• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

THE BURDEN OF PROOF

arg-fallbackName="australopithecus"/>
Josephhasfun01 said:
Code:
    [quote=")O( Hytegia )O("][quote="Josephhasfun01"][quote=")O( Hytegia )O("]Joseph.
The burden of proof lay on your shoulders to prove that the Immaterial Unicorn of Pink is not God, since I have shown it clearly to be the name of the eternal, immaterial deity.[/quote]

If you know the immaterial to be a unicorn and also have knowledge of the color of the unicorn, I would say you have debunked your own claim of a pink unicorn existing as immaterial. Immaterial is not visable so how could you know that it's a unicorn and also give it's color?[/quote]

I didn't say that it [i]was[/i] Pink. I said that it was [i]of[/i] Pink.

The Unicorn spoke to me in a dream and stated that it was [i]of Pink[/i] since light is a mortal concept and not applicable to it's realm of thought, but it was the closest description it could give of it's status.[/quote]

Nice try. :lol: It was fun watching U scrambling and editing your previous posts. I already have the originals.

The irony. As just so you're not making a bigger arse of yourself, Hytegia hasn't edited his post. I checked.
 
arg-fallbackName="Darkprophet232"/>
Josephhasfun01 said:
Is this the part where we throw insults back and forth? I joined LOR for this? I might as well go listen to Jr. high students in the lunchroom.
highly disappointed

Says the person whose arguments have degenerated into:
Josephhasfun01 said:
Your starting to get it Austra! Good for you!

Josephhasfun01 said:
I don't have time to argue with posers.

Josephhasfun01 said:
congradulations to you. You must be so proud of your accoplishment!

Josephhasfun01 said:
the beauty of it is in the eye of the beholder
 
arg-fallbackName="Josephhasfun01"/>
australopithecus said:
Feel free to leave then. It's blindingly obvious to anyone with eyes that you came here for no other reason than to proselytise, via cack handed non-logic, and argumentum ex recto.

I am only in here to get a feel of the depth of the dogma going around. Apparently knee high boots are not sufficient. I should have put on my wadders. The crap is over waiste deep in here.
 
arg-fallbackName="Darkprophet232"/>
Josephhasfun01 said:
I am only in here to get a feel of the depth of the dogma going around. Apparently knee high boots are not sufficient. I should have put on my wadders. The crap is over waiste deep in here.

Are you gloating over the sum total your contributions to the forum? That's an odd way of doing it...
 
arg-fallbackName=")O( Hytegia )O("/>
Josephhasfun01 said:
Nice try. :lol: It was fun watching U scrambling and editing your previous posts. I already have the originals.

Liar liar pants on fire.

Pretty sure the Bible condemns liars as sinners who are in sore need of salvation.

By all means, please produce those "edits."
Or are those Immaterial too?

But, why bother? You've yet to show evidence that the Immaterial Unicorn of Pink is the deity that he is. Or, if you can't, simply confess your acceptance.

After all, I'm only using your own logic Joseph, which you used to prove that God existed not 4 pages ago. The Burden of Proof lay upon your shoulders to prove me wrong.
 
Back
Top