• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Debate about Religion/Science/etc.

TruthfulChristian

New Member
arg-fallbackName="TruthfulChristian"/>
Hello. A few of you guys on League of Reason seem to think that I like to ignore posts to waste people's time.

Well I'm here today because I got a new webcam and I'd be happy to debate anyone here via stickam or blogtv. So yeah, if you wanna debate, either post here or go on my YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/truthfulchristian)

I'd like to discuss about Christianity, Morality, Dinosaurs, Science (mainly biology). I don't want this to be a heated debate where people get angry and cuss at each other. I'm looking forward to more of a calm discussion or a light debate.

Thanks.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
Hello. A few of you guys on League of Reason seem to think that I like to ignore posts to waste people's time.

Well I'm here today because I got a new webcam and I'd be happy to debate anyone here via stickam or blogtv. So yeah, if you wanna debate, either post here or go on my YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/truthfulchristian)

I'd like to discuss about Christianity, Morality, Dinosaurs, Science (mainly biology). I don't want this to be a heated debate where people get angry and cuss at each other. I'm looking forward to more of a calm discussion or a light debate.

Thanks.
You do realize your threads have incited 227 posts on these forums and you haven't addressed a single one of them yet. If you ask me, you should take a little time to answer some of the debates you've already started before starting any more.

I can't speak for everyone here, but I'm getting really sick of you using these boards as your own personal advertising bulletin board.

come-on-guys-look.jpg
 
arg-fallbackName="Aught3"/>
Sounds tempting but you want to cover an awful lot of ground. Would you be willing to discuss one or two of the topics only? I have an old microphone and webcam, but they're probably not the best for a live debate. Perhaps someone else will have a better set-up than me.

To suggest an alternative, I can create a debate thread here and limit it to two posters. That might be one way to prevent you from becoming buried in the mountain of replies to each of your posts :lol:
 
arg-fallbackName="TruthfulChristian"/>
Yeah sure Aught. I'll debate you on these forums as long as only 2 people can post on them. I hate being bombared with trolls like "JustBusiness17". Close this thread if you want.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
Yeah sure Aught. I'll debate you on these forums as long as only 2 people can post on them. I hate being bombared with trolls like "JustBusiness17". Close this thread if you want.
You have a pretty loose definition of a troll. My complaints about you are legit. But if you're going to stop advertising your YT channel and engage in debate, I will gladly put on a spectator hat and watch from the sidelines. This is going to be awesome!
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnug215"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
Yeah sure Aught. I'll debate you on these forums as long as only 2 people can post on them. I hate being bombared with trolls like "JustBusiness17". Close this thread if you want.


But the "troll", Justbusiness17, has a point; you have started many threads that you've since failed to respond to.

Pointing out the truth doesn't make him a troll. Sure, you may have good reasons for not wanting to respond to those threads; for example that all the responses were overwhelming and too numerous, but I think explaining that to all the people who took time to respond to you might be in order, no?
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
I'd like to discuss about Christianity, Morality, Dinosaurs, Science (mainly biology). I don't want this to be a heated debate where people get angry and cuss at each other. I'm looking forward to more of a calm discussion or a light debate.

Thanks.

well, we got specified sections on this forum for those topic.

christianity and morality fall under "Religion and irreligion"
dinosaurs and science fall under "science and information"

but as already pointed out, it requires your presence.
you do not have address all posts, that would be insane. but it would be prefered if you address most points especially those adressed directly at you.
though not required, it can be useful to mention the source of your information.
people can make mistakes by interperating information incorrect or using outdated information or bad sources.
when this happens discussions can become quite frustrating for no reason, and it happens that people are arguing with different definitions for the same thing, which make it very difficult to even agree on the most simple things.

one other thing, the most important thing to do is make a clear statement about what you want to debate.
"I'd like to discuss about Christianity, Morality, Dinosaurs, Science (mainly biology)." is extremely vague, you can find dozens of different topics about christianity just here which range from one side to another.

in short;
if you want to debate, you must participate!
 
arg-fallbackName="RyuOni1989"/>
TruthfulChristian seems to think anyone that argues against him is trolling him.

So with that in mind, I propose a Slogan. How about this; "Trolling With Logic"- Simple, to the point, and it works.
 
arg-fallbackName="Squagnut"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
Yeah sure Aught. I'll debate you on these forums as long as only 2 people can post on them. I hate being bombared with trolls like "JustBusiness17". Close this thread if you want.

If you don't like the way forums work, why did you join this one?
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
nemesiss said:
people can make mistakes by interpreting information incorrectly or using outdated information or bad sources.
Quit trolling him! The bible is the perfect word of god. Its true! I know because it was written in the bible which is the perfect word of god!
:lol:
nemesiss said:
one other thing, the most important thing to do is make a clear statement about what you want to debate.
I've pointed this out to him in the past but I don't blame him for his lack of precision. Religious points of argument tend to be as solid as a wet noodles. In order to have any chance at all in a debate, they need to grab as many of these wet noodles as they can and wildly thrash their opponents. Obfuscation and victory by forfeit are the goals. Endurance is key ;)

wet+noodles.jpg
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
JustBusiness17 said:
nemesiss said:
people can make mistakes by interpreting information incorrectly or using outdated information or bad sources.
Quit trolling him! The bible is the perfect word of god. Its true! I know because it was written in the bible which is the perfect word of god!
:lol:
nemesiss said:
one other thing, the most important thing to do is make a clear statement about what you want to debate.
I've pointed this out to him in the past but I don't blame him for his lack of precision. Religious points of argument tend to be as solid as a wet noodles. In order to have any chance at all in a debate, they need to grab as many of these wet noodles as they can and wildly thrash their opponents. Obfuscation and victory by forfeit are the goals. Endurance is key ;)

that may be true, but if we are going to dismiss him as a troll while he is truthful about having a debate, then we are no better then a bunch of hypocrits.
we should give him the chance to proof he really is willing to debate, even with so many people stacked against his position (like waza-manoo).
if he has a valid argument we shouldn't silence him.

then again, if he IS here just to troll or go into a post and run game... then he deserves all the name-calling he gets.
it might sound gullible, but we want to advocate truth, reason, enlightment and freedom of speech... we must allow him to speak, even if it complete and utter nonsense.
 
arg-fallbackName="Prolescum"/>
nemesiss said:
it might sound gullible, but we want to advocate truth, reason, enlightment and freedom of speech... we must allow him to speak, even if it complete and utter nonsense.


Reason prevails.

I, for one, look forward to reading this discussion.
 
arg-fallbackName="nasher168"/>
Oh hallelujah! He responds! If you are willing to debate openly and publicly and adhere to a few ground rules, I would personally love to take you up on this offer of yours on BlogTV or Stickcam. Obviously these rules wouldn't be one sided-you would have a say in them.
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnomesmusher"/>
This is getting ridiculous. I say if he keeps making these hit and run threads they should be considered spam and closed. It's so obvious they're nothing more than a vehicle to promote his channel.

Sure we value free speech but we also don't let people spam advertisements on the forums either. If he actually engages in debate then let him say anything he wants, otherwise it's worthless spam.
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
Gnomesmusher said:
This is getting ridiculous. I say if he keeps making these hit and run threads they should be considered spam and closed. It's so obvious they're nothing more than a vehicle to promote his channel.

Sure we value free speech but we also don't let people spam advertisements on the forums either. If he actually engages in debate then let him say anything he wants, otherwise it's worthless spam.

i do not see a problem with that.
if someone wants to make an ass of themselves in public im fine with that, as long as no one get hurts.
 
arg-fallbackName=")O( Hytegia )O("/>
I've offered to debate him several times over - but he has never responded to anything I've had to say.

I'd love to enter a debate with him. It would be my pleasure to exchange thoughts, and a wonder to see proof of God. I'll convert on the spot!
 
arg-fallbackName="Squawk"/>
TruthfulChristian said:
Hello. A few of you guys on League of Reason seem to think that I like to ignore posts to waste people's time.

Err, yeah, that about sums it up.
TC said:
Well I'm here today because I got a new webcam and I'd be happy to debate anyone here via stickam or blogtv.

On what subject, precisely? Your youtube channel vids and posts here display a profound lack of understanding of science in general, and evolution in particular. Any "debate", would consist pretty much entirely of you misrepresenting science and me correcting you, only for you to deny or simply ignore any legitimate point raised. I'll take you up on the offer when you have responded appropriately to my critique of your videos in the appropriate thread around here and have satisfied me that you have actually read and understood anything posted. Otherwise I won't waste my time.
TC said:
So yeah, if you wanna debate, either post here or go on my YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/truthfulchristian)
I've watched some of your vids, I loled, then I critiqued. Go read up.
TC said:
I'd like to discuss about Christianity, Morality
Which aspects in particular? Should I happen to conclude that you have indeed learned anything about evolution from my posts, and thus are a potential opponent for a discussion/debate, I would like to discuss Leviticus with you since it should cover a good portion of my current thinking on Christianity and morality.
TC said:
Dinosaurs
You're gonna have to be far more specific, dino's as we commonly think of them roamed the planet for over 100 million years, and still do today in the form of birds.
TC said:
, Science (mainly biology).
No chance until you display any basic level of understanding.
TC said:
I don't want this to be a heated debate where people get angry and cuss at each other. I'm looking forward to more of a calm discussion or a light debate.

Thanks.

First go address my critique of your vids. Then we can talk civility.
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnomesmusher"/>
nemesiss said:
Gnomesmusher said:
This is getting ridiculous. I say if he keeps making these hit and run threads they should be considered spam and closed. It's so obvious they're nothing more than a vehicle to promote his channel.

Sure we value free speech but we also don't let people spam advertisements on the forums either. If he actually engages in debate then let him say anything he wants, otherwise it's worthless spam.

i do not see a problem with that.
if someone wants to make an ass of themselves in public im fine with that, as long as no one get hurts.

Like I said before, there's a difference between letting someone have their say no matter how stupid it is and the difference between someone just spamming/advertising/trolling.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
Gnomesmusher said:
nemesiss said:
i do not see a problem with that.
if someone wants to make an ass of themselves in public im fine with that, as long as no one get hurts.

Like I said before, there's a difference between letting someone have their say no matter how stupid it is and the difference between someone just spamming/advertising/trolling.
Agreed... If he had something unobtrusive written in his signature and was simply a forum participant, it would be one thing, but this guy keeps starting threads just with the explicit intent of driving traffic towards his youtube channel.

Take a look at his channel stats:

358bd5z.jpg

I'm really curious as to how this guy's channel views are so close to his total upload views. This is so highly skewed from the norm on youtube that he must be engaged in some rather extensive self promotions on the internet. Why tolerate it here?
 
Back
Top