Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creation...

[aeritano]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

I bet Turtleboy is going to go and claim victory..

which is terrible because he has not proven a single point or presented any real data to support his claims.

I say we troll his channel

 

[Dragan Glas]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Greetings,

I still wish )o( Hytegia )o( had made him do those calculations relating to the Earth-Moon distance.

Kindest regards,

James

 

[lrkun]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Let's forget about puppy. Let's remember his contribution or the lack thereof. :3

 

[Anachronous Rex]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

I bet Turtleboy is going to go and claim victory..

which is terrible because he has not proven a single point or presented any real data to support his claims.

I say we troll his channel

Mod Note: How about we not troll his channel, or endorse doing so on this forum, m'kay?

Many thanks.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Why troll anyone's channel?
The only place NephilimFree matters is in his ring of his internet supporters (and the extensions of yucks and fucks in Shock's chat room), and even then he knows no one of note or standing within the scientific community that will take his bullshit seriously. I would prefer him to be like a child in a sandbox that we humor every so often with attention than a politician, or a person that has actual standing.

Science and the advancement of mankind will roll on without them.

Welcome to the age of Reason, ladies and gentlemen.

 

[Daealis]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Curses! I was away for a while, and upon returning I see that someone has actually referenced Kent Hovind ice-sphere -theories and thinks they are somewhat viable? Wow, I missed a serious schooling here. Good thing Hytegia was on the ball and at least for the most part remained civil when confronted with such bullshit. I didn't know there were anyone who actually can take something like that ice-theory seriously. When compared to most of Kents work the rest of his work starts to seem like fairly reasonable stuff.

 

[ThePuppyTurtle]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

I just linked the debate thread to ThePuppyTurtle's YouTube page. He took the comment down almost as soon as I posted it. I think this means ThePuppyTurtle has withdrawn from the debate. Judging from some of his videos, this was his best option.

Only One Problem, You Posted no such comment on My channel or any Video of Mine (And If You Link ti it on a Vid That Means I Didn't take it down). (Thanks for Reminding me To Link to the Debate Though).

 

[ThePuppyTurtle]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Just an observation given other debates, but why is it that no creationists, it seems, can use the damn quote feature?

I'm to Lazy to Use the Quote tag on and off when I have the Following: ""

 

[ThePuppyTurtle]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

You can put my mistake from that anarchism thread in there too. Good times, that.

Oh, and on topic. If you're reading this Puppy, please please stop with the rainbow thing. It hurts my eyes (though it is fabulously camp.)

LOL!

 

[ThePuppyTurtle]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Comments:

The debate is over, so I'll speak my mind and maybe rant a little.

The following must be observed next timei) both debaters must focus on their respective arguments, counter-arguments, and always provide basis; (ii) the mods need to participate actively or assign a member to moderate the debate; and (iii) there should be a poll thread in which the members can both for or against to resolve the debate after it is closed.

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

 

[Balstrome]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Comments:

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

I would suggest that the reason it's called the League of Reason is because of the large number of atheists.

 

[RigelKentaurusA]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

I'm to Lazy to Use the Quote tag on and off when I have the Following: ""

Sure, but the quote feature streamlines the appearance of the post and makes it easier to read.

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

I would suggest that the reason it's called the League of Reason is because of the large number of atheists.

Win.

ThePuppyTurtle, it's the leage of reason because it's strongly favourable to those who have reasoned out their belief system (or lack there of) without a confirmation bias. I was a Christian for many years before I realised it was nonsense through rational thinking. It was a very slow process, but I eventually overcame it. You'll find that's true of a lot of people here.

 

[australopithecus]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

You are neither as smart nor as funny as you think you are. Less of the attitude, please.

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

I just linked the debate thread to ThePuppyTurtle's YouTube page. He took the comment down almost as soon as I posted it. I think this means ThePuppyTurtle has withdrawn from the debate. Judging from some of his videos, this was his best option.

Only One Problem, You Posted no such comment on My channel or any Video of Mine (And If You Link ti it on a Vid That Means I Didn't take it down). (Thanks for Reminding me To Link to the Debate Though).

The comment in question could have been auto-removed (it did included a weblink), and if that is the case I am sorry I thought you removed it. However, you have removed/not allowed my comments on your channel and videos before and after. Thus, my assuming that you had removed the comment.

Since I seem to have your attention, would you please define evolution in a biological context? The reason I ask this is because I have notice that most creationist do not know the first thing about evolution. I hope you will show me to be wrong on this assumption as well.

 

[borrofburi]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

Since I seem to have your attention, would you please define evolution in a biological context? The reason I ask this is because I have notice that most creationist do not know the first thing about evolution. I hope you will show me to be wrong on this assumption as well.

Hmm... It's strange that they think they can reject the fundamental theoretical basis for an entire field of science without more than a cursory understanding of it (but I agree, it's very much been my experience too). This can happen in all areas of science, but most people understand that they're not knowledgeable enough to do the math for relativity or quantum mechanics, and that they can't explain the weird results those theories rest on, and that those theories have resulted in satellites and faster computers; thus most people understand that they don't understand the theory of relativity or quantum mechanics. Yet somehow when it comes to biology they think the most cursory understanding of the theory of evolution is sufficient for them to be experts that can disprove it (and even win the nobel prize in biology for it)...

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

>.>

This was somewhat of a shock. Let's not turn this into a reason for him to go yucking to NephilimFree and Shock about how he rattled up all those infidels.

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

Quit stealing Neph's lines, Puppy. The Users and moderation have done nothing but treat you with the utmost respect in this forum, but merely posted within a proper critique thread.

 

[lrkun]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

>.>

This was somewhat of a shock. Let's not turn this into a reason for him to go yucking to NephilimFree and Shock about how he rattled up all those infidels.

There's a Disproportionate number of Atheists here. Ironic Given that It's called the League of reason.

Quit stealing Neph's lines, Puppy. The Users and moderation have done nothing but treat you with the utmost respect in this forum, but merely posted within a proper critique thread.

As vague and general his reply may be, it actually refers to my comment that the debate should end with a poll in which the members of this forum decide by a vote who wins or who lost.

In this case, he assumes it will be unfair because the majority will vote against him. He asserts if that were the case, it is ironic for this forum to be called the league of reason.

If I were to advocate his assertion, I would say, that poll is unfair because it's not based on faith (creationist arguments) and reason. But on science based evidence and reason.

If I were to advocate against his assertions, I would say, that poll is fair because it is not based on faith (creationist arguments) and reason. But on science based evidence and reason.

Weird how both positions need no further changes. Haha.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

As vague and general his reply may be, it actually refers to my comment that the debate should end with a poll in which the members of this forum decide by a vote who wins or who lost.

No, actually. I was there when Neph said it - The second part of that comment was a swipe at the entire board. >.>

 

[lrkun]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: "Evidence supports creatio

As vague and general his reply may be, it actually refers to my comment that the debate should end with a poll in which the members of this forum decide by a vote who wins or who lost.

No, actually. I was there when Neph said it - The second part of that comment was a swipe at the entire board. >.>

I see. If that is the case, then his reply to my post makes no sense at all. <.<

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Debate Discussion Thread for: &quot;Evidence supports creatio

I see. If that is the case, then his reply to my post makes no sense at all. <.<

NephilimFree makes sense?