• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

The stupidest thing a creatonist has ever said to you

arg-fallbackName="lordlandraid"/>
kobidobidog said:
The devil is in a, body that dies. You die. You have a soul. Not be safe to life in heaven peaceably with all men, and have a devil in your soul. They will do bad to humans . Humans take what God made ,and kill it that's all, and humans make things that are non living. The devil is not in anything that man makes, but he can be in the human soul. Take your drugs. I will use my U,C,S, to help me keep my Spine healthy, as a result my whole body healthy.
.... By the way... the guy also thinks science 'is of the devil,' and that going to the chiropractor is better than getting a much needed vaccine... I've already lost all patience with this person...

He also tends to have a hobby of writing the most unintelligible dribble I have ever had the discourtesy of trying to understand..................
He is giving me diabetes...
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
In fairness to our furry friend, there is (or at least used to be) a strong school of biblical interpretation which taught that Adam thoroughly tested out each of the animals as potential companions before God decided to make Eve.

Try reading Genesis 2:20 again in that light. ;)
 
arg-fallbackName="Duvelthehobbit666"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
In fairness to our furry friend, there is (or at least used to be) a strong school of biblical interpretation which taught that Adam thoroughly tested out each of the animals as potential companions before God decided to make Eve.

Try reading Genesis 2:20 again in that light. ;)
DAMN YOU!!!
 
arg-fallbackName="Thomas Doubting"/>
sure! if your chiropractic also offers vaccination, fluid therapy and ventilator assistence
and of course wound care and infection control... but in that case, i am 100% behind that statement.
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
It wasn't said to me, but I just read this in a creationist book my mother lent to me:
Quite clearly, if the speed of light was very much higher in the past then it could travel these vast distances in a very short period of time

images
 
arg-fallbackName="Thomas Doubting"/>
Laurens said:
It wasn't said to me, but I just read this in a creationist book my mother lent to me:
Quite clearly, if the speed of light was very much higher in the past then it could travel these vast distances in a very short period of time

images

doesn't make much sense to me.. why not just say "god put the light there instantly"
beat that stupid science!!
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
Thomas Doubting said:
doesn't make much sense to me.. why not just say "god put the light there instantly"
beat that stupid science!!

Because if you're going to deny all of the Biological sciences, plus Geology you might as well deny Physics too.

Why do things in half measures?
 
arg-fallbackName="Thomas Doubting"/>
Laurens said:
Thomas Doubting said:
doesn't make much sense to me.. why not just say "god put the light there instantly"
beat that stupid science!!

Because if you're going to deny all of the Biological sciences, plus Geology you might as well deny Physics too.

Why do things in half measures?

I could say it is a theist's strong point to cherry pick and interpret what one can live with the best.. but actually even better would be to keep philosophy out of it as well. Lets just say we are too stupid to understand god's ways and stop thinking/talking about it altogether?

Jokes aside.. i did hear the theory that light might have had a boost at the early beginning of the universe.. something about the "increasing pace of time" and "light slowing down right after the bang" but i can't really make much of that without lots of math and leeching knowledge from scientific researches.. but however i turn it, i can't relate any of that to "the world is only few thousand years old and my imaginary attention seeking psychopath boss did it" without ignoring everything else and making the giant leap into the fictive.. where they usually get all their arguments..
 
arg-fallbackName="lordlandraid"/>
I got the best one ever. Wait for it... wait for it... aaannnnddd.... NOW!
kobidobidog said:
The creation literalist is not a Christian at all
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
 
arg-fallbackName="televator"/>
^^By that logic, 2+2=cheesecake

I don't know if this has been posted, but there's some gems in this one.


How can, like, an African-american person evolve from a white person? We're different skeeein.
 
arg-fallbackName="Inferno"/>
@televators vid:

I love how that guy says "Creationists like to be lumpers, they like to put a lot of organisms together in a group. Evolutionists like to be splitters, they like to set up a whole bunch of different organisms."
Errr, who's the one talking about magically differently created kinds that have no relation to one another? Oh yeah, the Evolutionists of course, they believe in magic. Right?

Sigh...
 
arg-fallbackName="televator"/>
Inferno said:
@televators vid:

I love how that guy says "Creationists like to be lumpers, they like to put a lot of organisms together in a group. Evolutionists like to be splitters, they like to set up a whole bunch of different organisms."
Errr, who's the one talking about magically differently created kinds that have no relation to one another? Oh yeah, the Evolutionists of course, they believe in magic. Right?

Sigh...

Yeah it would have been more accurate to describe the creationist method as one of "separation", and the method for evolution being a "branching" one. It can't take more than a minute to figure that out, but figuring stuff out doesn't seem to come easy to these folks... :lol:
 
arg-fallbackName="Lallapalalable"/>
When asked for sources on uncommon and erroneous claims:
Fundie McChristian said:
I dont need to do everyone else's research, do it yourself. It's out there, you just need to look and be able to distinguish the truth from the noise.

Somebody Else (discussing the watchmaker's fallacy) said:
If you found a watch burried in the middle of a rock, would you asume it 'evolved' from a rock?
 
arg-fallbackName="televator"/>
ThePuppyTurtle said:
Evolution cannot account for fractals. These shapes have existed since creation and cannot have evolved since numbers cannot be changed.
- Jason Lisle

My bowl of soup can't tell me the weather either. Aha! bowl of soup is wrong!
 
Back
Top