STOP NASA! SAVE THE MOON!

[Fartoholic]

looool

 

[ninja_lord666]

"There's something extremely valuable there." Yes, there is: Helium-3! It's not alien technology. :roll:

This is just too funny. We're launching an attack on the moon? :lol:

 

[Netheralian]

Where do they find these people? :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:

 

[DontHurtTheIntersect]

Oh god, the fail!

 

[IvantheLizard]

Jesus Imaginary Christ.

You know, the other countries, they don't want to further space research. No, they just want to get some alien tech, Thats why our next moon mission is an international effort that will put other countries' men on the moon as well. Because the U.S. is trying to hide this alien tech by giving it to everyone.

Oh, or the fact that luanching missiles at the moon for research purposes is totally mentioned as being bad in the International Space Treaty. It's right here in article... no, wait. Page!... no thats not it. Well it's in there somewhere.

And of course NASA photoshoped the pictures to edit out the atmosphere the moon clearly has as you can tell by looking at it. Well of course there is nothing there now. It's a clear day today on the moon.

That video = :facepalm:

 

[ImprobableJoe]

It isn't any crazier than the things Sarah Palin says... :lol:

 

[australopithecus]

My eyes! The goggles do nothing!

 

[frumple]

Hmmmm I wonder where the ETs where when the Starfish shot was done in the 1960s? :?

(FYI, Starfish was a nuclear test done to learn the effects of high altitude nuclear detonations in space. It pumped up the inner VanAllen belt so that there was high aurora activity for years. I believe it took close to a decade for the inner belt to get back done to normal levels).

 

[Netheralian]

Oh, or the fact that luanching missiles at the moon for research purposes is totally mentioned as being bad in the International Space Treaty. It's right here in article... no, wait. Page!... no thats not it. Well it's in there somewhere.

I think they meant to Moon Treaty - it would have taken them 2 seconds to google it if they were interested in actually doing some "research"... If they looked for two seconds longer they would have noticed that the US is not a signatory so it is somewhat irrelevant...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_Treaty

 

[Pulsar]

The term lunatics seems very appropriate...

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Holy crap the moon has atmosphere and clouds. Look I have ecidence:

:facepalm:

 

[boonw]

I used to think that creationists were the stupidest people on the face of the earth....


then I saw these guys

 

[Cool_Fire]

Here's the link to the NASA page to the project that's due to explode the bomb on the 9th of October:
http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/observation.htm

As for the claim that a could of water vapor was detected during the moon landings, the earliest record of this information I could find was a magazine article by Don Ecker called "Long Saga of Lunar Anomalies". Published in UFO magazine, Vol. 10, Nol 2 (March/April 1995), p. 23.
It stated the following "4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles."

What I have found, is that an earlier crash on the moon didn't reveal any signatures of water.
Source: http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast13oct99_1.htm and http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast03sep99_1.htm

If anyone can find where the claims of a cloud of water vapor being detected on the moon might have come from before the article in UFO magazine, please post them.

 

[Pulsar]

It stated the following "4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles."

If anyone can find where the claims of a cloud of water vapor being detected on the moon might have come from before the article in UFO magazine, please post them.

To my own surprise, this actually happened. I found this abstract on the nasa site, and here's the full article. It's also very briefly mentioned here. Apparently it was a one-time event, never repeated and never fully explained. I can't find any follow-up articles about it.

 

[Cool_Fire]

To my own surprise, this actually happened. I found this abstract on the nasa site, and here's the full article. It's also very briefly mentioned here. Apparently it was a one-time event, never repeated and never fully explained. I can't find any follow-up articles about it.

Very interesting, thanks for the follow-up.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

To my own surprise, this actually happened. I found this abstract on the nasa site, and here's the full article. It's also very briefly mentioned here. Apparently it was a one-time event, never repeated and never fully explained. I can't find any follow-up articles about it.

Then No. This sort of situation can happen all the time and wouldn't look like no where near the situation that was portraied by tinfoil-head (much less imply a tick atmosphere). Even because the picture that he presented has evidence is nothing else then an optical ilusion caused by the difrent gradients of the lunar surface. If you pay close attention you will notice that the shapes allign with the features of the ground and that they are features in the ground. oh and I bet you wouldn't see any clouds if he didin't told you to look for it. I may even go as far as to say that it is due debrees of the near by smaller impact craters.

 

[Cnidarious]

hilarious

 

[JacobEvans]

I have a really nice 4" telescope that I've used to look at the moon hundreds of times, I can testify that I've seen NO thick atmosphere on the lunar surface.

However, the presence of water in craters and at the poles wouldn't surprise me at all.

 

[MillionSword]

What? Is NASA actually gonna bomb the moon sometime this year?

 

[Finger]

They're staging an impact event. Accellerating then crashing a large weight into the Moon so they can look at the dust that gets kicked up. If the right sort of stuff is there, then it'll make a permanent Moon Station much more plausible.