The Nature of Evidence

[abelcainsbrother]

Charles Darwin knew about variations in reproduction and he assumed macroevolution too as dogs were bread from wolves long before Charles Darwin came along.

You apparently haven't read The Origin of Species.

Charles Darwin never says dog breeding is evidence of macroevolution. He talks about the fossil record, biogeography, geology and comparative anatomy as evidence for macroevolution. Not fucking dog breeding.

Maybe you should actually read his fucking book before you start commenting on what it contains?

Here you go: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1228/1228-h/1228-h.htm

Tell me the difference between dog breeders and Darwin's finches.Nothing!

 

[abelcainsbrother]

Wow! First off.Stop with your lies evolution has always been about macroevolution,also stop acting like just because they can no longer breed they evolved,because there are many examples where they can still breed,so you cannot say that because they cannot breed they evolved.You both need to read "On the origin of Species" because evolution has always been about macroevolution and you cannot have evolution just having evidence for micro and that is all the evidence shows.If you deny this you are denying evidence you know about that only shows micro from viruses to bacteria,frogs,salamanders,fruit flies,etc you start out with one kind of life and still have the same kind of life at the end with no evolution going on.There is no evidence that demonstrates macro evolution.

They're not lies they're facts you deluded and galactically inept idiot. Get your meds, your magicman psychosis is making you drool uncontrollably all over the forum.

There is no advancement of discussion with you because you're barely literate and probably not even potty trained. Get help. From an adult.

I'm helping you believe it or not.You can't realize it, yet you believe life evolves despite what the evidence shows.I'm just pointing out all you have for evidence is either reproduction or adaptation as evidence.Do you know about the bacteria that adapted and thrives right in radiation and yet where is natural selection?How has the environment caused it to evolve? It will always be bacteria no matter where it adapts to live.

 

[Rumraket]

They're not lies they're facts you deluded and galactically inept idiot. Get your meds, your magicman psychosis is making you drool uncontrollably all over the forum.

There is no advancement of discussion with you because you're barely literate and probably not even potty trained. Get help. From an adult.

I'm helping you believe it or not.You can't realize it, yet you believe life evolves despite what the evidence shows.I'm just pointing out all you have for evidence is either reproduction or adaptation as evidence.Do you know about the bacteria that adapted and thrives right in radiation and yet where is natural selection?How has the environment caused it to evolve? It will always be bacteria no matter where it adapts to live.

 

[abelcainsbrother]

Don't worry.Theistic evolutionists cannot give me evidence life evolves either.You know I could become a theistic evolutionist but I don't because of a lack of scientific evidence.I gave them a chance to change my mind.

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

 

[abelcainsbrother]

I'm not spamming and I have my opinion for a very good reason.Besides iron sharpens iron,it is good to discuss these things and not all agree.

 

[SpecialFrog]

I'm not spamming and I have my opinion for a very good reason.Besides iron sharpens iron,it is good to discuss these things and not all agree.

You are posting the same information in a dozen different topics. That is called spamming.

Why not to stick to one thread and actually engage with what people are saying there?

 

[he_who_is_nobody]