According to LEROY's condescending dismissal of someone... who? Can't remember... maybe me, maybe any other member here... it's a bit like the Trump attacked me on Twitter Wall of Fame http://www.highsnobiety.com/2017/07/13/stephen-colbert-trump-attacked-me-on-twitter-hall-fame/ it could literally be anyone.
Anyway, according to that...
Which, if I may be so bold, means in legible English:
From previous threads, it is obvious (to me) that you are not even willing to look at the arguments for the existence of my preferred god, or to make an honest effort to understand those arguments.
So here's a nice thread all its own where LEROY can tell us about those wonderful arguments for the existence of God - all those arguments none of us are already patently familiar with, probably because we were too lazy or too dishonest to unquestioningly accept!
It'd be nice to run a partner thread where we put bets on which arguments LEROY's going to use, but that might not be very fair - it might put too much pressure on him to perform, so to speak, and we wouldn't want any excuses for any ensuing flaccidity, would we?
So here's your platform, LEROY:
Anyway, according to that...
LEROY said:form previous threads, it is obvious that your are not even willing to look at the arguments for the existence of God and make an honest effort to understand them,
Which, if I may be so bold, means in legible English:
From previous threads, it is obvious (to me) that you are not even willing to look at the arguments for the existence of my preferred god, or to make an honest effort to understand those arguments.
So here's a nice thread all its own where LEROY can tell us about those wonderful arguments for the existence of God - all those arguments none of us are already patently familiar with, probably because we were too lazy or too dishonest to unquestioningly accept!
It'd be nice to run a partner thread where we put bets on which arguments LEROY's going to use, but that might not be very fair - it might put too much pressure on him to perform, so to speak, and we wouldn't want any excuses for any ensuing flaccidity, would we?
So here's your platform, LEROY: