Duvelthehobbit666
New Member
I have thought of a nice analogy concerning the creationism/evolution debate. You are free to use it if you will. So here is goes:
Lets say that you have a nice piece of high quality beef. You want to go and cook it and enjoy it. Now lets say that there are two people you can go to for advice on how to cook the meat. You must go to one of the persons. One of the people you can go to is head janitor at Microsoft. He does his work very well and the people praise his work. However, he is not good in the kitchen and his culinary expertise is very low. The other person is head chef at a restaurant with a Michelin star. He has a great understanding of cooking and is an expert in the cooking of high quality meats. Now when asked to choose one out of these two people, you would most likely choose the chef. This is for most people an easy question to answer. So when it comes to the creationism/evolution debate, why would you choose the person who doesn't know anything about evolution?
I hope you like this analogy.
Lets say that you have a nice piece of high quality beef. You want to go and cook it and enjoy it. Now lets say that there are two people you can go to for advice on how to cook the meat. You must go to one of the persons. One of the people you can go to is head janitor at Microsoft. He does his work very well and the people praise his work. However, he is not good in the kitchen and his culinary expertise is very low. The other person is head chef at a restaurant with a Michelin star. He has a great understanding of cooking and is an expert in the cooking of high quality meats. Now when asked to choose one out of these two people, you would most likely choose the chef. This is for most people an easy question to answer. So when it comes to the creationism/evolution debate, why would you choose the person who doesn't know anything about evolution?
I hope you like this analogy.