• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Winston the Atheist

nice

New Member
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Colin is an old man with a lot of wisdom.

He works at a secret research building, part of which is completely
sealed. The sealed portion includes a greenhouse where they grow the food.

The same biomass is continually reused, going from carbon dioxide
in the air, to the food plants which take the carbon during photosynthesis,
to the test subject who is
the only person in the sealed portion of the building.

The test subject is a young man named Winston,
who was cloned and brought up in the building,
never having been outside.

He eats only plants grown there, completing the
carbon cycle as he exhales carbon dioxide for reuse.

The exact number of previous test subjects is classified,
but we know there was at least one other subject
who passed away about the time Winston was cloned.

Their supercomputer is so advanced that it is capable of designing
DNA which is then synthesized in the lab by automated equipment,
then implanted into a cell.

This cell is then made into a clone by a process similar to
in vitro fertilization. Differences include the use of
artificial blood, and they grow the fetus in the lab,
so he is made, not born.

Every time they clone a new fetus, they try to make improvements,
so it is never the same DNA.

As an atheist, Winston knew that he became self aware
because of some natural process.

He also knew that when people pass away,
their atoms get recycled by nature and
are reused to make new people.

Winston knows many of his atoms will be in a person
in the future, but it will be a different person.

Winston told Colin that he doesn't care about this new person,
even though it's his atoms becoming alive again,
because "its not me anymore".

Colin asked Winston, what if your tooth hurts,
and on the way out to the dentist you get hit by a car,
hit your head, and develop amnesia.

You have lost your memory and personal identity, but the
tooth pain is still there.

Are you telling me that you won't care about the
tooth pain because you can't remember your name?
Personal identity is great, but not that great.

That amnesia example is the same as your atoms being recycled
in the future to make a new person, because its your
atoms being alive, experiencing pain/pleasure, yet without
the original personal identity/memories.


You have to think four dimensionally, because you
are right that you don't care now, but later you
will change your mind (literally).


Chapter 2:
winston@endworldsuffering.org

He said look at it this way,
your tooth hurts.

Now imagine you are blind, but the tooth still hurts.
Let's say you are deaf too, but the tooth still hurts.
Take away personal identity, memories.

Keep going until the only thing left is the pain,
that appears to be a basic property of matter resulting from certain conditions.
The lowest level of pleasure could be another property.

That pain is the same regardless of what century it is.

Your atoms, your pain.

It can be the "old you" the first time the atoms are alive,
or the new you, when the recycled atoms become alive in
the new person,
but it's still your atoms, your pain.

Your biomass could be used to make two people, each weighs half as much
as you do. Yet when both people get a bad tooth, the pain feels the same.

So it makes little difference how the atoms are arranged,
they can be in a male or female person, some atoms can
be swapped with others;
pain and pleasure are apparently
intrinsic properties of matter under certain conditions.

As the matter is recycled, pain/pleasure goes with it.

We already know matter has some properties like mass, why can't it
have other properties?


Chapter 3:

Winston said, I still don't care about the "new me".

Colin told Winston "that's what you said last time".
Well, the "old you" anyway.

The last time your atoms were alive, that was the old you,
and you said that you wouldn't care because its
not you without your personal identity.

And now here you are, with your new personal identity,
not caring about the last "you".

Winston was intrigued as Colin showed a video of
Winstons atoms in their previous body.
They watched in silence as the earlier body said
the same things.


Chapter 4:

Winston said I still don't feel it's going to be me
in the future unless my exact pattern is duplicated.

Colin replied that your pattern changes all the time.
Every time you learn something, the brain pattern changes to
store the memory.
But you still have the feeling of being alive because
it's your atoms that are alive, that's the key.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Chapter 5:

Winston said, I still don't care about the "new me".

Colin said, right, but when you "are" the new you, then
you won't care about the old you.

It's still your atoms and "your" pain/pleasure, even though
you get a new name each time, and sometimes a new gender.

It's true that your personal identity is lost, but
you won't care about it when
your biomass gets a new personal identity.

Pain/pleasure are a constant, and the new you
will have those again, even when you aren't yourself anymore.

So when this place gets shut down, and your atoms are used to
make starving people in the future, that pain is yours.

Right now you may not care, but later while you
are starving, believe me, you will care.


Even if half or less of your atoms are in the new person,
its still your atoms experiencing the pain of starvation.

And the new people will be a blend of your atoms
and other peoples atoms.
We literally are all in this together.

It's very important that we team up and fix the global economy
so no child starves ever again.
This is something most of us want to do anyway, for the future
generations, regardless of atoms and all that.

There is a practical plan to fix everything so there
is never any unnecessary suffering,
and we don't miss out on any pleasure.

The plan is good but it needs your help to get it started.
We are at a critical point in time, where your help could
tip the scales in favour of success.


Chapter 6:

Some people speculate that we are a computer program
and the body doesn't really exist, or other possibilities,
but there is no scientific proof of that.

All the scientific evidence we have today, indicates that
we are made of atoms which are made of still smaller parts.

Barring any new discoveries, it looks like
the atoms could be the source of the basic properties of
pain and pleasure, because there
is nothing in between the atoms but empty space.

It's like asking how much dirt is there in a hole.
There isn't any, the hole is empty.


Chapter 7:

Some astronomers say there are so many stars out there that
there is likely another planet with an exact duplicate of you
right now.
But that's not you because it's not your atoms.
That's like our twins.


Chapter 8:

Astronomers have observed the universe is expanding,
giving rise to speculation it could end in heat death.

However they are also making new discoveries all the time.

What if they discover there is mass or dark matter
or something else, so far away that we can't see it yet,
because the light from it hasn't had time to get here yet?

That mass could be the source of gravity causing our
universe to expand. Why else would it be expanding?

This gives rise to the prospect of oscillations, meaning
our mass could be coming back, over and over again,
for infinity.

It's just like the theory of multiple big bangs.

In short, there is absolutely no proof the universe will
end, ever. It exists, we know that; and with no proof it will end,
we must plan for the worst case scenario.

There is a very realistic scenario in which our matter
will continue forever, in which case eventually, by random
luck, the atoms will eventually be recycled into the
same pattern we are in right now.
So that's us, living a theoretically infinite number
of lives; and we are not conscious of the delay
in between.
It's like we pass away, then wake up again as if no time
has passed.

There is a lot more important information that must not
be overlooked, so don't take this ball and run with it.
See the getting started guide at
the improved and updated website:
http://www.endworldsuffering.org

winston@endworldsuffering.org
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
I need to clarify my assertion.

We know our atoms came together in our bodies and became self aware,
with the ability to feel pain.

We know our atoms will be recycled by nature to make new bodies,
which will again be aware and have the ability to feel pain.

My assertion is that this process resembles amnesia, because it is our atoms, feeling pain,
yet without memories.

Maybe it's not exactly the same as amnesia,
but it is very similar in that it's our atoms, thus it is our awareness.

Yes our atoms get mixed up with other peoples atoms, but this process
happens every day anyway as we eat new atoms and exhale carbon dioxide.

All atoms have the ability to be part of life, under the right conditions
(hair atoms don't have much feeling, but nerve cells soaked in endorphins do).

Some say life "emerges" from complexity. So what? The atoms become complex
in the future and "emerge" again, whats the point?

Life does not end at death, it merely starts a new life again after mixing
with some other lives. The question is "is it us anymore", to which some
will say "it's not me anymore without my memories".

But it's still my atoms, becoming alive again, so I will still feel pain
even if I can't remember the last time I felt pain.

I consider this to the the "new me".
Yes you could say it's not the "old me" anymore, I agree with you on that,
but do you see how it could be considered "the new me"?

Or maybe "the new us" like the character Tuvix on Star Trek Voyager, when two
people were merged by the transporter malfunction.

That is not the best example because their memories were preserved,
and other differences,
but I bring it up to discuss the concept of lives merging.
 
arg-fallbackName="australopithecus"/>
I've heard this very dame nonsense somewhere before and I cannot for the life of me remember where. Perhaps my atoms are a little amnesic today.

Protip: They're not.

Never mind, I remember: http://www.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?t=8937
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
What is your opinion of gene therapy?

In most gene therapy studies, a "normal" gene is inserted into
the genome to replace an "abnormal," disease-causing gene.

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/medicine/genetherapy.shtml#work

So when they change a persons DNA,
to what degree is that still the same person?

Some of these altered genes cause physical changes to the brain.
In particular deleting the Nf1 gene improves neurogenesis, and the
new brain cells integrate into the brain's synapses.

http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/newsroom/news-releases/year-2012/march/neurogenesis-parada-mar8.html

How much DNA can they alter before it is no longer the same person?
 
arg-fallbackName="Frenger"/>
It seems (the OP) to be a fairly nice sentiment intertwined with utter nonsense.

I like that we're all in this together and we should think of future people, I like the Chinese proverb "A society grows great when old men plant trees in which their shade they know they shall never sit in".

But I don't see why we can't build a nice society without thinking our atoms carry the memory of ourselves and our pain.

Our atoms don't work like that. It's like Karl Pilkington arguing he wouldn't give his donate his eyes because he's worried whoever gets them will look at things he doesn't want to.
 
arg-fallbackName="Frenger"/>
nice said:
What is your opinion of gene therapy?

In most gene therapy studies, a "normal" gene is inserted into
the genome to replace an "abnormal," disease-causing gene.

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/medicine/genetherapy.shtml#work

So when they change a persons DNA,
to what degree is that still the same person?

Some of these altered genes cause physical changes to the brain.
In particular deleting the Nf1 gene improves neurogenesis, and the
new brain cells integrate into the brain's synapses.

http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/newsroom/news-releases/year-2012/march/neurogenesis-parada-mar8.html

How much DNA can they alter before it is no longer the same person?

I don't think the problem is that people can have personality changes through amnesia and we generally consider the personality to be that person, the problem comes when you assert that atoms moving from one person to the next some how carry a memory of that person.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
I don't think atoms hold any memory of the previous person,
but the atoms do have the property of feeling pain and pleasure
under some conditions.

There is an important difference between memory and pain.

If I have a toothache, then develop amnesia but the tooth still hurts,
that's what I am talking about, the pain without any memory of my name or
where I am from.

When my atoms are in some future person, they will not remember me,
but it's still my atoms feeling pain, so is it really that much
different than when I feel pain and have amnesia now?

Sure the DNA will be different in the future person, but as that link I shared
earlier says, I could change my DNA right now.
But I will still feel pain and not like it. So I think DNA is irrelevant.

It's still my atoms feeling pain, regardless of how the atoms are arranged.

If I made an electric car from lego bricks and other parts, then took
it apart and mixed them all up, then put it back together again,
is it still my car?

I fail to see the significance of how the parts are arranged,
it's still the same parts doing the same basic thing.

If I take my car engine apart and mix up pistons 2 and 3, and
many other parts, then put it back together again, is it still my engine?

Same with atoms in the body, taken apart and making a new body.
The new body will not remember the old body,
but it's the same atoms feeling the same pain.
 
arg-fallbackName="Frenger"/>
nice said:
I don't think atoms hold any memory of the previous person,
but the atoms do have the property of feeling pain and pleasure
under some conditions.

Citations please, because as far as I understand it, atoms feel or remember absolutely nothing.
There is an important difference between memory and pain.

Yes, that's fine, but you insinuate that pain can be carried as memory through atoms.
If I have a toothache, then develop amnesia but the tooth still hurts,
that's what I am talking about, the pain without any memory of my name or
where I am from.

Ok, but pain isn't carried by memory, it's carried from pain receptors through nerves to the brain.
When my atoms are in some future person, they will not remember me,
but it's still my atoms feeling pain, so is it really that much
different than when I feel pain and have amnesia now?

It is very different from having amnesia and still feeling pain, pain is not sent as memory, you don't remember you had pain so you should still have it, it is a mechanism for telling your brain there is damage. What you are saying makes no sense.
Sure the DNA will be different in the future person, but as that link I shared
earlier says, I could change my DNA right now.
But I will still feel pain and not like it. So I think DNA is irrelevant.

I'm beginning to think you are a maniac, sorry, but you are just not making any sense any more.
It's still my atoms feeling pain, regardless of how the atoms are arranged.

ATOMS DON'T FEEL PAIN!!!!!!!
If I made an electric car from lego bricks and other parts, then took
it apart and mixed them all up, then put it back together again,
is it still my car?

It depends how you put them back together, if you arranged them as a car then yes, it's still your car, if you don't, then no.
I fail to see the significance of how the parts are arranged,
it's still the same parts doing the same basic thing.

Not necessarily, ask any chemist.
If I take my car engine apart and mix up pistons 2 and 3, and
many other parts, then put it back together again, is it still my engine?

Ownership has nothing to do with anything. it's still your engine with parts moved about.
Same with atoms in the body, taken apart and making a new body.
The new body will not remember the old body,
but it's the same atoms feeling the same pain.

The problem is you still think atoms feel pain, they don't, at all. They could be parts of pain receptors in which case they send messages to the brain indicating damage on the body or whatever. If the atoms in the pain receptors decompose then they will no longer be pain receptors but the separate atoms which once made up the pain receptors.

Do you see what I'm getting at? The pain receptors are made up of atoms, they don't "enter new bodies" or whatever as working pain receptors or anything like that. Atoms have no memory, atoms feel no pain, what you are saying is nonsense.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Frenger said:
Do you see what I'm getting at? The pain receptors are made up of atoms, they don't "enter new bodies" or whatever as working pain receptors or anything like that.

Maybe our misunderstanding is about whether individual atoms feel pain,
or is pain only felt as part of pain receptors or brain cells.

The answer is that it doesn't really matter what an individual atom does,
because all or most atoms will become part of pain receptors and brain cells
once again, over and over again.

They may not enter the new body as receptors, but they do become part of
receptors and brain cells, that is what matters.
Those are our atoms, feeling pain again.

I may not remember my atoms being in a caveman, but they still feel pain anyway.

And they always will. As a group that is, the group of atoms in my brain cells.
 
arg-fallbackName="Frenger"/>
nice said:
Frenger said:
Do you see what I'm getting at? The pain receptors are made up of atoms, they don't "enter new bodies" or whatever as working pain receptors or anything like that.

Maybe our misunderstanding is about whether individual atoms feel pain,
or is pain only felt as part of pain receptors or brain cells.

The answer is that it doesn't really matter what an individual atom does,
because all or most atoms will become part of pain receptors and brain cells
once again, over and over again.

They may not enter the new body as receptors, but they do become part of
receptors and brain cells, that is what matters.
Those are our atoms, feeling pain again.

I may not remember my atoms being in a caveman, but they still feel pain anyway.

And they always will. As a group that is, the group of atoms in my brain cells.

Pain is collection of things, we make sense of signals sent through our nervous system into our brains via the pain receptors. The pain receptors send signals when they are alerted to a "problem" for want of a better word. The pain receptors feel nothing.

What you are saying really doesn't make any sense at all, as much as I like the sentiment and the poetic nature, it lacks any real meaning I'm afraid.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Frenger said:
Pain is collection of things, we make sense of signals sent through our nervous system into our brains via the

But pain does exist. We agree on that, right?

When my body dies, it will not disappear. It is recycled and becomes
a new body that continues to feel pain.

Memories are lost; pain continues.

Do you see what I am getting at? Death is not the end,
just a transition where everything except memories
continues to happen.

I will still have the feelings of pain, pleasure, of being alive,
I just won't remember having had those same properties before.

I may have some differences in my DNA in the future body,
but the majority of everybodys DNA is the same anyway,
only a small number of genes make us different from each other.

Interestingly:
Neanderthal DNA sequences were found to be about 99.5% similar
to the modern human genome, indicating that modern humans
and Neanderthals had a common ancestor about 700,000 years ago.

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/humanmigration.shtml
 
arg-fallbackName="australopithecus"/>
nice said:
When my body dies, it will not disappear. It is recycled and becomes
a new body that continues to feel pain.

You can repeat it as often as you want, it doesn't make it more true. You're asserting nothing but your own misunderstanding of quantum theory, in two threads on the same nonesense. Be a man and take it on the chin instead of repeating your misunderstanding.

We get what you're saying, it's just that you're wrong is all.
 
Back
Top