etc matches. so you make proper research about it and know what is entire hand or legs transplanting.

because this transplanting of entire hand or legs has killed your pseudo dna test fallacy. and nothing is reliable unless you prove how it is reliable, you have to prove yourself how it is reliable, after being shattered by this contradiction of entire hand or legs transplant.

Transplants don't disprove DNA tests.

Although cells from transplants may remain for some time, that doesn't prevent DNA tests from working. No-one takes DNA from transplants in criminal cases.

____________________
those who are charged as criminals with this dna test ( with bare guess work ) than they are doomed because it is matching with many others. and how it is relaible you have to bring greater knowledge than i have brought and prove it. now because you said something in favor of someone wont make me believe it. becaue you are someone who is not able to demonstrate your hypothesis that how evolution is working. yet you are claiming to be right in the first place. amazing type of farce it is.

I have brought greater knowledge because I'm providing actual evidence for what I'm saying through links, all you're doing is proselytising your beliefs that Krishna exists, that your guru is his one true representative, and that the soul exists.

You've already admitted that you don't have any evidence for Krishna, so what's the point in claiming anything based on him?

Kindest regards,

James

 

[Deleted member 42253]

Okey, fucking around in a bee keeping forum definitely is going to far.
He is on my shitlist too now.

Gotta respect the tenacity though.

 

[Deleted member 619]

The question 'why are there still monkeys' is, to my mind, the dumbest question in the creationist pantheon.

Rather than posing any problem for evolutionary theory, it rightly indicates that some questions are so silly that they can only arise from an ignorance of that which they attempt to pose some sort of gotcha for.

The problem is that it indicates a horrible misunderstanding of just what evolutionary theory postulates.

Speciation doesn't come in a single flavour. In particular, there are broadly three modes of speciation. The first of these occurs when a single population diverges into multiple populations, often because of some environmental barrier becoming manifest.

For example, you could have something as simple as, say, a peninsula becoming an island due to changes in sea level, and then the peninsula being partially covered so that it looks more like an archipelago. Given sufficient reduction in gene flow, the populations can manifest some quite different mutations. Once gene flow is completely cut off by such separation, speciation occurs. This is sympatric speciation.

The second mode is when populations diverge genetically from their ancestors, to the degree that, were you to bring members of the child population and the ancestor population together, they would not be interfertile. This is allopatric speciation.

The third is quite rare, but it occurs when a single population diverges while not subject to any environmental barriers. Generally, their ranges will be adjacent, and models predict that there will often be hybrids at the boundaries. This is parapatric speciation, and it's the basis for ring species.

The problem with the question as posed is simply that it resides entirely on the assumption that all speciation is allopatric, which is not a prediction of evolutionary theory.

We should also note for completeness that the question is also incoherent for another reason. It asks why the existence of a subset doesn't pose a problem for the set. This is most easily rebutted by asking, "If ducks evolved from birds, why are there still birds?" or "If Americans came from Europe, why are there still Europeans?"

It's a silly question.

And that, Anning, is what the full scientific explanation looks like, and all of it is observed. One again, evolution has been observed occurring at every level predicted by theory.

 

[Dragan Glas]

Greetings,

As an aside on the Christianity discussion, the first commandment is a reference to Judaism's polytheistic beginnings.

Although Christians read it to mean that there's only one god, it actually means that Yahweh is telling the Israelites that he is to be at the front of the queue of gods for offerings - there are, literally, to be "no other gods before me".

Kindest regards,

James

 

[Deleted member 619]

I should add, by the way, that the explanations given throughout the thread have all been what the full scientific explanation looks like, and James in particular has been very strong.

 

[Dragan Glas]

Greetings,

I should add, by the way, that the explanations given throughout the thread have all been what the full scientific explanation looks like, and James in particular has been very strong.

Thanks, Hack, I think your previous was the strongest, given that it didn't rely on external sources - if your own explanation doesn't meet his criteria for a "practical explanation", I don't know what will.

Kindest regards,

James

 

[Deleted member 619]

I should add to that, just to be sure I haven't missed anything at all, if all speciation were allopatric, evolutionary theory couldn't explain biodiversity, because the entire biosphere would consist of a single population stemming from a single ancestral species with no lateral divergence whatsoever (which would also mean we'd all have to be cannibals).

Once again, we have from creationists an expectation of something that would falsify evolutionary theory at a stroke, rather than something that evolutionary theory predicts. It's exactly as dumb as the crocoduck, or cats giving birth to dogs, and all the other absurdities that can only stem from having no idea of the science.

 

[anning]

@anning You seem to be lacking in reading comprehension .. please take an online course or two, to improve that and then report back in. Not trying to insult you or shame you for your bad spelling and grammar or anything(Hell, I make mistakes galore myself), but any conversation seems moot if you can not comprehend what people are saying.
Also, you can address multiple people and points in one post and there is a very useful edit button.

Btw. is there an option to delete my own posts and/or a spellcheck?

nah nah, you just go and use your magic, pestilence, famine and natural disasters and kill people without asking them or preaching anything at all.

because what did you preached here that made you spoke such things huh? but anyways, you can do it like communists and finish whatever oppulence this world has left now.

 

[anning]

I've noticed you keep saying this but I dont even think this is really true. Where do you live, if I might ask?


As far as I know most of lands of the US were purchased from Spain and France. Were'nt they? Anyway the point of Christianity is to ask Christ to forgive us for our sins. And I guess also to try not to sin anymore. But that last part is a bit relative. For example people might tell me that its wrong for me to smoke but when I tell them smoking helps take the edge off my prior addiction to heroin, they tend to leave me alone.

Nothing about Christianity guarantees me a happy, easy life filled with moral virtue nor does it guarantee a happy, easy world full of moral virtue and I have never claimed that it did. The Bible says Christ was beaten worse than anyone and then was crucified. Isnt He the best example we have of how a christian should live?

Thou shall not kill should read though shall not murder. The word for one is "Ratsatch"(sp?) and I forget what the other one is. Anyway God demanded animal sacrifices and Christ himself killed some fish, cooked them and said "Here, eat some fish."

i will speak it because you lectured me about jerking off, but in europa i dont think that there is any girls is left in europa who does not give most milk. for european girls are most exploited girls and they are very happy with there life thats why they give it most. because unhappy cows cant give enough milks. they must be happy in order to give it most.

so you pissed on thou shall not adultery and i will point it out for numberless times. i will cuz you practically dont follow christ, thou shall not kill, thou shall not steal nothing is followed so your christianity is already dead and churches are getting sold or dismantled. anyways if you have any explanation than come here to argue. otherwise im not interested in you.

do you understand that ? and im not interested in your hypocrisy of bathing like elephant and than again as soon as bath is finished again put sand on yourself. thus such bathing has no value at all.

nor i have interest in you. because you cannot give me anything rational explanation without using holy books quotes, faith or belief and personal experience.

 

[anning]

My god. Looks like Sparhafoc is right..

yes, im he is right that i can go anywhere because i have got something to prostelyze but what you have got ? so you have to be the frong of the well and think in the terms of it. because you never saw how big ocean is.

 

[anning]

Greetings,


Yes, because monkeys gave rise to apes, which includes humans.

Monkeys still exist because their environment (forests) still exist.



You have already said that you won't view any videos I provide, so how can I prove evolution merely be explaining it to you in words? It would take pages and pages of text to do so.

Fossils are like time-stamped photographs. We know when they occurred, and the order in which they occurred. We can see how skeletons have changed over millions of years resulting in species giving rise to other species.

Whether one is looking at the evolution of whales, or Tiktaalik (a transitional species between fish and amphibians), or the finches on the Galapagos (image) that Darwin studied - they, and others, show how species evolve.


Evidence - that's what counts.

We can be told all sorts of things. that doesn't make them true. We may accept things for the time being but we need evidence to be certain.

You may believe a particular woman is your mother - but you don't know for certain until you have a DNA test done.

As I explained earlier, mosaicism and/or chimerism can result in someone having more than one genome. It can even result in children having different DNA than the mother due to her eggs having come from different genomes. At first glance it would seem that the DNA test has failed but further investigation of the mother's genome(s) would prove that she's their mother.


Transplants don't disprove DNA tests.

Although cells from transplants may remain for some time, that doesn't prevent DNA tests from working. No-one takes DNA from transplants in criminal cases.


I have brought greater knowledge because I'm providing actual evidence for what I'm saying through links, all you're doing is proselytising your beliefs that Krishna exists, that your guru is his one true representative, and that the soul exists.

You've already admitted that you don't have any evidence for Krishna, so what's the point in claiming anything based on him?

Kindest regards,

James

than dont waste my time and explain it how ? how one room or speices turns into another room or speices ? huh? because monkeys, apes and humans are all existing right now at once.

so just demonstrate your hypothesis, and just dont speak after observing anything and everything. just demonstrate your hypothesis.
_______________________

your pseudo DNA fallacy is finished with entire hand or legs transplant. so just do tell me how do we recognize our real father as well. or you dont know it yet ? in spite of being so advance ? than what is the value of such advancement ? if you dont know yet how to recognize even real father ?

just do answer to me from point to point without making much fuss. and finish the business.

 

[anning]

Greetings,
I have brought greater knowledge because I'm providing actual evidence for what I'm saying through links

Kindest regards,

James

is that in schools they taught you only this much that use our links, videos, and name of the schools ? because that is greater knowledge ? instead of rubbish dry talking.

is that they all made you only spoon feed ? huh? is that you are not competent to explain anything what you have learned ? because didnt demonstrated your hypothesis. just boasted some rubbish nonsense.

which i dont think would have any effects on you, because british common wealth also touch every field of activities like giving jobs, dressing, trading, economgy, military, laws and justice, politics etc everything is touched by them so i dont think taht brainwashed sheeps like you would have any sense of reality.

i have brought ? you brought nothing yet. its only me who has explained everything so far now.

 

[Deleted member 42253]

There is no common wealth.
No one wants to have anything to do with the UK anymore.

 

[anning]

There is no common wealth.
No one wants to have anything to do with the UK anymore.

oh my poorly educated fellow, you may not know that how they have made act of independence for another 100 years and if they likes than they can withdrawn it at any moment.

now if you likes than you can study it that how all countries are freely independed nations under the dominion status of common wealth. so they are smart enough to speak it empire on which sun never sets, because we work on there constitution. we still dress like them, take that education which they set up for us, military is also same, politcs is also same, everything is same.

and they are smart enough to conclude it that india my slut like country is not fit to be given indepence yet they gave it superficially and we still walk on the road or path chalked by them.

 

[Deleted member 42253]

Educate me then, please show me were and how I can look that up and what is backing up that ludacrist claim of yours, that India is still a colony of the UK.