Awesome U.S. gun/defensive laws.

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

Again, everyone here can read. Your obvious manipulation is confounded even by your selective images.

You are claiming that HWIN thinks X about me and have posted a picture of HWIN speaking to another person altogether. This is so obviously deceitful and manipulative - who do you think you're going to fool?

Yet supposedly it is me being unreasonable here, despite you repeatedly contriving bullshit like this.

Spar he was talking to Hackenslash yet he still said to get on with the topic even when dealing with Hackenslash which is hostile as well as you. Is it so hard to keep on topic and ignore all this crap altogether? I didn't start this nonsense you guys did.

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

Considering even he thinks you should drop your contentious nonsense and remain on topic says a lot. Even a well known member thinks you are out of line.

Reading comprehension is not your forte, now is it? So where in that did I say any of that?

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

Reading comprehension is not your forte, now is it? So where in that did I say any of that?

You argued that people stay on topic yes? Do you think people shouldn't remain on topic?

 

[Sparhafoc]

Spar he was talking to Hackenslash yet he still said to get on with the topic even when dealing with Hackenslash which is hostile as well as you. Is it so hard to keep on topic and ignore all this crap altogether? I didn't start this nonsense you guys did.

So he wasn't talking to me as you SPECIFICALLY SAID?

So he wasn't talking about this thread at all?

So all your prior post was completely manufactured bullshit?

Yes, yes... that's exactly my point.

I told you Qbro - you're not actually fooling anyone.

 

[Sparhafoc]

You argued that people stay on topic yes? Do you think people shouldn't remain on topic?

So now you're telling HIM what HE meant?

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

You argued that people stay on topic yes?

No. In fact, I said that hackenslash should talk around you and bring something of substance.

Do you think people shouldn't remain on topic?

This topic is far too boring to ask people to stick to the OP. Remember, this thread was being ignored because it was so boring until you tagged people into it. I honestly do not see why you keep getting upset that people who did not come to this thread naturally will not stick to your OP.

 

[Sparhafoc]

No. In fact, I said that hackenslash should talk around you and bring something of substance.

It's impressive how deceitful he managed to be with so few words, and just one picture.

 

[Sparhafoc]

This topic is far too boring to ask people to stick to the OP. Remember, this thread was being ignored because it was so boring until you tagged people into it. I honestly do not see why you keep getting upset that people who did not come to this thread naturally will not stick to your OP.

As far as I am concerned, the topic of this thread is: Come at me bros.

At this point, it would take an awful lot of evidence to convince me that this isn't true of ALL Qbro's posts on this forum.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

No. In fact, I said that hackenslash should talk around you and bring something of substance.

Something of "substance" in the context of a thread is remaining on topic yes or no?

This topic is far too boring to ask people to stick to the OP. Remember, this thread was being ignored because it was so boring until you tagged people into it. I honestly do not see why you keep getting upset that people who did not come to this thread naturally will not stick to your OP.

If this doesn't hold their attention then click "unwatch" and ignore it. This is what many other people have told me. How ironic that they can't follow their own advice.

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

This topic is far too boring to ask people to stick to the OP. Remember, this thread was being ignored because it was so boring until you tagged people into it. I honestly do not see why you keep getting upset that people who did not come to this thread naturally will not stick to your OP.

I realized that this is actually a different thread than the "Come at me bros" thread. They all blend into each other since the OPs of all BoganUSAFFLClerk are practically the same. However, that means:

Sigh. You don't think given the context it is the first reaction IN THIS THREAD that was HOSTILE?

I was correct that the context was not referring to the first reaction of this thread. Amazing.

No. In fact, I said that hackenslash should talk around you and bring something of substance.

Something of "substance" in the context of a thread is remaining on topic yes or no?

No. If I wanted to tell hackenslash to stick to the OP, I would have told him to stick to the OP. Telling someone to state something of substance on a trash fire of a thread like this usually asks them to give out a new topic to get the thread to talk about.

If this doesn't hold their attention then click "unwatch" and ignore it. This is what many other people have told me. How ironic that they can't follow their own advice.

I do not have this thread on watch. However, what this (and most of your other threads) become is just too much fun to turn away from.

 

[Sparhafoc]

Something of "substance" in the context of a thread is remaining on topic yes or no?

You are now arguing with HWIN to try to manipulate him into agreeing with your rendition of what he meant by what he said.

This is outright deranged and narcissistic.

If this doesn't hold their attention then click "unwatch" and ignore it. This is what many other people have told me. How ironic that they can't follow their own advice.

Who gave you what advice?

Did I give you that advice?

Then isn't it ironic that having just been shown ONCE AGAIN intentionally manipulating the written record to deceive people like the troll you are, that the way you attempt to distract from this is by once again trying the exact same thing.

 

[Sparhafoc]

However, what this (and most of your other threads) become is just too much fun to turn away from.

Is it the oversized shoes and squeaky nose, or the flailing from under the bridge which is more amusing?

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

Is it the oversized shoes and squeaky nose, or the flailing from under the bridge which is more amusing?

The latter.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

You are now arguing with HWIN to try to manipulate him into agreeing with your rendition of what he meant by what he said.

It would mean to cut your insults and talk of something of substance. Regardless the results are the same.

Who gave you what advice?
Did I give you that advice?
Then isn't it ironic that having just been shown ONCE AGAIN intentionally manipulating the written record to deceive people like the troll you are, that the way you attempt to distract from this is by once again trying the exact same thing.

I believe the argument was over me ignoring someone and it not working as intended and then the suggestion was raised that one could simply ignore the person manually or something similar. It doesn't really matter who argued what as the forum seems to be in agreement as no disagreement with that suggestion was made.

Yet again I have argued to stay on topic and stop chasing rabbits. Again the thread is about ridiculous gun laws not short comings of members.

 

[Sparhafoc]

It would mean to cut your insults and talk of something of substance. Regardless the results are the same.

The hubris is absurd, an overplayed caricature that for me calls into question whether anything you've ever written here is true.

HWIN told you what he means. I am also capable of reading what HWIN said and what he said he means.

Your insistence that whatever you declare is gospel is batshit and dismissed as emotional ravings.

I believe the argument was over me ignoring someone and it not working as intended and then the suggestion was raised that one could simply ignore the person manually or something similar. It doesn't really matter who argued what as the forum seems to be in agreement as no disagreement with that suggestion was made.

As usual, everyone can still read what you first wrote and note that, rather than acknowledge that your rendition was completely manufactured, you try and spin it to pretend you were right all along.

Yet again I have argued to stay on topic and stop chasing rabbits. Again the thread is about ridiculous gun laws not short comings of members.

And I have already informed you very clearly that the idea that you tell me what to do provokes only amusement. You do not control discussion, and when you make absurd statements about 'third world people' or blaming brown people for violence in the US, then the topic becomes about that regardless of how many toys you throw out of the pram. Perhaps you should learn to shut YOUR trap and stick on topic before expecting others to politely ignore your vapid racist dreck.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

The hubris is absurd, an overplayed caricature that for me calls into question whether anything you've ever written here is true.
HWIN told you what he means. I am also capable of reading what HWIN said and what he said he means.

Something of substance doesn't mean weak insults.

As usual, everyone can still read what you first wrote and note that, rather than acknowledge that your rendition was completely manufactured, you try and spin it to pretend you were right all along.

Did I not repeatedly say stay on topic multiple times?

And I have already informed you very clearly that the idea that you tell me what to do provokes only amusement. You do not control discussion, and when you make absurd statements about 'third world people' or blaming brown people for violence in the US, then the topic becomes about that regardless of how many toys you throw out of the pram. Perhaps you should learn to shut YOUR trap and stick on topic before expecting others to politely ignore your vapid racist dreck.

Ironic. You the one that came here starting the insults. Whatever dude I can simply ignore you by using outside software I don't need the ignore function on this forum anymore. In the end I still control you.