MarsCydonia
New Member
I think many of us would love to at least have the opportunity.Elshamah said:feel free to ignore the science i posted......
Unfortunately, there's no actual science you posted to have had the opportunity to ignore it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think many of us would love to at least have the opportunity.Elshamah said:feel free to ignore the science i posted......
Grumpy Santa said:"Micromolecules do not spontaneously combine to form macromolecules."
" Many biological molecules are polymers: in this terminology, monomers are relatively small micromolecules that are linked together to create large macromolecules known as polymers."
Do you see it now?
Elshamah said:Grumpy Santa said:"Micromolecules do not spontaneously combine to form macromolecules."
" Many biological molecules are polymers: in this terminology, monomers are relatively small micromolecules that are linked together to create large macromolecules known as polymers."
Do you see it now?
no.
Grumpy Santa said:Do you see it now?
Elshamah said:Grumpy Santa said:Do you see it now?
no.
Elshamah said:go ahead and elucidate me.
hackenslash said:Elshamah said:go ahead and elucidate me.
Ooh, I'd like to light him up! Can I, pleeeeeaaaasssseeee?
Grumpy Santa said:Oy. You claim initially that monomers don't combine spontaneously to create polymers, then your definition states "monomers are relatively small micromolecules that are linked together to create large macromolecules known as polymers.". The only thing you're missing is a catalyst which does allow the polymerization to take place.
Dragan Glas said:Greetings,
Which neatly brings us back to the question I put to you on the previous page, Elshamah.
Kindest regards
James
Elshamah said:Dragan Glas said:Greetings,
Which neatly brings us back to the question I put to you on the previous page, Elshamah.
Kindest regards
James
which was ?
Kindest regards,Here's a question for you...
What's the smallest number of nucleotides needed to catalyze a cellular chemical reaction?
Dragan Glas said:What's the smallest number of nucleotides needed to catalyze a cellular chemical reaction?
Kindest regards,
James
Says you.Elshamah said:Abiogenesis is impossible
Since anything in Nature can only occur according to the laws of Nature, chemical reactions are not "unguided" or "random".Elshamah said:http://reasonandscience.heavenforum.org ... impossible
The origin of life was either due to:
a) unguided, random, aleatorial chemical reactions
This is a nonsense term since no-one - eg, Craig - has defined exactly what they mean by it.Elshamah said:b) physical necessity
Again, says you.Elshamah said:c) creation through a intelligent agency
Unguided coincidental chemical reactions have not the creative action to make the most detailed and concentrated organizational structure known to humanity.
Actually, the laws of Nature determine what can and can't happen - in other words, evolution as a process is already at work before abiogenesis occurs.Elshamah said:Chemical reactions and bonds can show bonding preference of one substrate to the other, but that does not explain the specific instructional arrangement of nucleotides.
Evolution is not a driving force prior to DNA replication.
Given that your various unevidenced claims are false, your conclusion is also false.Elshamah said:Intelligent design remains therefore the best explanation as causal agent of the origin of life.
Dragan Glas said:Greetings,
Says you.Elshamah said:Abiogenesis is impossible
Since anything in Nature can only occur according to the laws of Nature, chemical reactions are not "unguided" or "random".Elshamah said:http://reasonandscience.heavenforum.org ... impossible
The origin of life was either due to:
a) unguided, random, aleatorial chemical reactions
This is a nonsense term since no-one - eg, Craig - has defined exactly what they mean by it.Elshamah said:b) physical necessity
Again, says you.Elshamah said:c) creation through a intelligent agency
Unguided coincidental chemical reactions have not the creative action to make the most detailed and concentrated organizational structure known to humanity.
Actually, the laws of Nature determine what can and can't happen - in other words, evolution as a process is already at work before abiogenesis occurs.Elshamah said:Chemical reactions and bonds can show bonding preference of one substrate to the other, but that does not explain the specific instructional arrangement of nucleotides.
Evolution is not a driving force prior to DNA replication.
Given that your various unevidenced claims are false, your conclusion is also false.Elshamah said:Intelligent design remains therefore the best explanation as causal agent of the origin of life.
I won't bother with the rest of your spiel, other than to say it's equally poorly argued.
Kindest regards,
James