mechtheist
Member
It's hopeless, BoganUSAFFLClerk [whjich I always see as Bogusasfuck for some reason] is incapable of seeing the implications of his words and reads too much BS into all kinds of shit like what 'normal' means. It's very clear he doesn't approve of gays and believes them to be bad for society but he can't come up with a reason other than we don't reproduce, which is a bogus as fuck argument and would mean all folks who choose to not have kids are deviants, abnormal, and somehow will doom society. Plus, telling a lot of these people who commit suicide, usually youngsters, that they should just grow a spine is really horrific, heartless and hateful.Another topic you know nothing about; is anyone surprised?
And no one said otherwise. I have always agreed that homosexuals are a minority. So please stop burning straw. However, will you ever actually address the point and defend your claim? You have failed to define normal human society yet again, so I guess not. Did you realize that without defining normal human society, you are just holding an empty bag?
I already rejected your attempt to equate normal human society to simply reproduction. That is far too narrow a definition for such a term. Beyond that, you already agreed that homosexuals could reproduce; thus, this argument is moot. Why you keep bringing it up when you already agree it is wrong is beyond me.
Straw man. Will you ever argue in good faith?
Laughably myopic. I reject your definition of ordinary human society as simply reproduction. That is far too narrow a description for such a term. Look what it forces you to say—what a joke.
Several actually, pleasure is one of them. Someone that is born producing a low sperm count still has genitals, right?
Again, several functions, such as a third hand.
You realize that there are very few parts of our anatomy that have a 1:1 use, right? And you recognize that our anatomy is not tied to a Plutonic ideal, right?
What if I decided to use my mouth to give pleasure to my partner's genitals? Again, our anatomies are not tied to a Plutonic ideal.
You realize that having a child does not negate being a homosexual, right? One can do both. Again, you are exposing your biases and shallow thinking on this topic.
You realize that having a child does not negate being a homosexual, right? One can do both. Again, you are exposing your biases and shallow thinking on this topic. However, I am glad you dropped the suicide talk. I will take that as you admitting you are wrong. Thank you.
Really? That is not your argument? I must ask, what is your argument then? Because when I first asked you to cite a source for your claim, all you have done to support it is point out that homosexuality is a minority. So, please point out exactly how what I said above does not sum up your argument thus far. Because I agree, your premise is faulty.
This reply appears to have no bearing on the point I was making. Want to try again?
Again with the straw man. Will you ever argue in good faith? I guess when you know you are wrong and have been repeatedly exposed as wrong, erecting strawmen is all one can do.
Since deviant means departing from norms or standards, it becomes the norm or standard when one adds deviancy to society. Duh.
If only you would define normal human society and provide a citation for your original claim, you might start to be making a point. But, until then, your semantics will get you nowhere.
You said back in the 70s when talking about miscegenation. Just because you can make a bigoted statement does not mean it means anything. Provide a citation that homosexuality is against normal human society or keep being a joke.
I doubt that.
That is because you already have all the benefits. Also, glad to see that you admit to whining. Not sure why you would think that is a backfire on me.
Exactly. We already know you are not wise.
I doubt that.
I doubt that.
I do not think this is likely. There are tons of people in the US that are proud to have ancestors that fought for the Confederacy. It would not surprise me to find out that BoganUSAFFLClerk is one of them.
Wow. So when I summed up your argument as:
I was right. Well, glad to see you admit it now even though you could not earlier.
Yeah. That fits you well. I mean, so far, you have only supported your opinion about homosexuals with other opinions you hold. You provide no evidence for anything and have only played semantics to defend your opinion.
The economy and pandemic.
Special pleading.
Citation needed.
Says the guy that is whining on the internet.
Yet, no one cares about your feelings. Provide a citation.
This is a modus operandi for BoganUSAFFLClerk, reading the headlines but not the article.