D
Deleted member 619
Guest
Keep banging the rocks together, lad. Eventually, a spark of logic might happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lot's. It gives anyone the ability to be judge and executioner. As noted in the video, there are people out there who will push this to the limit, and shot someone even if there is little to no threat to their being. It has been found that stand your ground has not resulted in a decrease in violent crime, and has lead to an increase in homicides, and fire arm related injuries.It makes it legal to use lethal force if serious bodily harm, forcible felony or threat of death is evident. What is wrong with this?
Obtuse.Keep banging the rocks together, lad. Eventually, a spark of logic might happen.
Vast majority of gun shot wounds in the U.S. are non fatal and the vast majority of defensive uses don't involve actually firing the gun. The possibility of gun homicides is just that a possibility but then rare considering the ratios.Lot's. It gives anyone the ability to be judge and executioner.
They can be prosecuted as it is stated in the law that you have to articulate serious bodily harm as a minimum or a forcible felony as a minimum or threat to life as a minimum. If they were not prosecuted there is something more to the story. It is also a possibility of a failure of government.As noted in the video, there are people out there who will push this to the limit, and shot someone even if there is little to no threat to their being.
Yes if you potentially use a gun there will be an increase in stats related to gun use. This doesn't really mean anything without consideration of a reduction of crime. If a crime or self defense mostly goes unreported how do you accurately track these? There is no requirement to file a report if no legal damages are sustained. We are missing information. Obviously if people don't report it you can't actually track it accurately. There is no crime if you don't report the crime.It has been found that stand your ground has not resulted in a decrease in violent crime, and has lead to an increase in homicides, and fire arm related injuries.
Looking at someone sidewise is not the legal standard that the law allows for. Again you have to justify the above conditions in order not to be prosecuted under the definitions of the law. Anything else is a complication and not the result of following he law.In short the stand your ground laws just make it too easy for some to shot another person if they look at them sideways. That certainly would make me feel safer.
I never used the kiddy time play pool argument of:
I know you are but what am I.
I never made the argument Qanons or x people can only read x material.
If I was Qanon wouldn't I be reading or watching Qanon and not on a U.K. based forum?
View attachment 462
View attachment 463
No it literally isn't in black and white. You are Bozo the clown.
If I was Qanon wouldn't I be reading or watching Qanon and not on a U.K. based forum? That is kind of retarded logic don't you think?
You're posting pictorial evidence showing that I am correct - how bizarre that you post a picture of you saying exactly the thing you pretend you didn't say!
First off where is your evidence that I am a Qanon guy where's your source for this? Where is the argument at all that I believe in strictly Qanon arguments?You contended that if you were QAnon you would be reading or watching QAnon material, and you wouldn't be on a forum which you say is in the UK. It's a forum, QAnonGuy - it's STILL there, on this very page, everyone can read it, who do you think you're fooling?
You are the one assuming intent rather than proving it.This is obviously nonsensical dreck, and you can't even own it.
I guess you realize that the 'retarded logic' insult rather backfired so you're trying a game of 'nuhh uhhh' like any mature, capable adult would....
Ah so you have no proof basically to even base the argument. Bye.I already asked you, QanonClown - when you write such inanity to me transparently attempting to manipulate the arguments in a way even children would see through, you have to make a honking clown noise. It saves me time.
Ah so you have no proof basically to even base the argument. Bye.
If I was Qanon wouldn't I be reading or watching Qanon and not on a U.K. based forum?
For example, they can look at post 81
The best bit about that entire exchange is that he's denying his own antecedent and then denying having ever denied it and citing his denial as evidence that he didn't deny it. It's fucking recursive wrongness. Almost spherical! rofl.
If I was Qanon wouldn't I be reading or watching Qanon and not on a U.K. based forum?
It would be difficult without mirth to conclude otherwise.Whatever the case, it's rampantly clear that this is his first encounter with logical discourse.
I am a Qanon guy