Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do not get special treatment, you have to apply the same way everyone does.
This is ignorance, you will not learn anything in this way ( for example My channel has tens of Videos where I exposed the ignorance of youtube atheists, and I was amazed, why atheists continue to make the same mistakes again and again - now I know -). The beauty of YT lies in the interactions between different groups.I very rarely watch videos made by people I am not subscribed to on Youtube,
I run the BlogTV room, and contrary to your opinion that there was no reason, I banned you for trolling the chat. This has nothing to do with the broadcast; you can still appear on the broadcast even if you are banned from chat. If you behave as irresponsibly on the broadcast as you did in chat, you will likely just get kicked out. We don't have the time or patience to entertain relentless, obsessive trolls.
1. Some atheists have challenged me, I accept, and I contact youan official challenge is made through Skype
Stop crying censorship. You have been treated more than fairly given your record for trolling on Youtube.
AndromedasWake
TheFlyingBastard said:Every single post I read of the guy just makes him funnier and funnier. "Atheists say that only catholicism existed" :')
VyckRo said:TheFlyingBastard wrote:Every single post I read of the guy just makes him funnier and funnier. "Atheists say that only catholicism existed" :')
I speak of the Middle Ages, before Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli.
Yap Atheists believe that, is part of their faith. :lol: :lol:
Vyck said:And that is that I believe that every person which i spoke to, represents the same group ( since when theyounghistorian77, urged me to call, all this time I thought that I am talking to a single group ), but ...still ...It's hard for me to believe that you didn't know about this!
I can't decide if this is a sad confused human with a poor conception of the basic workings of linguistics** and the failure to realize that different arguments address different things***, or just a poe.VyckRo said:1 ( atheists exposed by me)
Thunderf00t
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he4VT1aPLRY
DprJones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak88G5uu9PA
ZOMGitsCriss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FjJ4GionQc
XstashiX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2UgXEozxCA
ProfMTH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2Mb9TBpLj0
:arrow: Unintentional proof of god...VyckRo said:I have nothing further to say on this topic!
**his entire video on thunderfoot is saying that TF is delusional to question whether or not witches exist. He does this by defining witch *not* as someone who uses rituals to control the supernatural, but as someone who uses rituals to *attempt* to control the supernatural. Which is a red herring anyway: TF is addressing the idea that witchcraft has any effect on reality, to so obviously define words differently so his video becomes unintelligible (and then make a video wondering why, under new definitions, the things thunderfoot says are silly) is intellectual dishonesty.
***he has a great fondness for saying the equivalence of "you said x but if we look at y, x doesn't apply therefore x is always wrong"
****Oh, and I almost forgot: he's one of those who thinks Dawkins really believes life on earth was intelligently designed by aliens. He doesn't, he suggested it as the most likely reality of intelligent design *if* intelligent design had any merit (which it doesn't); i.e. given the hypothetical that ID is true, is it more likely that an omniscient omnipotent benevolent intelligence (super complex thing) did it, or that evolution is still the source of life, and some aliens did it (and since aliens are vastly less complicated and unlikely, occham's razor says aliens). In reality, Dawkins does not think ID is at all true, and does not believe, as some either ignorant or actively dishonest creationists claim, that aliens started life on this earth.