Vortex based math

[australopithecus]

Historically, anyone who decides their IQ is relevant to any discussion outside of "What is your IQ?", is bringing a knife to a gunfight. Your IQ is not important, it doesn't matter, no one cares.

MGK previously addressed and elaborated on his criticisms on page one. Guess a high IQ allows one to guess at what has been posted in threads without having to read them.

MGK post:

Show More Hide

{TEXT}

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

So I hear you say you are an expert and so YOU can understand why this is "bunk", but you cannot possibly explain it to me. While I have no training in electronics, I have a good deal of math education and a high IQ. You reply is merely puffing up your ego, you make no attempt to prove the MATH wrong. If you can prove the MATH is wrong, please do so. Otherwise, I will take it that you cannot disprove the theory.

It is funny that you mention my reply as "merely puffing up my ego" when it has absolutely no reference to me whatsoever. What I might suggest in the future is that you simply state that you didn't like the answer, because that more accurately reflects the case.

And I find it quite funny that you say that you have a good deal of math education, however I find that quite a laughable claim given that you think that this has any merit or that it is even math. I would even go as far as to say that your mathematical education is lower to what you would get in high school (which I have always stated that they don't even teach you proper math there). How far am I?
Because I would expect that someone who has come into contact with math would be able to recognize that there is as much math in this "vortex math" as the following picture sounds like Beethoven's Symphony No 9.

Show More Hide

{TEXT}

And certainly it is not my job to prove that they are wrong, prove that you are right!

But ok"¦ I will tell you what, I will give you an opportunity to put that math education to practice.
You pick a concept from this "vortex math" that you are more comfortable with, that you feel you understand better, and if you are successfully able to explain it, I will tell you what is wrong with it. How about that?

 

[Gobswib304]

I'm not sure if you any of you "Experts" who are clearly unable to think outside of the box have seen the work done by Daniel Nunez . He has successfully invented ABHA Rodin coils that utilize the energy that surrounds us. Oh and guess who introduced him to such concepts....those "crackpots" Rodin and Randy Powell. I find it absolutely hilarious that most on this thread have taken NOTHING but a NEGATIVE approach to the concept of vortex math. You "Experts" keep on thinking you're right with your closed little minds. You're basically the same people that would have argued the Earth was flat centuries ago as that was common knowledge. Do yourselves a favor and wake up! Go to YouTube and search " Daniel Nunez Vortex Math" and then come talk to me. Also visit his website 1stopenergies.com and then come talk to me. For some "Experts" a lot of you, specifically Master_Ghost_Night, didn't say SHIT

 

[australopithecus]

Do yourselves a favor and wake up! Go to YouTube and search " Daniel Nunez Vortex Math" and then come talk to me.

You realise you've come here to talk to us, right? And by talk I mean to run your mouth on your opening post. But hey, feel free to believe everything you see on YouTube.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

I'm not sure if you any of you "Experts" who are clearly unable to think outside of the box have seen the work done by Daniel Nunez . He has successfully invented ABHA Rodin coils that utilize the energy that surrounds us. Oh and guess who introduced him to such concepts....those "crackpots" Rodin and Randy Powell. I find it absolutely hilarious that most on this thread have taken NOTHING but a NEGATIVE approach to the concept of vortex math. You "Experts" keep on thinking you're right with your closed little minds. You're basically the same people that would have argued the Earth was flat centuries ago as that was common knowledge. Do yourselves a favor and wake up! Go to YouTube and search " Daniel Nunez Vortex Math" and then come talk to me. Also visit his website 1stopenergies.com and then come talk to me. For some "Experts" a lot of you, specifically Master_Ghost_Night, didn't say SHIT

[sarcasm]Yes, because I clearly take my knowledge from youtube, and its not like I do this for a living.
When he wins the Nobel prize,[/sarcasm] let me know.

 

[Nemesiah]

Video 1



Video 2



About Daniel Nunez (Nuñez?) 's coils

I would love to check this guy's claims (from his videos, not recreating them) BUT from what I have seen, in his videos cables go offscreen (like in video 1) or uses known components that would do what his coil is supposed to be doing (like the capacitors from video 2) so, until I see a clear video that isn't shot in some dark little shack with the wires being clearly NOT going into some other equipment (like the amplifier from video 1) I'm calling bullshit.

This explains why increasing a circuit's resistance will increase the output voltage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm's_law

About vortex math... Numerology has this pesky habit of being rediscovered again and again, and used to find magical properties of stuff, being used to explain bible predictions, picking a horse on the track, etc... I'm not saying that it is impossible for magnetism to work diferently than what we know, but I dont think that making neat drawings witha a spirograph constitutes a new branch of untapped cosmological power.

From the guy's website
http://vortexmath.webs.com/

Marko Rodin has discovered the source of the non-decaying spin of the electron. Although scientists know that all electrons in the universe spin, they have never discovered the source of this spin. Rodin has. He has discovered the underpinning geometry of the universe, the fabric of time itself. He has done this by reducing all higher mathematics – calculus, geometry, scalar math – to discrete-number mathematics.

Fucking hell yes! finally, about time someone dealt with the scientific fatcats back in washington.

Here we can see a lot of fun stuff to do with numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology

Scientific theories are sometimes labeled "numerology" if their primary inspiration appears to be a set of patterns rather than scientific observations. This colloquial use of the term is quite common within the scientific community and it is mostly used to dismiss a theory as questionable science.

And now some common sense, I'm not saying that discoveries have to be made by large corporations, and I love a good underdog story but, Can we seriously take the claims of these people at face value? When no peer reviewed papers have been published?

For example in this video:



it is an iteresting magnetic experiment, that both needles point towards the center of the torus is interesting; however when we check the coments section:

DumitrescuValentin82 1 year ago
Prostul nu e prost destul pana nu e si fudul ....
Mestere ... Puterea corupe ...
If you consider that you are right, explain in detail the experiment and help others replicate the experiment in order to study its effects.
Otherwise .... please talk to the mirror if you like being mysterious.
Reply · 2

DAN PREDA 1 year ago
If you could think.... you do not need more explanations!
If you open your mouth....I WILL NEVER PLACE SOME....IN IT...!
....I PREFFER YOU USE ....YOUR HEAD!
...YOU NEVER USE THIS POWER....IF YOU DO NOT USE YOUR HEAD!
All informations are not transferable between heads!
You must put 50% intelligence near 50% of mine, and after that YOU WILL OBTAIN THE POWER!
This UNCONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY ...CANT BE STOLEN!
Only 50%...can be transferable, put the REST and will see.

So... no peer review, no progress.