What goalposts?Sparhafoc said:Them goalposts.
Why not, if God is the highest authority in the world?Sparhafoc said:Can God make homosexual sex a virtue?
In the middle ages, priests, in particular, thought that adultery was very evil and that those who consented would go to hell for it. The didn't believe that any flesh-and-blood beings decided it was evil, they thought it was evil because God said so, people's feelings about it being unimportant.Sparhafoc said:Yes, according to theists, and irrelevant anyway.
Just because they change their beliefs doesn't mean they believe the order itself has changed.Sparhafoc said:They changed beliefs, so logically the 'superhuman order' you posit they believe in fundamentally, has itself been changed. Your refusals are completely illogical.
Okay, so object A exerting a force on object B means that object B exerts and equal and opposite force on object A. This is beyond debate until an observation falsifies it. In science, 'laws of physics' doesn't mean our current understanding of them but all actual laws, even undiscovered ones, these are indeed unchangeable.Sparhafoc said:Secondly, you've already been educated as to what physical laws are, so of course they change having been made up by humans in the first place based on their observations of natural forces. Laws can readily be modified as I've already shown you in this very thread.
In the end, I'm not saying that political ideologies are religions, just that there may be good reasons to count them as such.Sparhafoc said:As you've tried to explain from within the paradigm you've postulated, only the paradigm appears to clash with several facts and you seem unwilling to engage in those facts, attempting to brush them aside by repeating your assertions which have already been shown wrong.
No, I have actually read some comparisons between the two.Sparhafoc said:Did your mate Dave say that down the pub?