he_who_is_nobody
Well-Known Member
Yes, there is dishonesty. And if anyone is playing semantics, it is you. You stated, from the start, you wanted examples of single cellular life becoming multicellular life, leading to reproduction. That has been satisfied. Now you are claiming that you want it to be sexual reproduction. I quoted you, and you did not say sexually reproductive. Stop being dishonest and own up to the fact that you are now shifting the goalposts.No lie . It says true multicellular reproductive animal. Are we saying that I didn't mean "sexually reproductive" from the beginning.
It's a game semantics then. Plus, is that the ONLY time I wrote this question? Or did you find one that specifically doesn't contain the word "sexually". Either way. There is no dishonesty.
No one gave you that. What Dragan Glas and I presented on this thread are not colonies, biofilms, or mold. Dragan Glas even went into detail as to why what he gave you was not a biofilm.It also 100% states not to give colony, biofilm or mold examples. That I know this "type of multicellular organism " exists.
However , they are just a group moving together. They can and do return to their individual state from time to time.
So again. No lying. Just misinterpretation of the text
At this point, you are just lying to yourself. To what end, I am not sure.