• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
21st Demon Lord said:
Educate me then, please show me were and how I can look that up and what is backing up that ludacrist claim of yours, that India is still a colony of the UK.
Click to expand...

than why we dress like you ? why we have same constitution which british government left for us ? we military arrangement, politics, and all those laws like land aquisicition act, which you created to deplete our economy still exists ? why everything still exists ? ( and that is only one law from all 3500 laws which your all big big british man made for hampering us )

what is ridiculous in this ? why we have everything intact yet ? just educate the fools like me tham ( wise one ) come on, answer me now. why still everything is same ? why ? explain it profoundly than.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 42253"/>
So ... there is nothing to back up your claims and nothing that could educate on that topic.
In that case, I expect and apology for calling me uneducated.

Btw. this is how Brits dress:
itizoyd007j51.jpg

Now ... I might be wrong here, but I do not think thats how Indians dress.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
21st Demon Lord said:
So ... there is nothing to back up your claims and nothing that could educate on that topic.
In that case, I expect and apology for calling me uneducated.
Click to expand...

try to understand cherry picker will full ignorant, that no one can awake those who are pretending to be sleeping.

now i should seek apology from you ? huh? for what ? want to create scene like that cutie pit Led Zeppelin and say that this is not my forum ?

since admin is already partial and not neutral against me so want to apply give dog bad name and hang it ?

and yet we blame communists that they kill people and does injustice, but what is the difference between you both capitalists and communists ? did you not seen anything that we behave like you.
 
arg-fallbackName="Deleted member 42253"/>
Okey, time to try out the ignore function.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
anning said:
nah nah, you just go and use your magic, pestilence, famine and natural disasters and kill people without asking them or preaching anything at all.
Click to expand...

That's right 21st Demon Lord - you're an evil sorcerer who uses magic to effect natural disasters to murder people.

I assume anning is thinking 21st century BCE.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
anning said:
i will speak it because you lectured me about jerking off, but in europa i dont think that there is any girls is left in europa who does not give most milk. for european girls are most exploited girls and they are very happy with there life thats why they give it most. because unhappy cows cant give enough milks. they must be happy in order to give it most.

so you pissed on thou shall not adultery and i will point it out for numberless times. i will cuz you practically dont follow christ, thou shall not kill, thou shall not steal nothing is followed so your christianity is already dead and churches are getting sold or dismantled. anyways if you have any explanation than come here to argue. otherwise im not interested in you.

do you understand that ? and im not interested in your hypocrisy of bathing like elephant and than again as soon as bath is finished again put sand on yourself. thus such bathing has no value at all.

nor i have interest in you. because you cannot give me anything rational explanation without using holy books quotes, faith or belief and personal experience.
Click to expand...


You could have just written "I'm an ignorant bigot" and saved yourself the time typing all that rubbish.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
anning said:
is that in schools they taught you only this much that use our links, videos, and name of the schools ? because that is greater knowledge ? instead of rubbish dry talking.

is that they all made you only spoon feed ? huh? is that you are not competent to explain anything what you have learned ? because didnt demonstrated your hypothesis. just boasted some rubbish nonsense.

which i dont think would have any effects on you, because british common wealth also touch every field of activities like giving jobs, dressing, trading, economgy, military, laws and justice, politics etc everything is touched by them so i dont think taht brainwashed sheeps like you would have any sense of reality.

i have brought ? you brought nothing yet. its only me who has explained everything so far now.
Click to expand...


Of course, this is anning once again ignoring people providing the kind of evidence he pretends doesn't exist.

Putting your fingers in your ears and shouting LA LA LA is, apparently, robust and substantive discussion in anning's mind.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
17 pages of thread and still not even a hint of any 'practical explanation'.

Then again, given that anning's been doing this shit for 10 years and STILL has nothing to show for it, it's hardly surprising.
 
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
Sparhafoc said:
17 pages of thread and still not even a hint of any 'practical explanation'.

Then again, given that anning's been doing this shit for 10 years and STILL has nothing to show for it, it's hardly surprising.
Click to expand...

i made progress at the first page under the title and supplied what i claimed to. but its you who is running here and there and wasted bandwidth of this forum.

NOW JUST MAKE IT CLEAR THAT YOU WILL GET BY MAKING THESE NONSENSE POSTS ? HUH?
 
Last edited:
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
anning said:
i made progress at the first page under the title and supplied what i claimed to.
Click to expand...

Bullshit.

In all the time you've been doing this, you've never offered ANY explanation at all - just incoherent garbled wittering.


anning said:
but its you who is running here and there and wasted bandwidth of this forum.
Click to expand...

Pop your head out of your rectum and take a look at the real world - you're the guy spamming obsessively all over the internet. And the entitlement is amusing as well - you came here to spam mindless bullshit and abuse people, but you're so concerned about what I'm posting and whether it's affecting the forum? Pull the other one anning, no one's going to buy into your concern troll narrative.


anning said:
NOW JUST MAKE IT CLEAR THAT YOU WILL GET BY MAKING THESE NONSENSE POSTS ? HUH?
Click to expand...

I'll answer that right after you explain your manic obsessive lunacy over the last 10 years, you deranged fruit loop.
 
arg-fallbackName="*SD*"/>
Ok, let's poll the room here, should this thread continue? It seems kinda pointless to me, but let's see what others think. If you think it's time to lock and preserve this as a spectacle to behold, just give a like on this post. If you think it should continue, quote this post and provide your reasoning. I don't want to just lock it without seeing what the regulars think.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
If you mean whether we could expect there to be any change at all in anning's posting, then no - the preponderance of evidence shows that this is all anning will ever do, it's not motivated by honest discussion, but the drive to be abusive and bigoted against people. Years and years of this behavior indicates to me that there's very little reason to be optimistic for change, and this thread provides yet more ample exemplification of that with racist abuse and incoherent anger directed at people without even an attempt at justification.

But on the other hand, I couldn't care less whether the thread's locked or not. It's the Gnat and the Bull. The thread has no purpose at all just ignorant self-defeating prejudice transparently masquerading, so whether it stays or goes won't make the blindest bit of difference to me. Up to you guys as to what kind of discussions you would like to see here.
 
arg-fallbackName="*SD*"/>
Well, it's just that at 17 pages and counting, with no change likely....
I think lines have to be drawn somewhere. It won't prevent him starting new threads, he'll be free to do that (tentatively). But we can wait to see how the vote turns out, happy to pay attention to the outcome.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
anning said:
than why we dress like you ? why we have same constitution which british government left for us ?
Click to expand...

My god, talk about ignorance.

en.wikipedia.org

Constitution of India - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

The Constitution of India (IAST: Bhāratīya Saṃvidhāna) is the supreme law of India.[3][4] The document lays down the framework that demarcates fundamental political code, structure, procedures, powers, and duties of government institutions and sets out fundamental rights, directive principles, and the duties of citizens. It is the longest written constitution of any country on Earth.

It imparts constitutional supremacy (not parliamentary supremacy, since it was created by a constituent assembly rather than Parliament) and was adopted by its people with a declaration in its preamble.[8] Parliament cannot override the constitution.

It was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 26 November 1949 and became effective on 26 January 1950.[9] The constitution replaced the Government of India Act 1935 as the country's fundamental governing document, and the Dominion of India became the Republic of India. To ensure constitutional autochthony, its framers repealed prior acts of the British parliament in Article 395.[10] India celebrates its constitution on 26 January as Republic Day.[11]
Click to expand...

So, the constitution was not created by the British, in fact the UK doesn't have a formal codified constitution at all. Rather, it was created *after* India's independence by Indians for Indians.

One of independent India's first acts was to repeal prior acts of British parliament.

Completely opposite to the UK, India has constitutional supremacy, whereas the UK parliament enjoys supreme legal authority able to create or end any law which the courts system is generally unable to interfere with.

It's like you're trying to make sure it's clear you don't have a fucking clue about anything at all; perhaps consistency is important to you?

And the idea that all Indians or all British people dress alike is monstrously ignorant; outright stupid in fact. I've traveled all over India and the UK, and both nations enjoy great diversity of culture, nothing like the homogeneity you pretend exists.

The real question is how to hold a discussion with someone who has no grasp of reality?
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Gretings,

anning said:
than dont waste my time and explain it how ? how one room or speices turns into another room or speices ? huh? because monkeys, apes and humans are all existing right now at once.

so just demonstrate your hypothesis, and just dont speak after observing anything and everything. just demonstrate your hypothesis.
_______________________
Click to expand...
You keep repeating this, even though I've explained to you several times since pages 6/7 that species don't turn into other species, they give rise to other species.

"Turns into" (में बदल जाता है) is not the same as "gives rise to" (को जन्म देता है).

Does that make sense? (Unlike my father, I don't speak Hindi.)

Either:
1) you haven't read what I wrote;
2) you haven't understood what I wrote;
3) you reject what I wrote.

If the latter, it's because you are so stuck in your belief-system that nothing I or anyone says or writes can get through to you.

You claim never to have seen a scientific explanation of evolution.

Wherever in India you live, you should be able to go to your local library, and find resources on it. Equally, visit a natural history museum, and you'll find all the physical evidence you could want.

anning said:
your pseudo DNA fallacy is finished with entire hand or legs transplant. so just do tell me how do we recognize our real father as well. or you dont know it yet ? in spite of being so advance ? than what is the value of such advancement ? if you dont know yet how to recognize even real father ?

just do answer to me from point to point without making much fuss. and finish the business.
Click to expand...
Believing something is not the same as knowing something.

Without a DNA test you can't know who are your real parents.

Transplants don't disprove DNA tests. as I - and others - have pointed out to you, with evidence.

Kindest regards,

James
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Greetings,

anning said:
is that in schools they taught you only this much that use our links, videos, and name of the schools ? because that is greater knowledge ? instead of rubbish dry talking.

is that they all made you only spoon feed ? huh? is that you are not competent to explain anything what you have learned ? because didnt demonstrated your hypothesis. just boasted some rubbish nonsense.

which i dont think would have any effects on you, because british common wealth also touch every field of activities like giving jobs, dressing, trading, economgy, military, laws and justice, politics etc everything is touched by them so i dont think taht brainwashed sheeps like you would have any sense of reality.
Click to expand...
I've had a Western education.

And?

Your animosity towards the British, if not the West, doesn't change the fact that evolution is true, and the theory is true. We have the evidence for both. Your unwillingness/inability to accept that does not make it false.

anning said:
i have brought ? you brought nothing yet. its only me who has explained everything so far now.
Click to expand...
Your explanation is nothing more than your belief that:

1) Krishna exists (you've admitted you have no proof of this);
2) Krishna created everything (since you can't prove his existence, this claim is dead in the water);
3) Your guru is Krishna's one true representative (again, since you can't prove Krishna's existence, this claim is also dead in the water);
4) Souls exist (prove it);
5) Reincarnation occurs (prove it - if you can't prove that souls exist, then this claim is also dead in the water).

Your "practical explanation" is nothing more than your belief.

You have no evidence for any of your claims.

Kindest regards,

James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top