Debate about Religion/Science/etc.

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Take a look at his channel stats:

I'm really curious as to how this guy's channel views are so close to his total upload views. This is so highly skewed from the norm on youtube that he must be engaged in some rather extensive self promotions on the internet. Why tolerate it here?

The only time I've seen a skew worse than that was when /b/ decided to make a user named Lukas famous out of nowhere.
He had 112 channel views, 5 uploads, 119 upload views, and then 16,000 subs. youTube banned the kid for suspected modding - but unbanned him when moot messaged YouTube and informed them that, indeed, the subsciptions were genuine. All 100% of his movies were pure miscelanious nonsense of him playing with toys.

But I digress - results like that only come by the work of trolls herding viewers toward a spacific channel... This seems to be the case.

 

[MillionSword]

So is this debate gonna take place or what?

 

[Deleted member 619]

Where's the popcorn smiley?


Ah, well. This one will do:

 

[Aught3]

So is this debate gonna take place or what?

I've PMed TC to try and arrange the scope of a debate on this site - so far no response but I'd give him a bit more time to get around to reading it.

Btw, after some testing with CosmicSpork mods now have the ability to create threads limited to only specific users. So if any other leaguers want to hold a debate, PM me and I'll set it up for you.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

So is this debate gonna take place or what?

I've PMed TC to try and arrange the scope of a debate on this site - so far no response but I'd give him a bit more time to get around to reading it.

Btw, after some testing with CosmicSpork mods now have the ability to create threads limited to only specific users. So if any other leaguers want to hold a debate, PM me and I'll set it up for you.

I'm dieing to be in this - he wanted 2.
PLEASE?
Then he can't whine about Atheists teaming up on him - because there will be a Theist also.

 

[monitoradiation]

TC: You can start with responding to your own threads, for one. Then we might actually be interested in what you have to say while unscripted. If a prepared paragraph is full of things LOR people have objections to, then rest assured that you won't get through a sentence in real time. Just respond to your own threads. For ease, I've included the links.

http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3817&start=0

http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3895&start=0

Go.

 

[Deleted member 619]

Interestingly, I have chosen TC's fuckwitted misrepresentation of abiogenesis as my entry for the 90 second pwnage in the pwnage olympics. :mrgreen:

I love the 'facts' he presents from his book of wibble, but 90 seconds wasn't enough time to address all the vacuous arse-gravy he presented there.

 

[JustBusiness17]

Interestingly, I have chosen TC's fuckwitted misrepresentation of abiogenesis as my entry for the 90 second pwnage in the pwnage olympics. :mrgreen:

I love the 'facts' he presents from his book of wibble, but 90 seconds wasn't enough time to address all the vacuous arse-gravy he presented there.

90 second pwnage? That sounds like my 30SecondLogic idea... Too bad nobody is interested :cry:

 

[Deleted member 619]

Done.

 

[JustBusiness17]

Done.

Sympathy FTW!

 

[Don-Sama]

 

[TruthfulChristian]

Me and him are debating.

Check it out.

http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=3948&p=52351#p52351

I may take up to 24 hours for a response though. I check this thread several times a day.

Moderators, you can close this thread if you want. I've posted far to many threads now and I feel as if it's wasting Forum space. This thread didn't really have anything to do with "religion and irreligion" - that's the title of this forum section.

 

[JustBusiness17]

Me and him are debating.

Check it out.

http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=3948&p=52351#p52351

I may take up to 24 hours for a response though. I check this thread several times a day.

Moderators, you can close this thread if you want. I've posted far to many threads now and I feel as if it's wasting Forum space. This thread didn't really have anything to do with "religion and irreligion" - that's the title of this forum section.

Lets keep it for prosperity... Your going to be a legend on these forums. Why would we want to erase your legacy?

 

[nemesiss]

Me and him are debating.

Check it out.

http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=3948&p=52351#p52351

I may take up to 24 hours for a response though. I check this thread several times a day.

Moderators, you can close this thread if you want. I've posted far to many threads now and I feel as if it's wasting Forum space. This thread didn't really have anything to do with "religion and irreligion" - that's the title of this forum section.

Lets keep it for prosperity... Your going to be a legend on these forums. Why would we want to erase your legacy?

he is certainly is an interesting character, so it would be a waste... to NOT keep him.
i read through the debate and found quite an number of errors in his rebuttal (also a few in Aught3) which make his whole argument invalid.
two big factors are his understanding of the geological differences of africa and the properties of fur, for which i could write a whole counter-argument.