Let's not, shall we? :lol:DRMProd said:Let's talk about Zeitgeist, shall we?
DRMProd said:Oh, and about the third part, money is not debt.
"This time"?PsycoDad said:Educated talk, really.
Of course only CT nutters come up and state that money creation is based on debt.
Of course it,´s all imagined and central banks don,´t sell treasury,´s to private corporations to raise capital for governments.
Perhaps some more insight is required for raising eyebrows and disqualifying other opinions as absurd idiocy.
I especially refer to improbable Joe who seems so worldly-wise to refute the process of money creation. I,´m looking foreward to a fruitful discussion so mere ad hominems won,´t do this time.
What your talking about here is shrinking the money supply, not expanding it.PsycoDad said:Of course only CT nutters come up and state that money creation is based on debt.
Of course it,´s all imagined and central banks don,´t sell treasury,´s to private corporations to raise capital for governments.
DRMProd said:Let's talk about Zeitgeist, shall we?
I think that this "documentary" its just a bunch of conspiracy theories tied up in a nice way.
But I want to talk specifically about the first part, the one that deals with religion...
What do you think about it?
How about you forget that you have any idea about how to spell, or the meanings of the words you use? Try whatever our native language is, instead of misspelled English, and misplaced Latin?PsycoDad said:Forget about tring to contruct a national money supply and a closed ceteris paribus enviroment.
DRMProd said:Oh, of course it's interesting, I give it at least that. But it has so many errors... It makes you wonder, are they just stupid or are they lying to prove their point? It sounds a bit like the creationists to me....
Oh, and about the third part, money is not debt.
MachineSp1rit said:who made the film and who why do they need the 9/11 lies?
IamtheVOICE123 said:Are you kidding me? Then what is with the Federal Reserve loaning money to the government at Interest (this has been explained by politics, economists and even former employees at the Federal Reserve. It never stated that money in and of itself is debt, but our current form of money which has to do with the reserve banking practice is a money form of debt.
I want to know an explanation of what you state.