)O( Hytegia )O(
New Member
Re: Walter Remine: Paper analysis.
*rubs head*
I thought I left behind whiny ravings when I left high school and deleted all the preteen drama whores off my Facebook. :facepalm:
Once again, I stand by my basic posit of the problems presented in this paper. The paper itself claims for an absolute certainty in rate and never assigns random probability of results.
I mean, fuck, you can't even do that in Chemistry. You can barely do that in Physics! - You sure as hell can't do that with Biological organisms living in a competitive environment where, over time, change (change = compiled mutation over generations) occurs on small scales to show benefit for the species or death for that brand of species.
It assumes Set growth, Set Death, and Set change - none of those in any biological science is ever stated as a constant.
*rubs head*
I thought I left behind whiny ravings when I left high school and deleted all the preteen drama whores off my Facebook. :facepalm:
Once again, I stand by my basic posit of the problems presented in this paper. The paper itself claims for an absolute certainty in rate and never assigns random probability of results.
I mean, fuck, you can't even do that in Chemistry. You can barely do that in Physics! - You sure as hell can't do that with Biological organisms living in a competitive environment where, over time, change (change = compiled mutation over generations) occurs on small scales to show benefit for the species or death for that brand of species.
It assumes Set growth, Set Death, and Set change - none of those in any biological science is ever stated as a constant.