D
Deleted member 619
Guest
Xenophanes said:You are seriously an idiot.
While you just do it for fun, eh? Fucikng moron.
A natural law is a causal ragularity in the universe.
Bzzzzzzzzzz. Closer, but still wrong. Try to extract your mouth from Aristotle's penis long enough to drop the 'causal' bollocks and you might actually learn something.
The natural Laws in our theories are conjectured laws that we think correspond with actual Natural Laws of the universe.
Wrong again, because there is no distinction between our formulations and the operations of the universe. The universe doesn't operate according to laws. It just behaves the way it does, because its constituents have certain properties. We observe it, then we describe what we observe. Natural laws are our descriptions of the behaviour we observe, specifically of the relationships between certain observed consequences.
The point of all of this is that science is metaphysically agnostic. It makes one single assumption that could be described as metaphysical in any way, namely that solipsism is false but, beyond that, it has no stake in metaphysics. It is, and must remain, ontology free.
Metaphysics is for idiots for whom being wrong doesn't matter, because nobody gives a shit what they have to say.