VyckRo
New Member
borrofburi
on this video
The atheists ignorance, do not stop to amaze me.
Atheists always want to prove that non-atheist ar wrong.
That is what red herring means:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring_(idiom)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi#Red_herring
First the problem with witches, is only a factor from My video!.
So that is a ~red herring". from you!.
Now T.fool is the one that imposes his vision, about witches, a vision that comes from harry poter ( The only form of culture, which he knows)
Witches have existed and exist, regardless of what atheists believe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVUonfj-uJk
Witches, shamans, witch-doctors, are part of history, no one denies their existence, with the exception of a few atheists. ( The claim issued by these people is a totally different discussion)
T.Fool's argument is. - the Bible mentions the existence of witches, T. Fool, does not believe in witches therefore the bible is false.
Question for intelligent atheists:
What fallacy is this?
So borrofburi If you imagine witches, as old women riding brooms ... LoL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchcraft
The picture you have in mind comes from Francisco Goya ( and has nothing in common with reality)
http://www.spaightwoodgalleries.com/Pages/Goya11.html
PS.
I do not use the same fallacy as T.foot, because I give a historical picture of witches.
**his entire video on thunderfoot is saying that TF is delusional to question whether or not witches exist. He does this by defining witch *not* as someone who uses rituals to control the supernatural, but as someone who uses rituals to *attempt* to control the supernatural. Which is a red herring anyway: TF is addressing the idea that witchcraft has any effect on reality, to so obviously define words differently so his video becomes unintelligible (and then make a video wondering why, under new definitions, the things thunderfoot says are silly) is intellectual dishonesty.
***he has a great fondness for saying the equivalence of "you said x but if we look at y, x doesn't apply therefore x is always wrong"
****Oh, and I almost forgot: he's one of those who thinks Dawkins really believes life on earth was intelligently designed by aliens. He doesn't, he suggested it as the most likely reality of intelligent design *if* intelligent design had any merit (which it doesn't); i.e. given the hypothetical that ID is true, is it more likely that an omniscient omnipotent benevolent intelligence (super complex thing) did it, or that evolution is still the source of life, and some aliens did it (and since aliens are vastly less complicated and unlikely, occham's razor says aliens). In reality, Dawkins does not think ID is at all true, and does not believe, as some either ignorant or actively dishonest creationists claim, that aliens started life on this earth.
on this video
The atheists ignorance, do not stop to amaze me.
Atheists always want to prove that non-atheist ar wrong.
That is what red herring means:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring_(idiom)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi#Red_herring
First the problem with witches, is only a factor from My video!.
So that is a ~red herring". from you!.
Now T.fool is the one that imposes his vision, about witches, a vision that comes from harry poter ( The only form of culture, which he knows)
Witches have existed and exist, regardless of what atheists believe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVUonfj-uJk
Witches, shamans, witch-doctors, are part of history, no one denies their existence, with the exception of a few atheists. ( The claim issued by these people is a totally different discussion)
T.Fool's argument is. - the Bible mentions the existence of witches, T. Fool, does not believe in witches therefore the bible is false.
Question for intelligent atheists:
What fallacy is this?
So borrofburi If you imagine witches, as old women riding brooms ... LoL!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchcraft
The picture you have in mind comes from Francisco Goya ( and has nothing in common with reality)
http://www.spaightwoodgalleries.com/Pages/Goya11.html
PS.
I do not use the same fallacy as T.foot, because I give a historical picture of witches.